[27] BSR (2022), Sales partners and human rights due diligence in the technology sector: Best practices brief, https://www.bsr.org/reports/Sales_Partner_-_Best_Practice_Brief.pdf.
[19] Centre for the Governance of AI (2023), Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance: A survey of expert opinion, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.07153.
[22] Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) (n.d.), Guiding Principles for C2PA Designs and Specifications, https://c2pa.org/principles/.
[38] European Center for Not-for-Profit Law (2023), Framework for Meaningful Engagement, https://oecd.ai/en/catalogue/tools/framework-for-meaningful-engagement-of-external-stakeholders-in-ai-development.
[14] European Union (2024), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 an, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401689.
[15] G7 (2023), Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Advanced AI Systems, https://www.soumu.go.jp/hiroshimaaiprocess/en/documents.html.
[5] ILO (2023), Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, https://www.ilo.org/publications/tripartite-declaration-principles-concerning-multinational-enterprises-and-3.
[24] Institute for AI Policy and Strategy (IAPS) (2023), Deployment corrections: An incident response framework for frontier AI, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/64edf8e7f2b10d716b5ba0e1/t/651c397fc04af033499df9f8/1696348544356/Deployment+corrections_+an+incident+response+framework+for+frontier+AI+models.pdf.
[25] ISO (2023), ISO/IEC 27035-1:2023: Information security incident management, https://www.iso.org/standard/78973.html.
[36] ISO (2018), ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines, https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html.
[41] NIST (2024), NIST AI 600-1 Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile, https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.600-1.
[39] OECD (2025), RBC Spotlight: Due diligence in electronics and vehicle manufacturing, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/responsible-business-conduct-spotlights_03a75bf9-en/due-diligence-in-electronics-and-vehicle-manufacturing_993bb959-en.html.
[28] OECD (2025), “Towards a common reporting framework for AI incidents”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 34, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f326d4ac-en.
[20] OECD (2024), “AI, data governance and privacy: Synergies and areas of international co-operation”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 22, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2476b1a4-en.
[34] OECD (2024), “Defining AI incidents and related terms”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 16, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d1a8d965-en.
[2] OECD (2024), Explanatory memorandum on the updated OECD definition of an AI system, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/explanatory-memorandum-on-the-updated-oecd-definition-of-an-ai-system_623da898-en.
[6] OECD (2024), “Explanatory memorandum on the updated OECD definition of an AI system”, OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 8, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/623da898-en.
[9] OECD (2024), Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449.
[17] OECD (2023), “Advancing accountability in AI: Governing and managing risks throughout the lifecycle for trustworthy AI”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 349, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2448f04b-en.
[10] OECD (2023), Common Guideposts to Promote Interoperability in AI Risk Management, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/ba602d18-en.pdf?expires=1700737987&id=id&accname=ocid84004878&checksum=74F08ECC1794AF825ADFFE292B62FD50.
[1] OECD (2023), OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/81f92357-en.
[7] OECD (2022), Measuring environmental impacts of AI compute and applications, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/7babf571-en.pdf?expires=1716997196&id=id&accname=ocid84004878&checksum=C13188D88E3A07543BCC1AAAD636B592.
[13] OECD (2022), “OECD Framework for the Classification of AI systems”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 323, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/cb6d9eca-en.
[37] OECD (2022), Report on the Implementation of the Recommendation of the OECD Council on Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0386.
[31] OECD (2022), Responsible Business Conduct Due Diligence for Project and Asset Finance Transactions, https://doi.org/10.1787/952805e9-en.
[3] OECD (2018), OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/15f5f4b3-en.
[40] OECD (2016), OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Third Edition, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264252479-en.
[11] OECD (2015), Competition Law and Responsible Business Conduct, https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/global-forum/2015GFRBC-Competition-Law-RBC.pdf.
[16] OECD (2015), Competition Law and Responsible Business Conduct, https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/global-forum/2015GFRBC-Competition-Law-RBC.pdf.
[18] OECD (2013), Guidelines governing the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0188.
[12] OECD (n.d.), Catalogue of tools and metrics for trustworthy AI, https://oecd.ai/en/catalogue/tools.
[29] OECD (n.d.), Worldwide investments in AI, https://oecd.ai/en/data?selectedArea=investments-in-ai-and-data (accessed on 1 October 2025).
[8] Partnership on AI (2021), Responsible Sourcing of Data Enrichment Services, http://partnershiponai.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/PAI-Responsible-Sourcing-of-Data-Enrichment-Services.pdf.
[23] Partnership on AI (n.d.), Responsible Practices for Synthetic Media, https://syntheticmedia.partnershiponai.org/#read_the_framework.
[26] Solaiman, I. (2023), The Gradient of Generative AI Release: Methods and Considerations, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.04844.
[32] UN OHCHR (2021), OHCHR Accountability and Remedy Project: Meeting the UNGPs’ Effectiveness Criteria, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/arp-note-meeting-effectiveness-criteria.pdf.
[33] UN OHCHR B-Tech Project (2021), Access to remedy and the technology sector: Basic concepts and principles, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Business/B-Tech/access-to-remedy-concepts-and-principles.pdf.
[4] United Nations Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (2012), United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, https://www.ohchr.org/en/publications/reference-publications/guiding-principles-business-and-human-rights.
[21] US Department of Commerce. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2024), AI Accountability Policy Report, https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ntia-ai-report-final.pdf.
[35] US National Institute of Standards and Technology (2023), AI Risk Management Framework 1.0, https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1.
[30] World Benchmarking Alliance (2023), Digital Inclusion Collective Impact Coalition 2023 Progress Report, https://www.worldbenchmarkingalliance.org/impact/digital-inclusion-collective-impact-coalition-progress-report/.