[22] Abas, A. et al. (2023), “A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges”, Environmental Development, Vol. 46, pp. 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100853.
[52] Acemoglu, D. and S. Johnson (2023), Rebalancing AI, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2023/12/Rebalancing-AI-Acemoglu-Johnson.
[54] Arana-Catania, M. et al. (2021), “Citizen participation and machine learning for a better democracy”, Digital Government: Research and Practice, Vol. 2/3, pp. 1-22.
[27] Ayano, T. (2021), “A survey of methods for evaluating mini‑publics”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 5/1, pp. 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-020-00183-3.
[106] Bakhanova, E. et al. (2023), “Gamification Framework for Participatory Modeling: A Proposal”, Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 32, pp. 1167-1182, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10726-023-09838-w.
[55] Berditchevskaia, A. and P. Baeck (2020), The Future of Minds and Machines: How artificial intelligence can enhance collective intelligence.
[1] Berryhill, J., T. Bourgery and A. Hanson (2018), “Blockchains Unchained: Blockchain Technology and its Use in the Public Sector”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 28, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3c32c429-en.
[5] Berryhill, J. et al. (2019), Hello, World: Artificial Intelligence and its use in the Public Sector, OECD Publishing.
[120] Black, A. et al. (2014), Civic Innovation Beyond Civic Technology, https://www.newamerica.org/oti/blog/civic-innovation-beyond-civic-technology/.
[103] Boswell, J. (2021), “Seeing Like a Citizen: How Being a Participant in a Seeing Like a Citizen: How Being a Participant in a Citizens Assembly Changed Everything I thought I Knew about Deliberative Mini-Publics”, Journal of Deliberative Democracy, Vol. 17/2, pp. 1-12, https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.975.
[91] Burmaoglu, S., O. Sartenaer and A. Porter (2019), “Conceptual definition of technology emergence: A long journey from philosophy of science to science policy”, Technology in Society, Vol. 59.
[102] Cabrera, V. (2022), Observatório das Eleições, https://observatoriodaseleicoes.com.br/2022/09/22/cresce-a-confianca-na-contagem-dos-votos-em-2022-bolsonaristas-confiam-em-menor-proporcao/.
[141] Candy, S. and J. Dunagan (2017), “Designing an experiential scenario: The People Who Vanished”, Futures, Vol. 86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.006.
[40] Cardullo, P. (ed.) (2019), What is Civic Tech? Defining a Practice of Technical Pluralism, Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
[112] Carson, L. and S. Elstub (2019), Carson, L., & Elstub, S. (2019). Comparing Participatory and Deliberative Democracy, https://www.newdemocracy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/RD-Note-Comparing-Participatory-and-Deliberative-Democracy.pdf.
[76] Chander, S. (2020), Data Racism: a New Frontier, https://www.enar-eu.org/Data-racism-a-new-frontier/.
[126] Chatwin, M. (2020), “Improving Monitoring and Evaluation in the Civic Tech Ecosystem: Applying Contribution Analysis to Digital Transformation”, JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, Vol. 12(2), pp. 216-241, https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v12i2.
[97] Courant, D. (2021), “Citizens’ Assemblies for Referendums and Constitutional Reforms: Is There an “Irish Model” for Deliberative Democracy?”, Frontiers in Political Science, Vol. 2, pp. 1-20, https://doi.org/doi: 10.3389/fpos.2020.591983.
[128] Cuaou, C. (2019), Applying artificial intelligence to citizen participation: the Youth4Climate case study, https://www.citizenlab.co/blog/civic-engagement/youth-for-climate-case-study/ (accessed on 23 May 2024).
[124] Dabo, A. and E. Pouyé (2022), Assessing Civic Tech That Works to Build #TheAfricaWeWant*: Citizen-led tech for impact that can help African governments deliver better services, European Democracy Hub, https://www.bosch-stiftung.de/sites/default/files/publ.
[135] David, N., J. McNutt and J. Justice (2018), Smart Cities, Transparency, Civic Technology and Reinventing Government.
[39] DemocracyNext (2023), DemocracyNext: Assembling an Assembly Guide, https://assemblyguide.demnext.org/.
