|
Subjective evaluation of tender (e.g. lack of justification for the selection of the winning offer, award criteria applied during evaluation differ from those included in the tender documents) |
Corruption and/or conflict of interest |
Fraud and corruption |
Develop clear, measurable award criteria as much as possible and establish procedures providing for detailed justification of the evaluation and scoring of criteria
Develop and implement training programmes focused on integrity in public procurement
Create comprehensive guidelines or manuals specifically addressing integrity issues in procurement
Disclose all potential conflict of interests through formal declarations and consider
disqualifying members from participation to avoid any possible biases
Conduct regular controls to ensure compliance |
|
Poor quality of tender documents |
Operational |
Use HSPPA templates and checklists to prepare tender documents
Have tender documents reviewed by multiple stakeholders, including legal, technical, and procurement experts |
|
Lack of capacity on bid evaluation |
Operational |
Provide comprehensive training to evaluation committee members on how to apply the criteria objectively and consistently |
|
Lack of safeguards and internal control system |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Implement standardised scoring matrices to ensure uniform assessment and minimize subjectivity
Rotation of procurement officials
Robust vetting and selection of officials
Conduct regular controls to ensure compliance |
|
Lack of public procurement technical knowledge of the members of the tender evaluation committee (e.g. non-identification of non-compliant bids) |
Lack of capacity of the members of the evaluation committee |
Operational |
Provide comprehensive training to evaluation committee members on how to apply the criteria objectively and consistently
Conduct regular training programmes on public procurement regulations, evaluation techniques, and best practices
Include technical experts and procurement specialists on the evaluation committee to provide guidance and knowledge |
|
Lack of guidelines on how to evaluate an offer |
Operational |
Provide detailed guidelines and checklists for evaluating tenders to support thorough and consistent assessments |
|
Economic operators challenging the evaluation process/the award decision |
Corruption and/or conflict of interest |
Fraud and corruption |
Develop clear, measurable award criteria as much as possible
Document all stages of the evaluation process
Promote whistle-blowing mechanisms |
|
Poor quality of tender documents |
Operational |
Use HSPPA templates and checklists to prepare tender documents
Have tender documents reviewed by multiple stakeholders, including legal, technical, and procurement experts
|
|
Subjective evaluation of tenders |
Fraud and corruption
Legal/regulatory/compliance |
Develop clear, measurable award criteria as much as possible
Document all stages of the evaluation process
Provide detailed guidelines and checklists for evaluating tenders to support thorough and consistent assessments |
|
Lack of capacity of the member of the evaluation committee |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Provide comprehensive training to evaluation committee members on how to apply the criteria objectively and consistently and how to duly justify their evaluation |
|
Lack of assurance on the absence of conflict of interest of the member of the evaluation committee |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Disclose all potential conflict of interests through formal declarations and consider disqualifying members from participation to avoid any possible biases |
|
Delays in evaluating bids |
Lack of capacity on bid evaluation |
Operational |
Conduct regular training programmes on public procurement regulations, evaluation techniques, and best practices
Provide comprehensive training to evaluation committee members on how to apply the criteria objectively and consistently
Include technical experts and procurement specialists on the evaluation committee to provide guidance and knowledge |
|
Lack of effective planning of public procurement activities |
Operational |
Preparation and publication of an annual procurement plan that includes information
such as budget, expected timeline and a brief description of the need
Include contingencies in the procurement timeline (e.g. for potential challenges) |
|
Administrative burdens and lack of capacity |
Operational |
Adequately staff and resource evaluation committees to handle the workload
Include contingencies in the procurement timeline (e.g. for potential challenges) |
|
Submission of appeals |
Operational |
Implement firm deadlines for the submission of appeals and for addressing them to prevent prolonged delays
Equip evaluation committee members with comprehensive training on appeal scenarios, ensuring faster, informed responses that minimise delays |
|
Tender cancellation at the evaluation phase |
Lack of capacity on bid evaluation |
Operational |
Conduct regular training programmes on public procurement regulations, evaluation techniques, and best practices |
