The centralised wage agreements have helped to contain inflation. There is evidence that wage
increases were more moderate when a central agreement was concluded than in periods when no central agreement was reached. Nevertheless, there is also evidence that centralised wage setting has had some drawbacks in terms of reducing employment among low-skilled and younger workers because of high minimum wage floors. In the current wage setting system there are components that allow for greater relative wage flexibility. These should be used more extensively. The role of the government in future agreements should be to encourage greater relative wage flexibility within the current bargaining framework.
This paper relates to the 2006 Economic Survey of Finland (www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/finland).
Wage Setting in Finland
Increasing Flexibility in Centralised Wage Agreements
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper19 June 202652 Pages
-
15 June 2026110 Pages
-
12 June 202658 Pages
-
Working paper
New evidence from the OECD Product Market Regulation Indicators
1 June 202657 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from a new dataset of monthly card spending for 12 countries and 9 spending categories
18 May 202661 Pages -
1 April 202662 Pages
-
1 April 202627 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
Implications for forward‑looking policy design
24 April 202665 Pages -
15 April 2026