Co-financing alongside multilateral development banks (MDBs) and development finance institutions (DFIs) is not only necessary to help meet the financing needs of emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs), it is smart business. ILX demonstrates the critical importance of transparency in financial and impact data for mobilising private investors into EMDEs.
ILX Fund: Development finance asset class proves stable and strong
Abstract
Context and challenge
Copy link to Context and challengeThe recent (2024) opening of the Global Emerging Markets Risk Database (GEMs) demonstrates that the development finance asset class – loans that multilateral development banks (MDBs) and development finance institutions (DFIs) make to sub-sovereign and the private sector in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) – has had a very stable and strong credit performance since 1998, based on relatively low defaults and high recovery rates. Co-financing alongside MDBs and DFIs is not only necessary to help meet the financing needs of EMDEs, it is smart business. ILX demonstrates the critical importance of transparency in financial and impact data for mobilising private investors into EMDEs.
Approach
Copy link to ApproachThe ILX Fund is a private credit fund managed by ILX Management B.V, and Amsterdam-based asset manager specialising in sustainable development co-investment strategies in emerging markets. ILX has raised two funds that co-invest alongside MDBs and DFIs: The first, ILX Fund I, was launched in 2022 with USD 1.05 billion in commitment, later expanded to USD 1.5 billion from Dutch pension funds. The second fund, ILX Fund II, was launched in 2024, raising USD 185 million from Danish pension funds, bringing the total assets under management to USD 1.7 billion.
ILX invests in syndicated loans originated by MDBs/DFIs (e.g. the EBRD, IFC, AfDB), and co-invests pari passu with these institutions in private sector projects across emerging markets. MDBs and DFIs thus enable ILX to attract institutional investors (e.g. pension funds) by offering investment opportunities in emerging markets and a proven track record of market-rate returns with development impact. Data from the GEMs Database helped to attract institutional investors to ILX Fund I, indicating that the development finance asset class was, in fact, attractive to institutional investors based on low defaults, high recovery rates, and high and stable earnings.
By leveraging MDBs and DFIs’ infrastructure, sourcing, and structuring capacity, ILX bridges the gap between institutional capital and development projects in emerging markets, delivering dual returns - financial and developmental – without relying on concessional finance to lower the investment risk for commercial investors. ILX confirms that loans originated by MDBs and DFIs is a viable asset class; the default rate is low, while the risk-adjusted returns are attractive.
Outcome and implications
Copy link to Outcome and implicationsThe ILX model is designed to be scaled, both in volume and in geographical reach, and scaling is part of its long-term vision. MDBs and DFIs have significant existing portfolios as well as pipelines of vetted, impactful projects. The model is tailored to meet the needs of pension funds and long-term institutional investors, providing investment grade structures, and measurable impact aligned with the SDGs. ILX can be replicated by other asset managers globally, with more partnerships forged with MDBs and DFIs, and broader investor participation. ILX has demonstrated the critical importance of transparency in financial and impact data through access to the GEMs Database. Scaling up will require more data transparency and further harmonised and standardised reporting.
Further information
Copy link to Further informationThis work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Member countries of the OECD.
This can include intellectual or funding contributions.
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.
Note by the Republic of Türkiye
The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Türkiye recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Türkiye shall preserve its position concerning the “Cyprus issue”.
Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union
The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Türkiye. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
Kosovo: This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244/99 and the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on Kosovo’s declaration of independence.
Photo credits: © imagedepotpro/gettyimages.
© OECD 2025
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. By using this work, you accept to be bound by the terms of this licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Attribution – you must cite the work.
Translations – you must cite the original work, identify changes to the original and add the following text: In the event of any discrepancy between the original work and the translation, only the text of original work should be considered valid.
Adaptations – you must cite the original work and add the following text: This is an adaptation of an original work by the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this adaptation should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its Member countries.
Third-party material – the licence does not apply to third-party material in the work. If using such material, you are responsible for obtaining permission from the third party and for any claims of infringement.
You must not use the OECD logo, visual identity or cover image without express permission or suggest the OECD endorses your use of the work.
Any dispute arising under this licence shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) Arbitration Rules 2012. The seat of arbitration shall be Paris (France). The number of arbitrators shall be one.
Related content
-
5 March 20265 Pages
-
1 October 20254 Pages