The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.
Is the Last Mile the Longest? Economic Gains from Gender Equality in Nordic Countries
Annex A. Additional tables and figures
Copy link to Annex A. Additional tables and figuresFigure A A.1. Men's employment has been declining slowly for decades
Copy link to Figure A A.1. Men's employment has been declining slowly for decadesMale employment rate, 15-64 year-olds, 1960-2016, selected OECD countries
Note: Dashed lines reflect estimated data points (see Annex B).
Source: OECD Employment Database (http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm), and OECD estimates based on data from the OECD Annual Labour Force Statistics Database (http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=451), Eurostat (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database), and national statistical offices (see Annex B).
Figure A A.2. Men's average working hours have decreased, especially in Denmark and Iceland
Copy link to Figure A A.2. Men's average working hours have decreased, especially in Denmark and IcelandMale average usual weekly working hours, all ages, 1975-2016, selected OECD countries
Note: Data refer to average usual weekly working hours in the main job, and cover all employed (both employees and self-employed) of all ages. Data for the United States refer to dependent employees, only. Dashed lines reflect estimated data points (see Annex B for details).
Source: OECD Employment Database (http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm), and OECD estimates based on data from the OECD Annual Labour Force Statistics Database (http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=451), Eurostat (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database), and national statistical offices (see Annex B).
Figure A A.3. All of the Nordic countries have seen large increases in GDP per capita over the past 50 years or so
Copy link to Figure A A.3. All of the Nordic countries have seen large increases in GDP per capita over the past 50 years or soGDP per capita, constant prices, constant PPPs, OECD base year (USD 2010), 1960-2016
Source: OECD National Accounts Database (www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm), and Statistics Norway (https://www.ssb.no/en/) for Norway.
Table A A.1. In the Nordic countries, gender employment gaps tend to fall around the time of economic crises but widen again during the recovery
Copy link to Table A A.1. In the Nordic countries, gender employment gaps tend to fall around the time of economic crises but widen again during the recoveryEmployment rates in the Nordic countries around the time of the early-1990s economic crisis (Finland and Sweden) and the Great Recession (Denmark, Iceland and Norway), 15-64 year-olds, by gender
|
|
|
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Finland |
Male |
78.4 |
77.9 |
73.0 |
67.3 |
63.1 |
62.6 |
64.8 |
66.0 |
66.6 |
68.2 |
|
|
Female |
71.4 |
71.5 |
68.4 |
63.8 |
59.7 |
58.7 |
59.0 |
59.5 |
60.4 |
61.3 |
|
|
Gender gap |
7.1 |
6.4 |
4.6 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.8 |
5.8 |
6.5 |
6.2 |
6.8 |
|
Sweden |
Male |
85.1 |
85.2 |
82.7 |
78.2 |
73.1 |
72.2 |
73.5 |
73.2 |
72.4 |
73.6 |
|
|
Female |
80.7 |
81.0 |
79.3 |
76.2 |
72.1 |
70.7 |
70.9 |
69.9 |
68.9 |
69.4 |
|
|
Gender gap |
4.4 |
4.3 |
3.4 |
1.9 |
1.0 |
1.6 |
2.6 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
|
Denmark |
Male |
80.8 |
81.6 |
78.0 |
75.6 |
75.9 |
75.2 |
75.0 |
75.8 |
76.6 |
77.7 |
|
Female |
73.2 |
74.1 |
72.7 |
71.1 |
70.4 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
69.8 |
70.4 |
72.0 |
|
|
Gender gap |
7.6 |
7.5 |
5.3 |
4.5 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
6.0 |
6.2 |
5.7 |
|
|
Iceland |
Male |
89.5 |
87.8 |
80.6 |
80.6 |
80.8 |
81.9 |
83.7 |
84.4 |
86.6 |
89.0 |
|
Female |
81.7 |
80.3 |
77.2 |
77.0 |
77.3 |
78.5 |
79.9 |
80.0 |
81.8 |
83.4 |
|
|
Gender gap |
7.8 |
7.5 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
4.4 |
4.8 |
5.6 |
|
|
Norway |
Male |
79.7 |
80.6 |
78.4 |
77.4 |
77.2 |
77.7 |
77.4 |
77.1 |
76.6 |
75.8 |
|
Female |
74.0 |
75.4 |
74.4 |
73.3 |
73.4 |
73.8 |
73.5 |
73.4 |
73.0 |
72.8 |
|
|
Gender gap |
5.6 |
5.2 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.0 |
Source: OECD Employment Database (www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm).
