This report combines multiple novel datasets to provide evidence that government support has contributed to increased carbon emissions from aluminium and steelmaking activities through an increase in production output and by shifting production to more emission intensive plants. While improvements in technology have driven overall emissions downward, there is no evidence that government support in this sector has been targeted at, or has contributed to, developing techniques that improve environmental performance. Removing such support could therefore contribute to a cost-effective decarbonisation strategy. For example, removing government support to aluminium smelting and steel making worldwide would reduce carbon emissions by 75% more than the reduction observed in 2020 resulting from COVID-related restrictions. In addition, the removal of such support would free up scarce public resources for alternative uses.
The climate implications of government support in aluminium smelting and steelmaking
An Empirical Analysis
Policy paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
Insights from case studies of cobalt, lithium and nickel
18 December 202578 Pages -
Working paper3 December 202549 Pages
-
Working paper
The TiVA‑MoS database
12 September 202530 Pages -
Policy paper
Going paperless today, going paperless tomorrow
9 September 202554 Pages -
Working paper26 June 202545 Pages
-
Working paper25 June 202550 Pages
-
Working paper
The role of trade agreements and sustainability initiatives
9 May 202571 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
Cross‑country evidence for the manufacturing sector
19 December 202547 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from case studies of cobalt, lithium and nickel
18 December 202578 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from a decomposition analysis for the OECD and the world
11 December 202530 Pages -
Working paper30 June 202566 Pages