|
No eligible bids submitted |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Increase market engagement activities such as information sessions, pre-tender briefings, and outreach programmes
Simplify bid requirements where possible and ensure wide publication of tender opportunities to attract more participants
Build the capacity of procurement officials on promoting competition for a specific
contract (procedures, award and selection criteria, minimum requirements, etc.) |
|
Low number of bids received |
Fiscal
Fraud and corruption |
Widely disseminate information about upcoming tenders (e.g. through Prior
Information Notices, entity's website)
Preparation and publication of an annual procurement plan that includes information
such as budget, expected timeline and a brief description of the need |
|
Administrative burdens and lack of capacity |
Operational |
Build the capacity of procurement officials on ensuring the maximal possible competition for a specific contract (procedures, award and selection criteria, minimum requirements, etc.) |
|
Cancellation of the tender after the approval of an appeal |
Legal/regulatory/compliance |
Define a clear and structured process for handling appeals, including timelines and responsibilities
Enhance communication with bidders to clarify any doubts or concerns before the tender is finalized
Develop an action plan to address the issues raised in the appeal and prevent similar problems in the future |
|
Inadequate evaluation of tenders (e.g. failure to verify documents and certificates submitted by the bidders) |
Supporting documentation not verified by contracting authority |
Fraud and corruption
Legal/regulatory/compliance |
Provide check lists to be filled in by the evaluation committee for every bid evaluation
Conduct regular audits of evaluation procedures |
|
Lack of capacity of the member of the evaluation committee |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Provide comprehensive training to evaluation committee members on how to apply the criteria objectively and consistently |
|
Lack of capacity from the contracting authority to identify potential errors |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Provide check lists to be filled in by the evaluation committee for every bid evaluation
Conduct regular training programmes on public procurement regulations, evaluation techniques, and best practices
Selection of evaluation committee members in accordance with the regulation |
|
Lack of knowledge of the legal requirements |
Operational |
Provide comprehensive training to evaluation committee members on the legal requirements on bids evaluation
Conduct regular training programmes on public procurement regulations, evaluation techniques, and best practices |
|
Corruption and/or conflict of interest |
Fraud and corruption |
Conduct regular audits
Publish summary reports of the evaluation process and outcomes to increase transparency
Promote whistle-blowing mechanisms
Provide training on ethical standards and consequences of malpractice
Development of a code of conduct
Robust vetting and selection of officials |
|
Bid scoring inconsistent with tender documents |
Fraud and corruption
Operational |
Develop clear, measurable award criteria as much as possible and establish procedures providing for detailed justification of the evaluation and scoring of criteria
Provide comprehensive training to evaluation committee members on how to apply the criteria objectively and consistently
Provide the evaluation committee with checklists, guiding their evaluation
Publish summary reports of the evaluation process and outcomes to increase transparency |
|
Lack of transparency in the evaluation process of non-competitive procedures |
Lack of safeguards and internal control system |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Thoroughly document and steps of the process and make them available for review
Publish summary reports of outcomes for public scrutiny
Carry out regular audits
Robust vetting and selection of officials |
|
Corruption and/or conflict of interest |
Fraud and corruption
Legal/regulatory/compliance |
Develop clear, measurable award criteria as much as possible and establish procedures providing for detailed justification of the evaluation and scoring of criteria
Promote whistle-blowing mechanisms
Provide training on ethical standards and consequences of malpractice
Development of a code of conduct |
|
Lack of training on integrity in public procurement |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Build the capacity of procurement officials on the identification of integrity breaches
Provide training on ethical standards and consequences of malpractice |
|
Lack of negotiations with the awarded contractor for negotiated procedures |
Corruption and/or conflict of interest |
Fraud and corruption |
Build the capacity of procurement officials on the identification of integrity breaches
Promote whistle-blowing mechanisms
Provide training on ethical standards and consequences of malpractice
Development of a code of conduct |
|
Lack of capacity on bid negotiation |