Table A A.2. Except for in Iceland, gender working hours gaps in the Nordic countries have changed little around the times of recession
Copy link to Table A A.2. Except for in Iceland, gender working hours gaps in the Nordic countries have changed little around the times of recessionAverage usual weekly working hours in the Nordic countries around the time of the early-1990s economic crisis (Finland and Sweden) and the Great Recession (Denmark, Iceland and Norway), all ages, total employment, by gender
|
|
|
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Finland |
Male |
.. |
42.2* |
41.2* |
42.0* |
41.8* |
42.5* |
42.4* |
42.8* |
42.5* |
42.0* |
|
|
Female |
.. |
36.8* |
36.9* |
37.1* |
36.2* |
37.2* |
36.9* |
37.3* |
37.1* |
36.8* |
|
|
Gender gap |
.. |
5.3* |
4.3* |
4.9* |
5.6* |
5.3* |
5.6* |
5.5* |
5.4* |
5.2* |
|
Sweden |
Male |
38.6* |
38.7* |
38.8* |
38.9* |
38.9* |
39.0* |
38.9* |
38.9* |
38.9* |
38.9* |
|
|
Female |
35.5* |
35.2* |
35.3* |
35.4* |
35.5* |
35.4* |
35.2* |
35.1* |
34.9* |
34.7* |
|
|
Gender gap |
3.1* |
3.5* |
3.5* |
3.5* |
3.4* |
3.6* |
3.7* |
3.8* |
4.0* |
4.2* |
|
|
|
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
|
Denmark |
Male |
36.6 |
36.2 |
35.8 |
35.9 |
35.9 |
35.7 |
35.7 |
35.6 |
35.6 |
34.9 |
|
|
Female |
31.8 |
31.7 |
31.4 |
31.2 |
31.2 |
31.2 |
31.3 |
31.1 |
31.0 |
30.6 |
|
|
Gender gap |
4.8 |
4.5 |
4.4 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
4.5 |
4.6 |
4.2 |
|
Iceland |
Male |
47.0 |
46.0 |
43.8 |
43.4 |
44.1 |
43.6 |
43.9 |
43.8 |
43.9 |
43.3 |
|
|
Female |
35.2 |
35.5 |
34.5 |
34.4 |
34.9 |
35.0 |
34.9 |
35.2 |
35.0 |
34.9 |
|
|
Gender gap |
11.8 |
10.5 |
9.3 |
9.1 |
9.2 |
8.6 |
9.0 |
8.6 |
8.9 |
8.4 |
|
Norway |
Male |
37.3 |
37.1 |
37.0 |
36.8 |
36.9 |
36.8 |
36.8 |
37.0 |
36.5 |
36.6 |
|
|
Female |
30.8 |
31.1 |
31.1 |
31.1 |
31.1 |
31.5 |
31.4 |
31.6 |
31.6 |
31.8 |
|
|
Gender gap |
6.5 |
6.1 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
5.4 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
Note: Data refer to average usual weekly working hours in the main job, and cover all employed (both employees and self-employed) of all ages. Data points marked with an * refer to estimated data (see Annex B).
Source: OECD Employment Database (http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm), and OECD estimates based on data from national statistical offices (see Annex B).
