[42] Agranat, R. and M. Gal (2025), Fueling Concentration: Network Effects and AI Agents, Elsevier BV, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5250253.
[19] AI Security Institute (2025), The Inspect Sandboxing Toolkit: Scalable and secure AI agent evaluations, https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/the-inspect-sandboxing-toolkit-scalable-and-secure-ai-agent-evaluations.
[51] Alansari, A. and H. Luqman (2026), “Large Language Models Hallucination: A Comprehensive Survey”, Computer Science Review, Vol. 61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2026.100970.
[81] Anthropic (2026), Claude is a space to think, https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-is-a-space-to-think.
[17] Anthropic (2024), Building effective agents, https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/building-effective-agents (accessed on September 2026).
[56] ARCEP (2026), Generative AI: Challenges for the Future of the Open Internet, https://www.arcep.fr/uploads/tx_gspublication/report-generative-AI-challenges-open-internet-january2026.pdf.
[58] Assad, S. et al. (2024), “Algorithmic Pricing and Competition: Empirical Evidence from the German Retail Gasoline Market”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 132/3, pp. 723-771, https://doi.org/10.1086/726906.
[38] Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (2025), A576 - Meta AI: the Italian Competition Authority orders Meta to suspend the terms excluding competing AI Chatbots from WhatsApp,, https://en.agcm.it/en/media/press-releases/2025/12/A576.
[30] Autorité de la concurrence (2026), AI agents: the Autorité de la concurrence issues its opinion on the competitive functioning of the AI agents sector, https://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/en/press-release/ai-agents-autorite-de-la-concurrence-issues-its-opinion-competitive-functioning-ai.
[14] Autorité de la concurrence (2026), Opinion No. 26-A-05 on the Competitive Functioning of the Artificial Intelligence Agents Sector, French Competition Authority, https://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/sites/default/files/commitments/2026-09/26a05_eng.pdf.
[50] Bansal, G. et al. (2025), “Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets”, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.25779 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
[72] Bansal, G. et al. (2021), “Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance”, Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445717.
[4] Bayiates, A. (2026), Business and IT leaders report AI agents are scaling faster than their guardrails, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/emerging-technologies/ai-agents-scaling-faster.html.
[46] Bichler, M. (2026), “Agentic markets”, Electronic Markets, Vol. 36/1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-026-00906-y.
[16] Bostoen, F. and J. Krämer (2026), “How Future-Proof is the DMA? A Case Study Of AI Agents”, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhag005.
[69] Busch, C. (2026), “Agentic AI and Consumer Protection”, CERRE Issue Paper, https://cerre.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CERRE_CERRE_Agentic-AI-and-Consumer-Protection.pdf.
[62] Calvano, E. et al. (2026), Algorithms and Competition in Agentic Markets, https://emiliocalvano.com/papers/algorithms-and-competition-in-agentic-markets.pdf.
[65] Cheng, X. and M. Aseri (2026), Breaking AI Collusion with Consumer AI, Elsevier BV, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6839464.
[15] CMA (2026), Agentic AI and Consumers, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/agentic-ai-and-consumers/agentic-ai-and-consumers.
[59] CMA (2026), AI and collusion: frontiers, opportunities and challenges, https://competitionandmarkets.blog.gov.uk/2026/03/04/ai-and-collusion-frontiers-opportunities-and-challenges/ (accessed on August 2026).
[74] CMA (2016), “CMA issues final decision in online cartel case”, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cma-issues-final-decision-in-online-cartel-case.
[41] Colangelo, G. (2026), Don’t catch me (too early) if you can: A competition policy perspective on the integration of assistive and agentic AI services, Elsevier BV, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6205158.
[33] Colangelo, G. and A. Ezrachi (2026), “AI Ecosystems, Power Shifts, and EU Competition Law Enforcement”, SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6841798.
[40] COMESA (2026), Notice Of Commencement Of Investigation Into Alleged Abuse Of Dominant Position By Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, https://comesacompetition.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/NOTICE_OF_COMMENCEMENT_OF_INVESTIGATION_WEBSITE.pdf.