Operational |
Conduct regular training programmes on public procurement regulations, negotiation techniques, and best practices
Develop standardised negotiation frameworks and templates and consider making their use mandatory |
|
Lack of information on beneficial ownership |
Lack of capacity on bid evaluation |
Operational |
Conduct regular training programmes on public procurement regulations, evaluation techniques, and best practices
Implement compliance checks on adherence to regulations regarding beneficial ownership |
|
Manipulation of bid evaluation to the advantage of a specific economic operator |
Corruption and/or conflict of interest |
Fraud and corruption |
Disclose all potential conflict of interests through formal declarations and consider disqualifying members from participation to avoid any possible biases
Conduct regular internal and external audits to detect and prevent corrupt practices
Promote whistle-blowing mechanisms
Development of a code of conduct
Robust vetting and selection of officials
Rotation of procurement officials |
|
Lack of training on integrity in public procurement |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Build the capacity of procurement officials on the identification of integrity breaches
Provide training on ethical standards and consequences of malpractice |
|
Failure to maintain adequate records (e.g. minutes of the evaluation process, documents necessary to lodge a preliminary appeal) |
Lack of legal sanctions in case the required documents are not provided |
Fraud and corruption
Legal/regulatory/compliance |
Consider introducing sanctions for officials who do not provide to economic operators all the documents required by the law
Provide clear guidance and training on maintaining records |
|
Lack of internal record keeping system for procurement documents, including bid evaluation |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Establish an internal record keeping system for procurement documents
Provide clear guidance and training on maintaining records |
|
Minutes of the evaluation committee not uploaded on ESIDIS |
Fraud and corruption
Operational |
Consider making it clear in the law that all minutes of the evaluation committees have to be uploaded on ESIDIS and provide for sanctions for officials who do not upload evaluations on ESIDIS
Provide clear guidance and training on maintaining records, including uploading minutes of the evaluation committee on ESIDIS |
|
Corruption and/or conflict of interest |
Fraud and corruption
Legal/regulatory/compliance |
Implement audit trails to track all actions and decisions taken during the evaluation process
Provide clear guidance and training on maintaining records
Promote whistle-blowing mechanisms |
|
Financial offer is no longer viable due to legal changes (labor legislation, safety and health legislation, etc.) |
Force majeure |
Fiscal |
Consider inserting contract price adjustment clauses in case of changes in the legal framework, at least for the changes that can be foreseen (e.g. changes in the minimum wage) |
|
Delays in the public procurement procedure |
Operational |
Include clauses in the contract that allow for adjustments in case of significant legal changes |
|
Failure to verify ESPD content |
Lack of capacity on bid evaluation |
Operational |
Conduct regular training programmes on public procurement regulations, evaluation techniques, and best practices |
|
Incorrect completion of ESPD |
Legal/regulatory/compliance
Fraud and corruption |
Conduct regular training programmes on public procurement regulations, evaluation techniques, and best practices
Where possible, use automated tools to verify the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) content |
|
Risk of not enforcing exclusion criteria effectively |
Corruption and/or conflict of interest |
Fraud and corruption
Legal/regulatory/compliance |
Implement monitoring mechanisms to ensure exclusion criteria are consistently applied
Establish and follow up on corrective action plans for bidders who do not initially meet criteria
Conduct regular internal and external audits to detect and prevent corrupt practices
Promote whistle-blowing mechanisms
Development of a code of conduct |
|
Lack of capacity of the members of the evaluation committee |
Operational |
Provide comprehensive training to evaluation committee members on how to apply the criteria objectively and consistently |
|
Lack of a digital registry to record the economic operators who meet common grounds for exclusion |
Operational
Fraud and corruption |
Consider introducing an electronic registry to track economic operators who do not meet common grounds for exclusion |
|
False documentation and information submitted by bidders |
Corruption and/or conflict of interest |
Fraud and corruption |
Implement a rigorous verification process for all submitted documents and information
Impose strict penalties for submitting false information
Maintain a registry of economic operators |
|
Lack of safeguards and internal control system |
Fraud and corruption
Operational |
Conduct risk-based controls and background checks on bidders |