Annex C presents the evolution of trade facilitation performance for each AMS between 2012 and 2024. The individual charts illustrate how each AMS’ performance has progressed over time across the various dimensions of the TFIs, highlighting distinct reform trajectories and pace of implementation. By visualising these long‑term trends, the Annex highlights how performance patterns differ across AMS.
Facilitating Trade in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
Insights from Recent OECD Trade Facilitation Indicators Trends
Report
Table of contents
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Annex C. Trade facilitation performance by AMS
Copy link to Annex C. Trade facilitation performance by AMSFigure A C.1. Brunei Darussalam: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.1. Brunei Darussalam: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area
Figure A C.2. Cambodia: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.2. Cambodia: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area
Figure A C.3. Indonesia: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.3. Indonesia: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area
Figure A C.4. Lao PDR: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.4. Lao PDR: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area
Figure A C.5. Malaysia: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.5. Malaysia: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area
Figure A C.6. Myanmar: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.6. Myanmar: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area
Figure A C.7. Philippines: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.7. Philippines: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area
Figure A C.8. Singapore: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.8. Singapore: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area
Figure A C.9. Thailand: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.9. Thailand: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area
Figure A C.10. Viet Nam: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑24
Copy link to Figure A C.10. Viet Nam: Evolution of trade facilitation performance by AMS, 2012‑242 = maximum performance that can be achieved by area