This paper examines how structural policies can influence a country's risk of suffering financial
turmoil. Using a panel of 184 developed and emerging economies from 1970 to 2009, the empirical
analysis examines which structural policies can affect financial stability by either shaping the financial
account structure, by reducing the risk of international financial contagion, or by directly reducing the risk
of financial crises. Differentiated capital controls are found to affect financial stability via the structure of
the financial account. Moreover, a number of structural policies including regulatory burdens on foreign
direct investment, strict product market regulation, or tax systems which favour debt over equity finance
are found to bias external financing towards debt, thereby increasing financial crisis risk. By contrast, more
stringent domestic capital adequacy requirements for banks, greater reliance of a domestic banking system
on deposits, controls on credit market inflows, and openness to foreign bank entry are found to reduce the
vulnerability to financial contagion. Finally, vulnerability to international bank balance-sheet shocks is
found to be lower in situations of abundant global liquidity, underlining the importance of adequate central
bank reactions in situations of financial turmoil.
International Capital Mobility and Financial Fragility ‑ Part 3. How Do Structural Policies Affect Financial Crisis Risk?
Evidence from Past Crises Across OECD and Emerging Economies
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper19 June 202652 Pages
-
15 June 2026110 Pages
-
12 June 202658 Pages
-
Working paper
New evidence from the OECD Product Market Regulation Indicators
1 June 202657 Pages -
Working paper
Insights from a new dataset of monthly card spending for 12 countries and 9 spending categories
18 May 202661 Pages -
1 April 202662 Pages
-
1 April 202627 Pages
Related publications
-
15 June 2026110 Pages
-
10 June 202620 Pages