Public support to families with pre-school children can be in the form of cash benefits (e.g. child allowances) or of “in-kind” support (e.g. care services such as kindergartens). The mix of these support measures varies greatly across OECD countries, from a cash / in-kind composition of 10%/90% to 80%/20%. This paper imputes the value of services into an “extended” household income and compares the resulting distributive patterns and the redistributive effect of these two strands of family policies. On average, cash and in-kind transfers each constitute 7 – 8% of the incomes of families with young children. Both instruments are redistributive. Cash transfers reduce child poverty by one third, with the estimated impacts in Austria, Ireland, Sweden, Hungary and Finland performing above average. When services are accounted for, child poverty falls by one quarter and poverty among children enrolled in childcare is more than halved. This reduction is highest in Belgium, France, Hungary, Iceland and Sweden.
Money or Kindergarten? Distributive Effects of Cash Versus In‑Kind Family Transfers for Young Children
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
10 February 202653 Pages
-
Working paper3 December 202568 Pages
-
Working paper
How to get robust comparisons across countries and over time
3 December 202557 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from labour market data
30 June 202571 Pages -
Working paper
Insights and examples from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study in New Zealand
30 June 202554 Pages -
Working paper
Cross‑country evidence on income mobility from tax record data
27 June 202545 Pages -
27 June 202550 Pages
-
Working paper25 June 202590 Pages
Related publications
-
Report
Rationale, empirical approaches and future directions
20 March 2026145 Pages -
Report
Governance, monitoring and data development
23 September 2025213 Pages -
17 September 202511 Pages