Combining existing information with a newly collected dataset, the paper develops indicators of the
performance and the institutional characteristics of OECD judicial systems. It provides cross-country
comparisons of measures of trial length, accessibility to justice services and predictability of decisions. It
then investigates how trial length is related to some of the underlying characteristics of the systems. There
is a large cross-country variation in trial length and in appeal rates (a proxy of the predictability of
decisions), which are only partially explained by restrictions to appeal. Cross-country differences in trial
length are related to the shares of the justice budget devoted to computerisation, the systematic production
of statistics on case-flow, the active management of the progress of cases by courts, the presence of
specialised commercial courts and systems of court governance assigning greater managerial
responsibilities to the chief judge. Indicators of good public governance are associated with lower
litigation, which in turn has a significant impact on trial length. Free negotiation of lawyers’ fees, as
opposed to regulated fees, appears to be associated with lower litigation.
The Economics of Civil Justice
New Cross-country Data and Empirics
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper19 June 202652 Pages
-
15 June 2026110 Pages
-
12 June 202658 Pages
-
Working paper
New evidence from the OECD Product Market Regulation Indicators
1 June 202657 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from a new dataset of monthly card spending for 12 countries and 9 spending categories
18 May 202661 Pages -
1 April 202662 Pages
-
1 April 202627 Pages
Related publications
-
Policy brief10 June 20268 Pages
-
23 December 202564 Pages
-
17 December 202539 Pages