An early criticism of the Stability and Growth Pact has pointed to its asymmetric nature and the weak mechanisms to prevent politically-motivated fiscal policies: its constraints would bite in downswings but not in upswings, especially if in the latter the electoral cycle increases the temptation to run expansionary policies. We find that the experience of the initial years of EMU lends support to this criticism. Overall, unlike the experience in the run-up to EMU, fiscal policies had an expansionary bias, and a “genuine” discretionary boost took place in correspondence to political elections. Both sign and composition of such discretionary changes are in line with the predictions of the recent literature on electoral budget cycles. Closer fiscal surveillance may help detect early such behaviour, but it is unlikely to curb the incentives to run politically-motivated fiscal policies when elections approach ...
Discretionary Fiscal Policy and Elections
The Experience of the Early Years of EMU
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
30 September 202651 Pages
-
Working paper
The macroeconomic cost of climate change
4 September 202689 Pages -
17 July 202645 Pages
-
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
Working paper
Calibrating stochastic debt sustainability analysis models
15 July 202640 Pages -
30 June 202667 Pages
Related publications
-
17 July 202645 Pages
-
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
Working paper
Calibrating stochastic debt sustainability analysis models
15 July 202640 Pages