[15] DigitalCatapult (2024), Everything you need to know about immersive technology, https://www.digicatapult.org.uk/expertise/blogs/post/everything-to-know-about-immersive-technology/.
[81] Dulong de Rosnay, M. and A. Stalder (2020), “Digital commons”, Internet Policy Review, Vol. 9/4, https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1530.
[20] Edelenbos, J. (1999), “Design and Management of Participatory Public Policy Making”, Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, Vol. 1/4, pp. 569-576, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719039900000027.
[35] Escobar, O. (2012), Public Dialogue and Deliberation: A communication perspective for public engagement practitioners, Edinburgh Beltane Open Minds, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
[110] EU Comission Joint Research Center (2021), Participatory and Deliberative Democracy.
[94] European Commission (2023), Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions On Defence Of Democracy.
[65] Evers, S. et al. (2023), “Designing healthy public spaces: A participatory approach through immersive virtual reality”, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-4-24-2023.
[28] Font, J., S. Pasadas del Amo and G. Smith (2016), “Tracing the Impact of Proposals from Participatory Processes: Methodological Challenges and Substantive Lessons”, Journal of Public Deliberation, Vol. 12/1, https://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol12/iss1/art3.
[53] French Government (2019), Grand Débat, https://granddebat.fr/.
[98] Fung, A. (2015), “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 75/4, pp. 513-522, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24757808.
[41] García, D. and E. Al. (2023), Democracy Technologies in Europe: Online Participation, Deliberation and Voting, Innovation in Politics Institute, https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/democracy-technologies-europe.
[78] García-Orosa, B. (2021), “Disinformation, social media, bots, and astroturfing: the fourth wave of digital democracy”, Profesional de la información, Vol. 30/6, https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.nov.03.
[82] Gill, I., P. Baeck and A. Whittington (2022), “Designing the Collective Intelligence Commons”, The Centre for Collective Intelligence Design/Agence Française de Développement Group.
[26] Gilman, M. (2022), “Beyond Window Dressing: Public Participation for Marginalized Communities in the Datafied Society”, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 91/2, pp. 503-555, https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol91/iss2/7.
[10] Godhe, M. and L. Goode (2018), “Critical Future Studies – A Thematic Introduction”, Culture Unbound, Vol. 10/2, pp. 151–162.
[138] Government of Brazil (2024), Progresso do Plano Clima, https://brasilparticipativo.presidencia.gov.br/processes/planoclima/.
[74] Government of Iceland (2023), Head Start for Icelandic, https://www.government.is/diplomatic-missions/embassy-article/2023/03/14/Head-start-for-Icelandic/ (accessed on 23 May 2024).
[79] Government of the Netherlands (2022), The Algorithm Register of the Dutch Government, https://algoritmes.overheid.nl/en (accessed on 23 May 2024).
[64] Haarseim, T. (2023), Decidim Partners with Vocdoni to Offer Blockchain Voting, https://democracy-technologies.org/voting/blockchain-voting-decidim-vocdoni/.
[16] Hupont Torres, I. et al. (2024), Next Generation Virtual Worlds: Societal, Technological, Economic and Policy Challenges for the EU, https://doi.org/10.2760/51579.
[25] Ianniello, M., S. Iacuzzi and L. Brusati (2019), “Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation: a systematic review”, Public Management, Vol. 21/1, pp. 21-46, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1438499.
[80] ICANN (2025), About the ICANN Community, https://www.icann.org/en/community (accessed on 30 January 2025).
[33] International IDEA (2024), PERCEPTIONS OF DEMOCRACY: A Survey about How People Assess Democracy around the World, International IDEA, https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2024.24.
[69] International Republican Institute (2023), Sustaining and Scaling Civic and Government Technology: A White Paper on Challenges, Best Practices and Recommendations, https://www.iri.org/resources/sustaining-and-scaling-civic-and-government-technology/.
[139] IPU (2019), Artificial Intelligence (AI) in parliaments, https://www.ipu.org/innovation-tracker/story/artificial-intelligence-innovation-in-parliaments.
