In their successful attempts to engineer a rapid turnaround of the public finances, fiscal authorities focused initially on measures that did not require congressional approval. This included improvements in public spending efficiency but also discretionary cuts in capital spending which, if maintained over a long period of time, may have damaging effects on the quality of infrastructure and productivity growth in the long term. While improving Argentina’s fiscal position in the coming years is as a precondition for re-gaining access to international capital markets, fiscal policy will require further fine-tuning to maintain fiscal prudence while boosting potential growth.
Primary budget surpluses have been recorded almost every month in 2024, something Argentina had not seen since 2010. The primary fiscal surplus reached 1.8% of GDP in 2024, a significant turnaround from the 2.9% deficit observed in 2023 (Figure 3). The successful fiscal adjustment has already led to a significant drop in Argentina’s country risk premium. For 2025, fiscal authorities target a 1.6% primary surplus. A package of tax measures approved in June 2024 is already helping to improve fiscal outcomes in the near-term.
Beyond the significant achievements already made, scope remains for further reforms both on the spending and the revenue side of public accounts. Argentina’s public expenditure is high in international comparison and there is scope for enhancing spending efficiency in several areas. One avenue for further progress is to continue cutting back inefficient subsidies. Another area where Argentina stands out is its sizeable public sector, despite recent staff cuts at the federal level, while perceptions of public services are weak. Digitalisation could create opportunities to reap further efficiency gains in the public sector. Improving the execution of public works while sharing some of the risks with the private sector could be another source of fiscal savings.
Argentina’s tax system is complex and includes a plethora of distortionary instruments. Continuous increases in public spending over the years have been partly financed by new distortionary taxes, often meant to be temporary and to respond to short-term urgent financing needs. These have left their mark on investment and consumption decisions and the allocation of resources across the economy.
Phasing out the most distortive taxes requires identifying alternative revenue sources, so as not to jeopardise on-going fiscal consolidation efforts. Expanding the personal income tax base holds significant potential for raising revenues in a progressive way and would allow reducing other taxes whose distributional effect is unclear. Eliminating/reducing VAT exemptions and reduced rates could bring additional fiscal revenues. Tax compliance could be improved by strengthening and modernising the tax administration, including through improvements in information systems. Besides challenges with compliance, corporate taxes are characterised by targeted tax regimes for specific sectors and locations, which could be re-assessed.
Argentina’s fiscal federalism features a significant imbalance between provinces own resources and their expenditures. As a result, a complex system of intergovernmental transfers has been developed to distribute federal tax revenues to the provinces. Revenue sharing with provinces does not necessarily reflect their population weight or spending needs. These automatic transfers are complemented by discretionary transfers that have frequently been used to create political coalitions. Improving the structure of the federal-provincial transfer mechanisms once the public finances have been put on a more sustainable footing would help to improve public-sector efficiency and reduce territorial disparities.
Provinces should be encouraged to participate in the on-going fiscal consolidation effort and to comply with fiscal rules. Adherence to fiscal rules at the provincial level is voluntary and two provinces have not yet agreed to these rules.