This paper finds that coherent regulatory policies can boost investment in network industries of
OECD economies. Rate-of-return regulation is generally thought to result in overinvestment, while
incentive regulation is believed to entail underinvestment. Yet, previous empirical work has generally
found that the introduction of incentive regulation has not systematically changed investment in network
industries. According to the theoretical literature, regulatory uncertainty exposes both types of regimes to
the danger of underinvestment. However, regulatory uncertainty is arguably higher under rate-of-return
regulation because investment decisions (what can be included in the rate base) are usually evaluated in a
discretionary manner, while firms operating under incentive regulation are less affected by this behaviour.
In addition, incentive regulation encourages investment in cost-reducing technologies. Using Bayesian
model averaging techniques, this paper shows that incentive regulation implemented jointly with an
independent sector regulator (indicating lower regulatory uncertainty) has a strong positive impact on
investment in network industries. In addition, lower barriers to entry are also found to encourage sectoral
investment. These results support the importance of implementing policies in a coherent framework.
Infrastructure Investment in Network industries
The Role of Incentive Regulation and Regulatory Independence
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper19 June 202652 Pages
-
15 June 2026110 Pages
-
12 June 202658 Pages
-
Working paper
New evidence from the OECD Product Market Regulation Indicators
1 June 202657 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from a new dataset of monthly card spending for 12 countries and 9 spending categories
18 May 202661 Pages -
1 April 202662 Pages
-
1 April 202627 Pages
Related publications
-
29 June 202664 Pages