[114] Kimaid, L. (2024), Artificial Intelligence-Driven Archibot: Transforming Access to European Union Parliament Archives, https://library.bussola-tech.co/p/artificial-intelligence-archibot-eu-parliament.
[142] Klein, M. and N. Majdoubi (2024), “The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations”, World Wide Web, Vol. 27/31, pp. 1-30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-024-01269-0.
[45] Knight Foundation (2013), The Emergence of Civic Tech: Investments in a Growing Field, https://www.slideshare.net/knightfoundation/knight-civictech.
[67] Knight Foundation and Rita Allen Foundation (2017), Scaling Civic Tech: Paths to a Sustainable Future, https://knightfoundation.org/features/civictechbiz/ (accessed on 17 August 2023).
[77] Kreps, S. (2024), “The potential impact of emerging technologies on democratic representation: Evidence from a field experiment.”, New Media & Society, Vol. 26/12, pp. 6918-6937, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231160526.
[21] Kurkela, K. et al. (2024), “Citizen participation as an organisational challenge in local government”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 37/1, pp. 124-140, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2022-0179.
[130] Landemore, H. (2022), “Landemore, H. (2022). Can AI bring deliberative democracy to the masses?”, HAI Weekley Seminar, pp. 1-35.
[13] Lindman, J. et al. (2020), “The uncertain promise of blockchain for government”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 43, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d031cd67-en.
[3] Lindman, J. et al. (2020), “The uncertain promise of blockchain for government”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 43, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d031cd67-en.
[46] Mabi, C. (2017), “Citoyen hackeur: Enjeux politiques des Civic Tech”, La Vie des Idées, https://laviedesidees.fr/Citoyen-hackeur (accessed on 17 August 2023).
[129] Make.org (2024), Convention citoyenne sur la fin de vie : le CESE avec Make.org propose au grand public et aux parlementaires de mieux s’approprier les débats des citoyens grâce à l’intelligence artificielle, https://about.make.org/post/convention-citoyenne-sur-la-fin-de-vie-le-cese-avec-make-org-propose-au-grand-public-et-aux-parlementaires-de-mieux-sapproprier-les-debats-des-citoyens-grace-a-lintelligence-artificielle (accessed on 23 May 2024).
[107] Make.org (2024), Make.org Blog, https://about.make.org/articles-en/forum-against-fakes-a-broad-online-citizen-participation-to-support-the-work-of-a-new-citizens-panel-in-germany-on-how-to-tackle-misinformation.
[111] Mejia Galvan, M. (2023), Citizens are shaping EU’s main investment policy, https://medium.com/participo/citizens-are-shaping-eus-main-investment-policy-1271d9fcaed3.
[84] Mellon, J., T. Peixoto and F. Sjoberg (2022), “The Haves and the Have Nots: Civic Technologies and the Pathways to Government Responsiveness”, World Bank Working Papers.
[58] Miller, C. (2024), Reclaiming Technology for Democracy.
[99] Mochtak, M., C. Lesschaeve and J. Glaurdic (2021), “Voting and winning: perceptions of electoral integrity in consolidating democracies”, Democratization, Vol. 28/8, pp. 1423-1441, https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2021.1918111.
[49] Modekurty, S. et al. (2019), “A Timeline of Civic Tech Tells a Data-Driven Story of the Field”, Civic TechCivic Techde, https://civictech.guide/a-timeline-of-civic-tech-tells-a-data-driven-story-of-the-field/.
[113] Moldes, C. (2018), Chat bot lets Russians detained at protests request legal assistance, https://globalvoices.org/2018/09/25/chat-bot-lets-russians-detained-at-protests-request-legal-assistance/.
[8] Moore, G. (2014), Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers, Harper Business Essentials, https://www.harpercollins.com/products/crossing-the-chasm-3rd-edition-geoffrey-a-moore?variant=32130444066850.
[101] Mozilla Foundation (2024), Election Manipulation in Brazil’s 2022 General Elections: The Role of WhatsApp and Telegram on the Attacks Against Electoral Integrity and the Threats to Democracy, https://doi.org/Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
[137] Municipality of Barcelona (2023), Foro Joven BCN, https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/joves/es/canal/forum-jove-bcn.
