Despite the predominately negative evidence of the impact of local content requirements on trade, they continue to play a significant role in trade policy. This has been particularly true since the financial crisis of 2008. The work presented here provides new evidence of the detrimental effects these policies have on the imposing country’s own economy. Most empirical studies have focused on the long run inefficiencies associated with LCRs, notably in the effected sector. This paper highlights the costs to other sectors in the economy, the different impacts on intermediate versus final demand, and the declines in trade in third-party economies, despite not engaging in direct trade with the imposing country. Economies imposing LCRs experience a decrease in exports in non-LCR effected sectors and a growing concentration of domestic activity in a few targeted sectors, undermining potential growth and innovation on a broader scale. The paper concludes by offering policy alternatives.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
5 November 202662 Pages -
26 October 202648 Pages -
12 October 202647 Pages -
Working paper
Capital‑endogenised TiVA indicators
18 September 202645 Pages -
7 September 202667 Pages -
11 August 202678 Pages
-
Working paper
Insights from case studies of cobalt, lithium and nickel
18 December 202578 Pages
Related publications
-
6 November 20268 Pages
-
5 November 202662 Pages -
Policy brief
Lessons from fertilisers
19 October 20267 Pages