Table A A.3. Increases in women’s employment have contributed to economic growth in the Nordic countries
Copy link to Table A A.3. Increases in women’s employment have contributed to economic growth in the Nordic countriesAverage annual rate of growth in GDP per capita and disaggregation of growth into its primary components, longest available series, Nordic and selected other OECD member countries
|
GDP per capita, average annual growth rate (%) |
Percentage point contribution of main components |
Decomposition of contribution of the employment rate, by gender |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Labour productivity (p.p.) |
Working age share of population (p.p.) |
Employment rate (p.p.) |
Men's employment (p.p.) |
Women's employment (p.p.) |
||
|
Denmark (1967-2016) |
1.64 |
1.55 |
0.00 |
0.09 |
-0.15 |
0.24 |
|
Finland (1970-2016) |
2.01 |
2.19 |
-0.12 |
-0.06 |
-0.12 |
0.05 |
|
Iceland (1970-2016) |
2.42 |
1.83 |
0.20 |
0.40 |
0.00 |
0.40 |
|
Norway (mainland) (1972-2016) |
1.99 |
1.46 |
0.16 |
0.36 |
-0.05 |
0.41 |
|
Sweden (1963-2016) |
1.92 |
1.93 |
-0.07 |
0.06 |
-0.19 |
0.25 |
|
Canada (1971-2016) |
1.58 |
1.01 |
0.15 |
0.41 |
-0.06 |
0.48 |
|
France (1962-2016) |
2.06 |
2.09 |
-0.05 |
0.01 |
-0.25 |
0.26 |
|
Germany (1991-2016) |
1.24 |
0.88 |
-0.22 |
0.58 |
0.11 |
0.47 |
|
Italy (1970-2016) |
1.46 |
1.24 |
-0.04 |
0.26 |
-0.17 |
0.43 |
|
Japan (1970-2015) |
2.10 |
2.13 |
-0.31 |
0.28 |
0.07 |
0.21 |
|
United Kingdom (1960-2016) |
1.97 |
1.84 |
-0.01 |
0.14 |
-0.19 |
0.32 |
|
United States (1970-2016) |
1.77 |
1.41 |
0.22 |
0.14 |
-0.12 |
0.26 |
Note: Estimates based on the decomposition of national accounts data using labour force survey estimates. Differences in the time periods covered mean estimates are not fully comparable across countries. See Annex B for more detail.
Source: OECD estimates based on data from the OECD National Accounts Database (http://www.oecd.org/std/na/), the OECD Employment Database (http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm), the European Commission's AMECO Database (http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/user/serie/SelectSerie.cfm), Eurostat (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database), and national statistical offices (see Annex B).
Table A A.4. Most of the gains from women’s employment have come from 25-54 year-old women, but 55-64 year-old women have contributed too
Copy link to Table A A.4. Most of the gains from women’s employment have come from 25-54 year-old women, but 55-64 year-old women have contributed tooAverage annual rate of growth in GDP per capita and disaggregation of growth into its primary components, with the contribution of women's employment disaggregated by age group, longest available series, Nordic and selected other OECD member countries
|
GDP per capita, average annual growth rate (%) |
Percentage point contribution of main components |