[44] Nesta (2021), Collective crisis intelligence for frontline humanitarian response, https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Nesta_Collective_crisis_intelligence_for_frontline_humanitarian_response_Final.pdf.
[123] New America (2023), Public Interest Technology, https://www.newamerica.org/pit/about/.
[90] Nightingale, P. (2014), “What is Technology? Six Definitions and Two Pathologies”, SWPS 2014-2019.
[38] OECD (2024), Anti-Corruption and Integrity Outlook 2024, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/968587cd-en.
[85] OECD (2024), Exploring New Frontiers of Citizen Participation in the Policy Cycle, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/programmes/reinforcing-democracy-initiative/Exploring-New-Frontiers-of-Citizen-Participation-Discussion-Paper.pdf.
[146] OECD (2024), Facts not Fakes: Tackling Disinformation, Strengthening Information Integrity, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d909ff7a-en.
[4] OECD (2024), “Framework for Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 165, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0248ead5-en.
[11] OECD (2024), “Governing with Artificial Intelligence: Are governments ready?”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, https://doi.org/10.1787/26324bc2-en.
[17] OECD (2024), OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2024 (Volume 1): Embracing the Technology Frontier, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a1689dc5-en.
[23] OECD (2024), “OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions - 2024 Results”, in OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions - 2024 Results, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-survey-on-drivers-of-trust-in-public-institutions-2024-results_9a20554b-en.html.
[36] OECD (2024), Promoting Public Deliberation in the Basque Country in Spain.
[37] OECD (2024), Recommendation of the Council on Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying and Influence, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0379.
[83] OECD (2023), OECD Deliberative Democracy Database, https://airtable.com/appP4czQlAU1My2M3/shrX048tmQLl8yzdc/tblrttW98WGpdnX3Y/viwX5ZutDDGdDMEep?blocks=hide.
[31] OECD (2023), OECD Public Governance Reviews: Czech Republic: Towards a More Modern and Effective Public Administration, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/41fd9e5c-en.
[145] OECD (2023), Open Government for Stronger Democracies: A Global Assessment, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/5478db5b-en.
[30] OECD (2023), Open Government Review of Romania, https://doi.org/10.1787/ff20b2d4-en.
[86] OECD (2022), “Building Trust and Reinforcing Democracy”, in Building Trust and Reinforcing Democracy: Preparing the Ground for Government Action, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/building-trust-and-reinforcing-democracy_76972a4a-en.html.
[153] OECD (2022), Building Trust to Reinforce Democracy: Main Findings from the 2021 OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions, Building Trust in Public Institutions, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b407f99c-en.
[116] OECD (2022), Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes.
[19] OECD (2022), OECD Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f765caf6-en.
[155] OECD (2022), OECD Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f765caf6-en.
[29] OECD (2022), Open Government Review of Brazil : Towards an Integrated Open Government Agenda, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3f9009d4-en.
[151] OECD (2022), Open Government Review of Brazil : Towards an Integrated Open Government Agenda, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3f9009d4-en.
[12] OECD (2022), Recommendation of the Council on Blockchain and Other Distributed Ledger Technologies.
[70] OECD (2022), The Protection and Promotion of Civic Space: Strengthening Alignment with International Standards and Guidance, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/the-protection-and-promotion-of-civic-space_d234e975-en.html.
[154] OECD (2022), The Protection and Promotion of Civic Space: Strengthening Alignment with International Standards and Guidance, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d234e975-en.
[32] OECD (2021), “Eight ways to institutionalise deliberative democracy”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 12, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/4fcf1da5-en.
[89] OECD (2021), Evaluation Guidelines for Representative Deliberative Processes, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/10ccbfcb-en.
[118] OECD (2021), OECD Database of Representative Deliberative Processes and Institutions.
[152] OECD (2021), OECD Report on Public Communication: The Global Context and the Way Forward, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/22f8031c-en.
[93] OECD (2021), Recommendation of the Council for Agile Regulatory Governance to Harness Innovation, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0464#dates.
[51] OECD (2020), “Digital Government Index: 2019 results”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 03, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en.
[144] OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.
[34] OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.
