Recent analyses linked the decline of the US labour share over past decades to reallocation favouring highly productive “superstar” firms with low labour shares, and “shooting stars”, firms experiencing transient labour share drops and productivity surges. This work provides novel cross-country evidence on the productivity-labour share nexus over recent decades. Productivity and labour shares are inversely related, both at the firm and industry levels. Reallocation to firms with persistently low labour shares significantly reduces aggregate labour shares across countries, whereas shooting stars play only a limited role. Persistent low labour share firms are a specific type of productivity superstar characterised by low wages and high capital intensity. Their rise is related to productivity divergence within industries and rising export volumes. These findings raise concerns about the extent to which the workforce benefits from aggregate productivity growth, and suggests the importance of policies that can strengthen the productivity-wage link.
Superstars, shooting stars, and the labour share
Cross-country evidence
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
29 April 202643 Pages
-
14 April 202674 Pages
-
3 April 202657 Pages
-
4 March 202682 Pages
-
19 February 202682 Pages
-
30 January 202672 Pages
-
22 January 202688 Pages
-
Working paper
Insights from new data sources and AI‑assisted methods
26 November 202562 Pages
Related publications
-
3 April 202657 Pages
-
10 March 202646 Pages
-
28 January 202640 Pages
-
23 December 202564 Pages
-
19 December 202551 Pages
-
17 December 202539 Pages