Decomposition of the contribution of the employment rate, by gender |
Disaggregation of the contribution of women's employment by age group |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Labour productivity (p.p.) |
Working age share of population (p.p.) |
Employment rate (p.p.) |
Men's employment (p.p.) |
Women's employment (p.p.) |
15-24 year olds (p.p.) |
25-54 year-olds (p.p.) |
55-64 year-olds (p.p.) |
||
|
Denmark (1983-2016) |
1.39 |
1.29 |
-0.07 |
0.16 |
0.03 |
0.14 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
|
Finland (1970-2016) |
2.01 |
2.19 |
-0.12 |
-0.06 |
-0.12 |
0.05 |
-0.13 |
0.08 |
0.10 |
|
Iceland (1991-2016) |
1.82 |
1.56 |
-0.05 |
0.31 |
0.10 |
0.20 |
0.01 |
0.08 |
0.11 |
|
Norway (mainland) (1972-2016) |
1.99 |
1.46 |
0.16 |
0.36 |
-0.05 |
0.41 |
0.00 |
0.34 |
0.08 |
|
Sweden (1963-2016) |
1.92 |
1.93 |
-0.07 |
0.06 |
-0.19 |
0.25 |
-0.06 |
0.23 |
0.08 |
|
Canada (1976-2016) |
1.37 |
0.89 |
0.04 |
0.44 |
-0.02 |
0.46 |
-0.09 |
0.40 |
0.15 |
|
France (1968-2016) |
1.78 |
1.74 |
0.00 |
0.04 |
-0.25 |
0.29 |
-0.12 |
0.36 |
0.05 |
|
Germany (1991-2016) |
1.24 |
0.88 |
-0.22 |
0.58 |
0.11 |
0.47 |
-0.07 |
0.27 |
0.28 |
|
Italy (1970-2016) |
1.46 |
1.24 |
-0.04 |
0.26 |
-0.17 |
0.43 |
-0.11 |
0.39 |
0.15 |
|
Japan (1970-2015) |
2.10 |
2.13 |
-0.31 |
0.28 |
0.07 |
0.21 |
-0.13 |
0.22 |
0.12 |
|
United Kingdom (1984-2016) |
1.82 |
1.44 |
-0.05 |
0.42 |
0.06 |
0.37 |
-0.07 |
0.33 |
0.11 |
|
United States (1970-2016) |
1.77 |
1.41 |
0.22 |
0.14 |
-0.12 |
0.26 |
-0.06 |
0.24 |
0.08 |
Note: Estimates based on the decomposition of national accounts data using labour force survey estimates. Differences in the time periods covered mean estimates are not fully comparable across countries. See Annex B for more detail.
Source: OECD estimates based on data from the OECD National Accounts Database (http://www.oecd.org/std/na/), the OECD Employment Database (http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm), the European Commission's AMECO Database (http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/user/serie/SelectSerie.cfm), Eurostat (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database), and national statistical offices (see Annex B).
Table A A.5. Growth in women’s working hours have contributed relatively little to economic growth in the Nordic countries
Copy link to Table A A.5. Growth in women’s working hours have contributed relatively little to economic growth in the Nordic countriesAverage annual rate of growth in GDP per capita and disaggregation of growth into its primary components, employment rates and working hours, longest available series, Nordic and selected other OECD member countries
|
GDP per capita, average annual growth rate (%) |
Percentage point contribution of main components |
Decomposition of the contribution of the employment rate, by gender |