[88] OECD (2020), OECD Public Integrity Handbook, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ac8ed8e8-en.
[140] OECD (2020), “The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six dimensions of a Digital Government”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 02, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en.
[143] OECD (2019), Institutions Guaranteeing Access to Information: OECD and MENA Region, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/e6d58b52-en.
[18] OECD (2017), Recommendation of the Council on Open Government, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0438.
[108] OECD (2017), Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0435.
[50] OECD (2004), Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264019492-en.
[43] OECD (forthcoming), Civic Tech for Democracy.
[42] OECD (forthcoming), Getting Civic Tech Right for Democracy.
[87] OECD (forthcoming), “Moving Transparency and Accountability Forward”, WPOG Working paper.
[136] OEDC (n.d.), .
[100] Oladoyinbo, T. (2024), “The Effect of Data Information Security In Digital Voting and Electoral Processes”, IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, Vol. 26/2, pp. 11-16, http://www.iosrjournals.org.
[109] Open Government Partnership (2019), Citizen Participation, https://www.opengovpartnership.org/glossary/citizen-participation/.
[117] Paice, A. (2022), “Creating an online conversation between a nation and a mini-public: a case study on Polis & the Austrian Citizens’ Climate Council”, Co-Intelligence Institute, https://www.co-intelligence.institute/case-study-polis-c.
[62] Park, S., M. Specter and N. Narula (2020), “Going from bad to worse: from Internet voting to blockchain voting”, Journal of Cybersecurity.
[72] Peixoto, T., O. Canuto and L. Jordan (2024), AI and the Future of Government: Unexpected Effects and Critical Challenges.
[61] Peixoto, T. and T. Steinberg (2019), “Citizen Engagement: Emerging Digital Technologies Create New Risks and Value”, World Bank.
[7] Pink, S. et al. (2020), “Design anthropology for emerging technologies: Trust and sharing in autonomous driving futures”, Design Studies, Vol. 69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.04.002.
[132] Pogrebinschi, T. (2017), “Digital Innovation in Latin America: How Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Peru have been experimenting with E-participation”, openDemocracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/democraciaabierta/digital-innovation-in-latin-am.
[48] Political Watch (2022), Más de 10 años de CivicTech: Logros Alcanzados Y Propuestas Para La Próxima Década.
[147] Porter, A. et al. (2002), “Measuring national ‘emerging technology’ capabilities”, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 189-200, https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781781001.
[6] Rodriguez, A., M. Green and M. Lubomira Kubica (2021), Legal Challenges in the New Digital Age.
[73] Romberg, J. and T. Escher (2024), “Making Sense of Citizens’ Input through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Methods for Computational Text Analysis to Support the Evaluation of Contributions in Public Participatio”, Digital Government: Research and Practice, pp. 1-30, https://doi.org/10.1145/3603254.
[47] Rumbul, R. (2019), “The Third Age of Civic Tech”, mySociety, https://web.archive.org/web/20201030184447/https://tictec.mysociety.org/2019/presentation/rebecca-mysociety.
[125] Rumbul, R. (2015), “Who benefits from Civic Technology? Demographics and public attitudes research into the users of civil technologies”, mySociety, https://research.mysociety.org/media/outputs/demographics-report.pdf.
[56] Schneider, B. and N. Sanders (2023), AI could shore up democracy - here’s one way, https://theconversation.com/ai-could-shore-up-democracy-heres-one-way-207278 (accessed on 23 May 2024).
[66] Seoul Metropolitan Government (n.d.), Metaverse Seoul, the New Continent of Seoul, https://english.seoul.go.kr/policy/smart-city/metaverse-blockchain/.
[121] Simon, J. et al. (2017), “Digital Democracy: the tools transforming political engagement”, Nesta, https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/digital_democracy.pdf.
[119] Simon, J. et al. (2017), “Digital Democracy: the tools transforming political engagement”, Nesta, https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/digital_democracy.pdf.
[60] Sitra (2023), FAQ - What is the ‘What do you think, Finland’ experiment all about?, https://www.sitra.fi/en/articles/faq-what-is-the-what-do-you-think-finland-experiment-all-about/.
