This paper tests the hypothesis that, by giving people more voice in the government decision-making process, fiscal decentralisation fosters social capital, measured in terms of interpersonal trust. Empirical evidence based on World Values Survey data and seemingly unrelated probit estimations for a cross-section of countries suggests that people living in federal/decentralised countries find it more important to have voice in government decisions than their counterparts living in unitary/centralised countries. Pro-voice attitudes are, in turn, associated with greater social capital. The cross-country estimations are complemented by country-specific regressions for Brazil and Indonesia on account of these countries. experiences with fiscal decentralisation. The results show that the cohorts of individuals that have been exposed to decentralisation are in general more pro-voice (and trustful of strangers in the case of Brazil) than their counterparts that have not been exposed to decentralisation. These findings are not driven by the effects of political liberalisation on people.s attitudes towards the importance of having voice in government decisions and interpersonal trust.
Does Fiscal Decentralisation Strengthen Social Capital?
Cross-Country Evidence and the Experiences of Brazil and Indonesia
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
30 September 202651 Pages
-
Working paper
The macroeconomic cost of climate change
4 September 202689 Pages -
17 July 202645 Pages
-
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
Working paper
Calibrating stochastic debt sustainability analysis models
15 July 202640 Pages -
30 June 202667 Pages
Related publications
-
17 July 202645 Pages
-
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
Working paper
Calibrating stochastic debt sustainability analysis models
15 July 202640 Pages