Decomposition of the contribution of working hours, by gender |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Labour productivity (p.p.) |
Working age share of population (p.p.) |
Employment rate (p.p.) |
Working hours (p.p.) |
Men's employment (p.p.) |
Women's employment (p.p.) |
Men's working hours (p.p.) |
Women's working hours (p.p.) |
||
|
Denmark (1983-2016) |
1.39 |
1.58 |
-0.07 |
0.17 |
-0.29 |
0.03 |
0.14 |
-0.33 |
0.04 |
|
Finland (1990-2016) |
1.21 |
1.85 |
-0.26 |
-0.07 |
-0.31 |
-0.06 |
-0.01 |
-0.22 |
-0.09 |
|
Iceland (1991-2016) |
1.82 |
1.82 |
-0.05 |
0.31 |
-0.26 |
0.11 |
0.20 |
-0.41 |
0.15 |
|
Norway (mainland) (1975-2016) |
1.86 |
1.85 |
0.13 |
0.38 |
-0.50 |
-0.03 |
0.41 |
-0.66 |
0.16 |
|
Sweden (1987-2016) |
1.56 |
1.66 |
-0.03 |
-0.21 |
0.15 |
-0.12 |
-0.10 |
0.11 |
0.04 |
|
Canada (1976-2016) |
1.37 |
2.08 |
0.04 |
0.47 |
-1.22 |
-0.02 |
0.49 |
-1.08 |
-0.14 |
|
France (1983-2016) |
1.25 |
1.52 |
-0.19 |
0.25 |
-0.33 |
-0.11 |
0.36 |
-0.44 |
0.10 |
|
Germany (1991-2016) |
1.24 |
1.43 |
-0.23 |
0.58 |
-0.55 |
0.11 |
0.47 |
-0.47 |
-0.08 |
|
Italy (1983-2016) |
0.97 |
1.00 |
-0.19 |
0.41 |
-0.25 |
-0.05 |
0.46 |
-0.44 |
0.19 |
|
United Kingdom (1984-2016) |
1.82 |
1.70 |
-0.05 |
0.43 |
-0.26 |
0.06 |
0.37 |
-0.44 |
0.19 |
|
United States (1979-2016) |
1.60 |
2.39 |
0.04 |
0.10 |
-0.93 |
-0.09 |
0.20 |
-0.73 |
-0.20 |
Note: Estimates based on the decomposition of national accounts data using labour force survey estimates. Differences in the time periods covered mean estimates are not fully comparable across countries. See Annex B for more detail.
Source: OECD estimates based on data from the OECD National Accounts Database (http://www.oecd.org/std/na/), the OECD Employment Database (http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm), the European Commission's AMECO Database (http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/user/serie/SelectSerie.cfm), Eurostat (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database), and national statistical offices (see Annex B).
Table A A.6. The relatively high levels of female employment in the Nordic countries contribute to their relative prosperity
Copy link to Table A A.6. The relatively high levels of female employment in the Nordic countries contribute to their relative prosperityGap in GDP per capita relative to the OECD-30 total and decomposition of the gap into its primary components, USD 2010 PPP, 2015, Nordic and selected other OECD member countries
|
Difference in GDP per capita (USD) |
Percentage point contribution of main components |
Decomposition of the contribution of the employment rate, by gender |
Decomposition of the contribution of working hours, by gender |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Labour productivity (USD) |
Working age share of population (USD) |
Employment rate (USD) |
Average working hours (USD) |
Men's employment (USD) |
Women's employment (USD) |
