Certain growth-promoting policies can have negative side-effects by increasing the vulnerability of economies to financial crises. Typical examples are greater openness to financial flows or more liberalised financial markets. This paper investigates whether the growth benefits of policy reforms in these growth-enhancing areas, and others such as trade openness, exceed the possible costs of occasional, albeit potentially severe, crises for a sample of 100 developed and emerging economies from 1970 to 2010. The results suggest that the pro-growth effects of greater capital account openness outweigh the negative effects of a higher propensity to twin crises. Greater domestic financial liberalisation is associated with faster growth, but also with a higher propensity to systemic banking and twin crises. A free floating exchange rate and greater openness to trade, by reducing the likelihood of currency crises, are associated with higher growth. While pro-competitive product market regulations and lower corporate taxes are associated with higher growth, they do not seem to influence financial fragility via higher probability of crises.
Can Reforms Promoting Growth Increase Financial Fragility?
An Empirical Assessment
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
30 June 202667 Pages
-
Working paper19 June 202652 Pages
-
15 June 2026110 Pages
-
12 June 202658 Pages
-
Working paper
New evidence from the OECD Product Market Regulation Indicators
1 June 202657 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from a new dataset of monthly card spending for 12 countries and 9 spending categories
18 May 202661 Pages -
1 April 202662 Pages
-
1 April 202627 Pages
Related publications
-
30 June 202667 Pages
-
29 June 202664 Pages