The success of these measures is not exclusively linked to the provision of services or expertise on these specific aspects, but depends in an important way on the leadership of managers and owners, as they ultimately decide on change and skills strategies within the firm. Ensuring their commitment to investment in human capital is therefore a key prerequisite for making adult learning a reality in smaller firms (OECD, 2020[40]; OECD, 2019[1]).
The linkages between management practices and firm productivity has been broadly documented in the academic literature and supported by an increasing number of country specific and cross-country firm surveys. As an example, the World Management Survey, which is conducted since 2004 in more than 30 countries, shows that management practices account for around 30% of total factor productivity (TFP) in the manufacturing sector, both across and within countries (Bloom, Sadun and Van Reenen, 2016[43]). In several instances, family ownership compounds the problem: managerial quality is lower in firms which are fully managed by the owning family (Bloom, Sadun and Van Reenen, 2016[43]), and family management is negatively associated to firm performance, on average across country (Bloom and Van Reenen, 2007[44]). While good managerial practices and skilled managers are two distinct aspects of firms’ managerial capabilities, the association of good managerial practices to firm productivity is largely explained by the human capital of managers (Bender et al., 2018[45]).Improving management practices requires changes in both the supply of and the demand for managers.
Measures that aim to foster management and leadership skills are therefore important to promote investment in human capital for the competitiveness and productivity of the company. A recent OECD comparative analysis of government programmes aimed at improving managerial skills in small enterprises, mostly from traditional sectors of the economy (e.g. retail trade and low-tech manufacturing), finds that combining management training and consulting with support in ICT use is a common approach to boosting innovation in small low-tech enterprises (OECD, 2016[30]; Marchese et al., 2019[46]).
These measures all envisage a highly tailored approach: by culture (every entrepreneur feels its company is a world apart from all others) or as a consequence of the realities of production, business leaders prefer training that is highly specific to their territory, sector and ultimately company. This requires a set of training instruments that emphasises such tailored and often personalised approach: vouchers, coaching, mentoring. Moreover, good support practices follow the (digitalisation, internationalisation, or reskilling) project throughout at least part of its life. Indeed an initial assistance on the design of the project does not exclude that serious implementation difficulties can emerge along the project’s life, and make the initial support irrelevant.
Owner-managers of small firms are found to generally prefer mentoring and longer-term business development programmes with intensive training and support sessions at intervals (Stone, 2010[16]). Measures adopted across European countries indeed tend to favour mentoring, peer learning and coaching, with the aim to build general leadership and management skills, or to focus on specific aspects such as building skills linked to the digital transformation and management of change. By fostering trust between instructors and learners, and leveraging the value of peers’ experience, coaching and mentoring are especially valuable for those business leaders who do not think any intervention is needed. Successful coaching and mentoring happen in small groups (or even solely between the instructor and the business leader), and they require the active involvement of the trainee.
Providing public support to SMEs by introducing an external consultant or coach is important because firms, and especially SMEs, often lack a strategic and long-term vision and are not fully aware of their needs in terms of technology, business planning, organisation or investment in their workforce. Even if aware of their needs, SMEs more than large firms lack the financial resources to cover the cost of consultants or coaches as offered by private consulting companies. The concrete support given by the coach or a consultant to the SME has proven successful. Coaching in particular helps CEOs or owners gain a longer term vision, develop a positive attitude towards risk, engage in restructuring, and increase motivation among the staff (OECD, 2017[47]).
Evidence from existing practices suggests that coaching, mentoring and peer learning have overall a positive impact. Companies where coaching or mentoring takes place benefit from sharing and acquiring knowledge of best leadership and management practices, as well as from the creation and establishment of new networks and contacts. This type of measure seems particularly suitable for SMEs, as their sensitivity to extra costs for long-term investment, average lower margins and lower ability to raise funds increase the return to information sharing from other businesses.
Mentoring is widely employed in Ireland and the United Kingdom. SMEs in Ireland have good access to mentoring opportunities, which are offered by the main public providers of business and training support and services. Management development training and leadership development programmes are also available in Ireland through Skillnet, the business support agency of the Government of Ireland that supports businesses in their skills needs, and Enterprise Ireland (see also Box 4.1 in the next chapter).