Men's working hours (USD) |
Women's working hours (USD) |
||
|
Denmark |
2 429.0 |
7 736.1 |
- 136.8 |
2 994.7 |
-8 165.0 |
1 115.2 |
1 879.5 |
-5 301.9 |
-2 863.1 |
|
Finland |
-4 226.9 |
-1 839.6 |
- 564.4 |
- 244.7 |
-1 578.1 |
-1 066.1 |
821.3 |
-2 337.5 |
759.3 |
|
Iceland |
135.0 |
-11 519.5 |
-1 281.4 |
8 727.4 |
4 208.5 |
3 817.7 |
4 909.6 |
2 370.8 |
1 837.7 |
|
Norway (mainland) |
8 014.5 |
11 780.7 |
1 002.8 |
3 910.5 |
-8 679.6 |
1 539.2 |
2 371.3 |
-5 619.9 |
-3 059.7 |
|
Sweden |
2 228.0 |
2 460.7 |
- 955.5 |
3 154.3 |
-2 431.5 |
912.6 |
2 241.7 |
-2 729.3 |
297.7 |
|
Canada |
322.6 |
-3 556.9 |
1 293.6 |
2 489.1 |
96.7 |
669.4 |
1 819.7 |
- 528.9 |
625.6 |
|
France |
-5 176.3 |
4 489.2 |
-2 959.4 |
-1 933.7 |
-4 772.3 |
-1 828.1 |
- 105.7 |
-3 516.3 |
-1 256.0 |
|
Germany |
575.8 |
4 678.4 |
337.2 |
4 904.0 |
-9 343.7 |
2 383.3 |
2 520.7 |
-4 654.3 |
-4 689.4 |
|
Italy |
-8 844.5 |
-3 740.2 |
- 30.3 |
-5 399.9 |
325.8 |
-1 428.7 |
-3 971.2 |
2 124.6 |
-1 798.7 |
|
United Kingdom |
-3 733.2 |
-3 845.9 |
-1 140.1 |
2 347.0 |
-1 094.2 |
927.4 |
1 419.6 |
- 1.9 |
-1 092.2 |
|
United States |
9 816.6 |
8 190.7 |
- 527.7 |
917.8 |
1 235.8 |
202.6 |
715.2 |
- 172.4 |
1 408.2 |
Note: Estimates based on the decomposition of national accounts data using labour force survey estimates. Differences in definitions and the data used mean estimates are not fully comparable across countries. See Annex B for more details
Source: OECD estimates based on data from the OECD National Accounts Database (http://www.oecd.org/std/na/), the OECD Employment Database (http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm), the European Commission's AMECO Database (http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/user/serie/SelectSerie.cfm), Eurostat (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database), and national statistical offices (see Annex B)
Table A A.7. Potential gains from closing gender participation gaps are fairly small in the Nordic countries, but closing working hours gaps could lead to larger gains
Copy link to Table A A.7. Potential gains from closing gender participation gaps are fairly small in the Nordic countries, but closing working hours gaps could lead to larger gainsProjected GDP per capita and projected average annual rate of growth in GDP per capita under different gender gap scenarios, 2013-2040, OECD countries
|
GDP per capita, 2012, USD 2005 PPP |
Projected GDP per capita, 2040, USD 2005 PPP |
Average annual rate of growth in GDP per capita, 2013-2040, % |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Labour force participation scenario: |
Baseline |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 |
50% by 2025, 100% by 2040 |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 |
50% by 2025, 100% by 2040 |
Baseline |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 |