[89] Congressional Research Service (2026), Artificial Intelligence Safety Collaboration and Antitrust Law, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11485.
[39] Conselho Administrativo de Defasa Econômica (2026), CADE upholds fine against Meta and WhatsApp, https://www.gov.br/cade/en/matters/news/cade-upholds-daily-fine-against-meta-and-whatsapp-for-failure-to-comply-with-interim-measure.
[73] Dietvorst, B., J. Simmons and C. Massey (2018), “Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them”, Management Science, Vol. 64/3, pp. 1155-1170, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643.
[90] Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum (2026), Protecting people and businesses in an agentic economy: A Joint Statement by DRCF Members, https://www.drcf.org.uk/publications/joint-statements/joint-statement-on-protecting-people-and-businesses-in-an-agentic-economy (accessed on November 2026).
[48] Dong, L., K. Luo and F. Xu (2026), From Product Search to Preference Articulation: The Economics of Agentic Commerce, Elsevier BV, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7208880.
[37] European Commission (2026), Commission imposes interim measures on Meta to preserve free access to WhatsApp for rival AI assistants,, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_1276.
[95] European Commission (2026), Commission provides guidance to Google for AI interoperability on Android and sharing of Google Search data under the Digital Markets Act, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_1634.
[36] European Commission (2026), Commission sends Meta fresh charge sheet on possible interim measures to reverse exclusion of third-party AI assistants from WhatsApp,, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_805.
[54] FCA (2026), Review into the long-term impact of AI on retail financial services (The Mills Review)., https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/calls-input/review-long-term-impact-ai-retail-financial-services-mills-review.
[61] Fish, S., Y. Gonczarowski and R. Shorrer (2025), “Algorithmic Collusion by Large Language Models”, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.00806.
[52] Fletcher, A. et al. (2023), “Biased Recommender Systems And Supplier Competition”, https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4319311.
[47] Gal, M. and N. Elkin-Koren (2017), “Algorithmic Consumers”, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 30, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2876201.
[80] Google (2026), New tech and tools for retailers to succeed in an agentic shopping era, https://blog.google/products/ads-commerce/agentic-commerce-ai-tools-protocol-retailers-platforms/.
[71] Google Cloud (2025), Announcing the Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol, https://developers.googleblog.com/en/a2a-a-new-era-of-agent-interoperability/ (accessed on 2026).
[83] Google Deepmind (2026), Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots, https://deepmind.google/blog/gemini-robotics-2-brings-whole-body-intelligence-to-robots/.
[45] Hadfield, G. and A. Koh (2025), An Economy of AI Agents, National Bureau of Economic Research / University of Chicago Press, https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/economics-transformative-ai/economy-ai-agents.
[6] Hammond, L. et al. (2025), Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI, https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~nisarg/papers/Multi-Agent-Risks-from-Advanced-AI.pdf.
[29] Hobbs, H. et al. (2026), “Exploring possible AI trajectories through 2030”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 55, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/cb41117a-en.
[84] Hugging Face (2025), SmolVLA: Efficient Vision-Language-Action Model trained on Lerobot Community Data, https://huggingface.co/blog/smolvla (accessed on September 2026).
[34] Hunt, S., E. Chissell and A. Mawar (2025), “Will 2025 be the year of the agent? A primer for competition practitioners on the next wave of AI innovation”, Competition Law & Policy Debate, Vol. 9/1, pp. 20-30, https://doi.org/10.4337/clpd.2025.0004.
[24] IMDA (2026), Model AI Governance Framework for agentic AI, https://www.imda.gov.sg/-/media/imda/files/about/emerging-tech-and-research/artificial-intelligence/mgf-for-agentic-ai.pdf.
[44] Immorlica, N. et al. (2024), “Generative AI as Economic Agents”, ACM SIGecom Exchanges, Vol. 22/1, pp. 93-109, https://doi.org/10.1145/3699824.3699832.
