The correlation between a firm’s size and its productivity level varies considerably across OECD countries,
suggesting that some countries are more successful at channelling resources to high productivity firms than
others. Accordingly, we examine the extent to which regulations affecting product, labour and credit
markets influence productivity, via their effect on the efficiency of resource allocation. Our results suggest
that there is an economically and statistically robust negative relationship between policy-induced frictions
and productivity, though the specific channel depends on the policy considered. In the case of employment
protection legislation, product market regulations (including barriers to entry and bankruptcy legislation)
and restrictions on foreign direct investment, this is largely traceable to the worsening of allocative
efficiency (i.e. a lower correspondence between a firm’s size and its productivity level). By contrast,
financial market under-development tends to be associated with a higher fraction of low productivity
relative to high productivity firms. Furthermore, stringent regulations are more disruptive to resource
allocation in more innovative sectors, though the nature of innovation turns out to be important.
Public Policy and Resource Allocation
Evidence from Firms in OECD Countries
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
17 July 202645 Pages
-
Working paper
Calibrating stochastic debt sustainability analysis models
15 July 202640 Pages -
30 June 202667 Pages
-
Working paper19 June 202652 Pages
-
15 June 2026110 Pages
Related publications
-
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
17 July 202645 Pages
-
Working paper
Calibrating stochastic debt sustainability analysis models
15 July 202640 Pages -
10 July 202611 Pages