Finland has long demonstrated a commitment to transparency, public trust, and integrity in governance. The Ministry of Finance plays a central co-ordinating role, and government-level efforts have established an internal control and risk management framework, along with corresponding guidance, across central government agencies. These form a strong basis for reform. However, the diagnostic assessment, conducted through stakeholder interviews, surveys, desk analysis, and review of OECD Public Integrity Indicators, reveals implementation gaps that limit the overall effectiveness of internal control systems.
Key findings include:
A fragmented internal control framework and a lack of clarity on roles, responsibilities, and objectives across ministries.
Inconsistent managerial accountability and awareness of internal control, undermining effective implementation.
Lack of a comprehensive central harmonisation function, limiting co-ordinated government-wide improvements and oversight.
Weaknesses in internal audit capacity, including inconsistent internal audit independence and the absence of quality assurance practices or professional development schemes.
Absence of comprehensive reporting and monitoring mechanisms, resulting in limited visibility of risks and performance across the system.
Despite meeting 60% of the regulatory benchmarks, Finland fulfils only 5% of the practical implementation criteria for internal control and audit, based on OECD Public Integrity Indicators (OECD averages are 67% and 33% respectively). This points to a significant gap between design and execution (based on data extracted from the OECD Public Integrity Indicators Database in 2023 and analysed in 2024).