[63] Keppo, J. et al. (2026), On the Fragility of AI Agent Collusion, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5386338.
[60] Köbis, N. et al. (2025), “Delegation to artificial intelligence can increase dishonest behaviour”, Nature, Vol. 646/8083, pp. 126-134, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09505-x.
[94] Linux foundation (2025), Linux Foundation Announces the Formation of the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), Anchored by New Project Contributions Including Model Context Protocol (MCP), goose and AGENTS.md, https://www.linuxfoundation.org/press/linux-foundation-announces-the-formation-of-the-agentic-ai-foundation.
[20] Liu, J. (2026), “Engineering and Governing the agent harness”, UNU Macau Technology Report, No. 1, United Nations University Institute in Macau, Macau., https://unu.edu/sites/default/files/2026-07/Engineering_and_Governing_the_Agent_Harness.pdf.
[21] Marchand, R. et al. (2026), Quantifying Frontier LLM Capabilities for Container Sandbox Escape, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.02277.
[55] Marro, S. and P. Torr (2025), “LLM Agents Are the Antidote to Walled Gardens”, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.23978 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
[77] Mastercard (2026), Worldline, ING and Mastercard complete a live end-to-end European agentic payment in production, https://www.mastercard.com/news/europe/en/newsroom/press-releases/en/2026/worldline-ing-and-mastercard-complete-a-live-end-to-end-european-agentic-payment-in-production (accessed on September 2026).
[70] May, R. (2026), “Generative AI Use by Competition Authorities: Why, Why Not, and What Might Be”, Stanford Computational Antitrust, Vol. 6, pp. 112-138, https://law.stanford.edu/publications/generative-ai-use-by-competition-authorities-why-why-not-and-what-might-be/.
[22] Microsoft (2026), Observability for Generative AI and agentic AI systems, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/zero-trust/sfi/observability-ai-systems (accessed on September 2026).
[66] Motwani, S. et al. (2024), “Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganography”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37, pp. 73439-73486, https://doi.org/10.52202/079017-2336.
[64] Mukherjee, A. and H. Chang (2025), From Conspiracy to Convergence: A ’Duty to Disrupt’ in Two-Sided Agentic Markets, Elsevier BV, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5382575.
[91] Nisan, N. and E. Zerah (2026), “Domination-Avoiding Learning Agents Cannot Collude”, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.01275.
[85] Nvidia (2026), NVIDIA Isaac ROS 5.0 Advances Agentic, Open Source Robotics Development, https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/isaac-ros-5-0-agentic-open-source-robotics/ (accessed on September 2026).
[86] Nvidia (2026), NVIDIA to Acquire Hugging Face, https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-to-acquire-hugging-face/ (accessed on September 2026).
[13] OECD (2026), “Agentic AI in organisations: Early insights from practitioner interviews”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 65, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1257a26f-en.
[28] OECD (2026), Artificial Intelligence markets: Recent developments and competition issues, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d531d73f-en.
[25] OECD (2026), Benefits of AI Openness, https://doi.org/10.1787/746e8c9a-en.
[12] OECD (2026), “Competition and consumer policy in digital markets”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 332, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/042c0c49-en.
[57] OECD (2026), “Information sharing in competition policy”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 335, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ecbf13e9-en.
[1] OECD (2026), “The agentic AI landscape and its conceptual foundations”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 56, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/396cf758-en.
[27] OECD (2025), “AI openness: A primer for policymakers”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 44, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/02f73362-en.
[9] OECD (2025), Algorithmic pricing and competition in G7 jurisdictions: Emerging trends and responses, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f36dacf8-en.
[2] OECD (2025), “Artificial intelligence and competitive dynamics in downstream markets”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 331, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ccf0624a-en.
[11] OECD (2025), “Competition in artificial intelligence infrastructure”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 330, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/623d1874-en.
[75] OECD (2025), “Competition in the provision of cloud computing services”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 323, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/595859c5-en.