[24] Slaev, A. et al. (2019), “Overcoming the failures of citizen participation: The relevance of the liberal approach in planning”, Planning Theory, Vol. 18/4, pp. 448-469, https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219848472.
[92] Stahl, B. (2011), “What Does the Future Hold? A Critical View of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies and Their Social Consequences”, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21364-9_5.
[148] Tabor, H. (2020), “Civic Engagement, Autism and Deliberative Democracy: Prioritizing the Inclusion of Marginalized Perspectives”, The American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 20/4, pp. 41-43, https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1730620.
[96] Tambouris, E., A. Macintosh and F. Bannister (eds.) (2014), Conceptualising Trust in E-Participation Contexts, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44914-1.
[57] Tessler, M. et al. (2024), “AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation”, Science, Vol. 386/6719, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq2852.
[59] The Computational Democracy Project (2024), Pol.is, https://compdemocracy.org/.
[104] The Guardian (2019), “’Transparency and fairness’: Irish readers on why the Citizens’ Assembly worked”, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/22/irish-readers-citizens-assembly-worked-brexit (accessed on 31 July 2024).
[133] The Open Source Initiative (2023), The Open Source Definition, https://opensource.org/osd/.
[9] Tidd, J. and J. Bessant (2005), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market And Organizational Change, John Wiley & Sons, https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Managing+Innovation%3A+Integrating+Technological%2C+Market+and+Organizational+Change%2C+7th+Edition-p-9781119713302.
[127] Tolosa City Council (2022), Governance, Participation, and Transparency Ordinance, https://udala.tolosa.eus/sites/default/files/BEHIN%20BETIKO%20ONARPENA%20PUBLIKAZIOA%20GAO_1.pdf.
[149] Tsai, L. et al. (2024), “Generative AI for Pro-Democracy Platforms”, An MIT Exploration of Generative AI, https://doi.org/10.21428/e4baedd9.5aaf489a.
[95] U.S. Government (2021), Key Findings and Recommendations from the Joint Report of the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security on Foreign Interference Targeting Election Infrastructure or Political Organization, Campaign, or Candidate Infrastructure Related, https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1376761/dl.
[2] Ubaldi, B. et al. (2019), “State of the art in the use of emerging technologies in the public sector”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 31, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/932780bc-en.
[14] Ubaldi, B. et al. (2019), “State of the art in the use of emerging technologies in the public sector”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance.
[71] UNEP (2024), AI has an environmental problem. Here’s what the world can do about that, https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/ai-has-environmental-problem-heres-what-world-can-do-about.
[131] United Kingdom Government (2024), A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation: government response, https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/ai-regulation-a-pro-innovation-approach-policy-proposals/outcome/a-pro-innovation-approach-to-ai-regulation-government-response#introduction.
[134] United Nations (2021), on a Proposed UN Centralised Database of Open-Source Appropriate Technologies, http://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ecosoc_ res_2021d30_Note_OpenSource_en.pdf.
[75] University of Turku (2023), TurkuNLP, https://turkunlp.org/ (accessed on 23 May 2024).
[105] Ville de Paris (2023), L’Assemblée citoyenne de Paris en 8 questions, https://cdn.paris.fr/paris/2023/05/03/faq-extracommunautaires-assemblee-citoyenne_vf-1-TC7g.pdf.
[63] Vocdoni (2021), Introducing the Vocdoni Ballot Protocol, https://blog.vocdoni.io/vocdoni-ballot-protocol.
[115] Welker, Y. (2023), Generative AI holds great potential for those with disabilities - but it needs policy to shape it, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/11/generative-ai-holds-potential-disabilities/ (accessed on 24 May 2024).
[122] World Bank (2022), CivicTech: Transparency, Engagement, and Collaboration for Better Governance, https://doi.org/License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
[150] Zerilli, J. et al. (2019), “Algorithmic Decision-Making and the Control Problem”, Minds and Machines - Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Vol. 29, pp. 555-578, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09513-7.
[68] Zhang, W. et al. (2021), “A Review of Research on Civic Technology: Definitions, Theories, History and Insights.”, ACM Comput. Surv., https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.11461.pdf.