50% by 2025, 100% by 2040 |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 |
50% by 2025, 100% by 2040 |
|
|
Working hours scenario: |
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 (male driven) |
50% by 2025, 100% by 2040 |
Baseline |
Baseline |
Baseline |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 |
25% by 2025, 50% by 2040 (male driven) |
50% by 2025, 100% by 2040 |
|
|
Denmark |
32 393.1 |
50 739.6 |
51 755.9 |
52 524.1 |
52 753.3 |
50 642.1 |
56 881.3 |
1.62 |
1.69 |
1.74 |
1.76 |
1.61 |
2.03 |
|
Finland |
31 634.7 |
50 983.3 |
51 214.4 |
51 704.2 |
52 076.2 |
49 918.5 |
54 886.9 |
1.72 |
1.74 |
1.77 |
1.8 |
1.64 |
1.99 |
|
Iceland |
33 301.3 |
49 277.9 |
49 163.5 |
49 673.7 |
50 722.3 |
46 439.4 |
54 831.8 |
1.41 |
1.4 |
1.44 |
1.51 |
1.19 |
1.8 |
|
Norway |
56 441.5 |
82 195.4 |
82 727.7 |
83 715.9 |
84 460.3 |
80 152.3 |
90 432.1 |
1.35 |
1.37 |
1.42 |
1.45 |
1.26 |
1.7 |
|
Sweden |
35 067.5 |
59 157.6 |
59 351.5 |
59 971.5 |
60 249.4 |
57 992.4 |
63 491.2 |
1.89 |
1.9 |
1.93 |
1.95 |
1.81 |
2.14 |
|
Canada |
37 068.1 |
53 050.4 |
53 858.4 |
54 741.2 |
55 122. |
52 252.5 |
60 058.4 |
1.29 |
1.34 |
1.4 |
1.43 |
1.23 |
1.74 |
|
France |
29 949.1 |
48 205.4 |
48 559.3 |
49 529.6 |
49 588.7 |
47 095. |
54 030.1 |
1.71 |
1.74 |
1.81 |
1.82 |
1.63 |
2.13 |
|
Germany |
35 039.3 |
51 489.9 |
51 495.5 |
52 545.5 |
53 347.6 |
48 395.7 |
59 698.2 |
1.38 |
1.38 |
1.46 |
1.51 |
1.16 |
1.92 |
|
Italy |
26 325.8 |
39 170.1 |
39 408.3 |
41 294.8 |
40 571.5 |
37 353.2 |
46 509.2 |
1.43 |
1.45 |
1.62 |
1.56 |
1.26 |
2.05 |
|
Japan |
31 398.5 |
48 051.2 |
48 203.3 |
50 484.3 |
.. |
.. |
.. |
1.53 |
1.54 |
1.71 |
.. |
.. |
.. |
|
United Kingdom |
32 910.9 |
57 048.6 |
57 746.7 |
59 074.3 |
59 870.5 |
54 552.4 |
67 609.9 |
1.98 |
2.03 |
2.11 |
2.16 |
1.82 |
2.6 |
|
United States |
44 832.5 |
71 706.6 |
72 425. |
74 404.6 |
73 535.1 |
70 974.1 |
79 726.6 |
1.69 |
1.73 |
1.83 |
1.78 |
1.65 |
2.08 |
|
Australia |
36 574.1 |
63 510. |
64 255.8 |
65 894.3 |
66 444.5 |
61 001.7 |
75 400.5 |
1.99 |
2.03 |
2.12 |
2.16 |
1.84 |
2.62 |
|
Austria |
36 388. |
58 011. |
57 859.7 |
59 001.6 |
59 951.7 |
54 402.6 |
66 735.3 |
1.68 |
1.67 |
1.74 |
1.8 |
1.45 |
2.19 |
|
Belgium |
33 045.7 |
50 645.8 |
51 148.2 |
52 441. |
52 605.1 |
49 011.5 |
58 656.6 |
1.54 |
1.57 |
1.66 |
1.67 |
1.42 |
2.07 |
|
Chile |
15 842.5 |
38 355. |
38 147.4 |
40 493.1 |
38 954.3 |
36 572.2 |
44 776.3 |
3.21 |
3.19 |
3.41 |
3.27 |
3.03 |
3.78 |
|
Czech Republic |
23 655.1 |
47 974.8 |
49 214.1 |
50 788.5 |
49 806.1 |
48 814.3 |
54 445.1 |
2.56 |
2.65 |
2.77 |
2.69 |
2.62 |
3.02 |
|
Estonia |
18 943.8 |
41 405.5 |
42 173.7 |
42 650.8 |
42 465.8 |
42 077.9 |
44 527.8 |
2.83 |
2.9 |
2.94 |
2.92 |
2.89 |
3.1 |
|
Greece |
20 626.2 |
39 304.6 |
38 639.9 |
40 417.9 |
39 397.1 |
36 937.5 |
43 454.5 |
2.33 |
2.27 |
2.43 |
2.34 |
2.1 |
2.7 |
|
Hungary |
16 932.6 |
30 359.2 |
31 414.8 |
32 091.9 |
31 561.5 |
31 716.1 |
33 619.8 |