[10] OECD (2024), “Artificial intelligence, data and competition”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 18, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e7e88884-en.
[68] OECD (2024), Competition Policy in Digital Markets: The Combined Effect of Ex Ante and Ex Post Instruments in G7 Jurisdictions, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/80552a33-en.
[8] OECD (2023), “Algorithmic Competition”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 296, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/cb3b2075-en.
[49] OECD (2022), “Integrating Consumer Behaviour Insights in Competition Enforcement ”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 282, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/61d487df-en.
[31] OECD (2022), OECD Handbook on Competition Policy in the Digital Age, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c8c1841b-en.
[26] OECD (2021), “Competition Economics of Digital Ecosystems”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 255, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5145fce1-en.
[32] OECD (2018), “Market Concentration”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 213, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/7231c298-en.
[7] OECD (2017), “Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age”, OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers, No. 206, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/258dcb14-en.
[96] OFGEM (2019), “Infringement by Economy Energy, E (Gas and Electricity) and Dyball”, https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/press-release/ofgem-finds-e-gas-and-electricity-economy-energy-and-dyball-associates-breach-competition-law.
[67] Ohlhausen, M. (2017), Should We Fear The Things That Go Beep In the Night? Some Initial Thoughts on the Intersection of Antitrust Law and Algorithmic Pricing, https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/1220893/ohlhausen_-_concurrences_5-23-17.pdf.
[78] OpenAI (2026), Powering Product Discovery in ChatGPT, https://openai.com/index/powering-product-discovery-in-chatgpt/.
[79] OpenAI (2026), Testing ads in ChatGPT, originally published 9 February, updated 11 August, https://openai.com/index/testing-ads-in-chatgpt/.
[76] OpenAI (2025), Buy it in ChatGPT: Instant Checkout and the Agentic Commerce Protocol, https://openai.com/index/buy-it-in-chatgpt/ (accessed on September 2026).
[5] PWC (2025), PwC’s AI Agent Survey, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/tech-effect/ai-analytics/ai-agent-survey.html.
[93] PYMNTS (2026), Merchants Put AI to Work Without Handing Over the Customer, https://www.pymnts.com/news/artificial-intelligence/2026/merchants-put-ai-work-without-handing-over-customer/.
[23] Rao, A. et al. (2026), Challenges to the monitoring of deployed AI systems:, National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.), Gaithersburg, MD, https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.ai.800-4.
[92] Schrepel, T. and A. Ribera Martinez (2026), Computational Antitrust Worldwide: Fifth Cross-Agency Report, https://law.stanford.edu/publications/computational-antitrust-worldwide-fifth-cross-agency-report/.
[3] Stackoverflow (2026), Agents on a leash: Agentic AI remains mostly single-agent and monitored at work, https://stackoverflow.blog/2026/05/27/agents-on-a-leash-agentic-ai-remains-mostly-monitored-at-work/.
[43] Stucke, M. and A. Ezrachi (2017), “How Your Digital Helper May Undermine Your Welfare, and Our Democracy”, SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2957960.
[35] Thomas, S. (2026), “Inter-AI-Agent Competition”, CPI Antitrust Chronicle, https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/3-INTER-AI-AGENT-COMPETITION-Stefan-Thomas.pdf.
[82] US DOJ (2025), Justice Department Requires RealPage to End the Sharing of Competitively Sensitive Information and Alignment of Pricing Among Competitors, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-requires-realpage-end-sharing-competitively-sensitive-information-and.
[18] Wang, L. et al. (2024), “A survey on large language model based autonomous agents”, Frontiers of Computer Science, Vol. 18/6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1.
[87] Washington Post (2026), China says it ordered reversal of Meta’s Manus AI acquisition, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/04/27/china-ai-meta-manus/.
[53] Zac, A. and M. Gal (2025), The Price of Advice: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of AI Recommenders, Elsevier BV, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5637090.
[88] Zhao, H. et al. (2024), “Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey”, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. 15/2, pp. 1-38, https://doi.org/10.1145/3639372.