2.11 |
2.23 |
2.31 |
2.25 |
2.27 |
2.48 |
|
Ireland |
36 662.7 |
54 969.4 |
54 087. |
55 975.2 |
56 100.1 |
50 226.4 |
63 391.2 |
1.46 |
1.4 |
1.52 |
1.53 |
1.13 |
1.97 |
|
Israel |
30 001.6 |
48 707.7 |
48 406.7 |
49 433.2 |
49 745.5 |
46 063.4 |
54 656.7 |
1.75 |
1.72 |
1.8 |
1.82 |
1.54 |
2.17 |
|
Korea |
30 870.3 |
59 549.1 |
61 198.7 |
64 171.2 |
62 398.5 |
59 805.4 |
70 633.6 |
2.37 |
2.47 |
2.65 |
2.55 |
2.39 |
3 |
|
Luxembourg |
67 356.5 |
95 187.6 |
94 449.7 |
97 157.2 |
96 570. |
90 669.3 |
106 177.6 |
1.24 |
1.21 |
1.32 |
1.29 |
1.07 |
1.64 |
|
Mexico |
12 992.1 |
24 536.8 |
26 141.2 |
28 312.1 |
26 936.7 |
25 596.6 |
33 692.1 |
2.3 |
2.53 |
2.82 |
2.64 |
2.45 |
3.46 |
|
Netherlands |
36 525.7 |
61 846.9 |
62 073.8 |
63 303.2 |
65 201. |
57 090.6 |
74 993.2 |
1.9 |
1.91 |
1.98 |
2.09 |
1.61 |
2.6 |
|
New Zealand |
26 114. |
42 383.2 |
42 778. |
43 704.5 |
44 257.2 |
40 493.5 |
43 958.8 |
1.74 |
1.78 |
1.86 |
1.9 |
1.58 |
1.88 |
|
Poland |
18 446.2 |
32 680. |
33 643.3 |
34 635.9 |
34 069.4 |
33 414.3 |
37 340. |
2.06 |
2.17 |
2.28 |
2.22 |
2.14 |
2.55 |
|
Portugal |
20 768.3 |
35 785.7 |
35 894.8 |
36 742.3 |
36 301.2 |
35 312.8 |
38 805.9 |
1.96 |
1.97 |
2.06 |
2.01 |
1.91 |
2.26 |
|
Slovak Republic |
21 023.5 |
39 225.1 |
40 450.8 |
41 752.2 |
40 814. |
40 447.1 |
44 311.3 |
2.25 |
2.36 |
2.48 |
2.4 |
2.36 |
2.7 |
|
Slovenia |
24 255.3 |
41 003.3 |
41 889.9 |
42 578.4 |
42 307.4 |
41 658.7 |
44 758.3 |
1.89 |
1.97 |
2.03 |
2.01 |
1.95 |
2.21 |
|
Spain |
26 318.7 |
38 033.1 |
37 563.3 |
38 546.8 |
38 395. |
35 993.5 |
41 713.4 |
1.32 |
1.28 |
1.37 |
1.36 |
1.12 |
1.66 |
|
Switzerland |
39 491.5 |
60 289.1 |
60 426.3 |
61 871.8 |
.. |
.. |
.. |
1.52 |
1.53 |
1.62 |
.. |
.. |
.. |
|
Turkey |
13 722.3 |
32 257.4 |
33 174.8 |
36 177.8 |
33 715.8 |
32 498.2 |
41 516. |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.52 |
3.26 |
3.13 |
4.03 |
|
United Kingdom |
32 910.9 |
57 048.6 |
57 746.7 |
59 074.3 |
59 870.5 |
54 552.4 |
67 609.9 |
1.98 |
2.03 |
2.11 |
2.16 |
1.82 |
2.6 |
|
United States |
44 832.5 |
71 706.6 |
72 425. |
74 404.6 |
73 535.1 |
70 974.1 |
79 726.6 |
1.69 |
1.73 |
1.83 |
1.78 |
1.65 |
2.08 |
Note: Projections using adjustments to working hours not available for Japan and Switzerland due to missing data on average usual weekly working hours. For the United States, working hours data based on dependent employees only. See Annex B for a description of the method and data used.
Source: OECD estimates based on OECD (2014), OECD Economic Outlook No. 95 Volume 2014 Issue 1, OECD Publishing, Paris (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eco_outlook-v2014-1-en), OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections Databases (http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?dataSetCode=EO), OECD population data and the OECD Employment Database (http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm).