A Practical Guide to Investment Tax Incentives
Annex A. Key steps for improving tax incentive policymaking
Copy link to Annex A. Key steps for improving tax incentive policymakingTable A A.1. Key steps and recommended actions
Copy link to Table A A.1. Key steps and recommended actions|
Key steps |
Recommended actions |
|
|---|---|---|
|
CONCEPTION |
||
|
1. Determine the need for policy intervention |
Identify the rationale justifying government intervention and consider available policy options |
|
|
2. Assess potential costs and benefits, and define clear policy objectives |
Set ex-ante evaluation frameworks and requirements Conduct ex-ante policy assessments to compare policy alternatives and maximise value for money Consider direct and indirect effects, financing fiscal and financing implications, broader economic and development outcomes Define clear and measurable policy objectives aligned with national development goals |
|
|
3. Establish procedures and governance mechanisms |
Introduce tax incentives via primary legislation and consolidate them in the tax code Set incentive duration and plan for ex-post evaluation at the outset Anticipate potential reform challenges and risks Set procedures and institutional arrangements for tax incentive governance |
|
|
DESIGN |
||
|
1. Key considerations to improve effectiveness and efficiency of tax incentive design |
Aim to stimulate additional investment and reduce windfall gains |
|
|
Tailor design choices to policy objective and context |
||
|
Consider diverse investor response |
||
|
Minimise potential for abuse |
||
|
2. Main design elements to maximise results while limiting costs |
Instrument |
Select instrument that will best stimulate an investment response at lowest costs |
|
Targeting |
Target to policy goals and consider relevant trade-offs |
|
|
Generosity |
Consider if carryover, refundability and related provisions can support investment response |
|
|
Limits |
Limit excessive generosity and encourage review and evaluation |
|
|
IMPLEMENTATION |
||
|
1. Establish clear granting procedures, ideally based on self-assessment |
Determine authorities involved |
Empower revenue authority as administrator of tax incentives, while other agencies may support application processing and verifications |
|
Establish granting mechanisms |
Prioritise self-assessments, reduce discretion for approval-based processes, avoid granting incentives via opaque contracts or bilateral processes |
|
|
Strengthen inter-agency cooperation |
Leverage cooperation to facilitate verifications and enhance data sharing |
|
|
Enhance compliance |
Require that all applicants meet basic compliance and filing obligations |
|
|
2. Provide simple and predictable process |
Streamline administrative costs and applications |
Simplify registration and compliance processes If incentives require approval, consider using standardised applications and a one stop shop Consider using digital solutions |
|
3. Enhance transparency of investment incentives |
Provide clear, accessible and up-to-date information |
Provide comprehensive information on available incentives and requirements through guides or digital platforms that are updated regularly; consider offering additional assistance to further enhance compliance and uptake |
|
MONITORING |
||
|
1. Determine what to monitor |
Compliance |
Track compliance with tax incentive conditions, informed by a compliance risk assessment, to minimise abuse, ensure proper use of public funds and more effective policy |
|
Take-up |
Track which firms claim the tax incentive and their characteristics to understand how the policy works in practice |
|
|
Cost |
Report on itemised cost per incentive for tax expenditure reports (see Evaluation) |
|
|
Performance & potential outcomes |
Monitor performance of beneficiaries (e.g. employment, local sourcing), non-beneficiaries, and other outcomes that might be linked to the policy to provide input for evaluations |
|
|
2. Establish process |
How data is collected |
Assess if most relevant information is already collected in tax returns or other reporting, and what coverage gaps exist |
|
Data format |
Aim for sufficient disaggregation, standard data formats and digital datasets |
|
|
Who collects |
Provide tax authorities access to all relevant monitoring data, consider how other agencies (e.g. investment promotion agencies) can support monitoring |
|
|
How data secured & shared |
Ensure procedures and infrastructure in place to allow secure data sharing |
|
|
3. Build capacity |
Consider most appropriate means to expand data collection |
|
|
Explore how to draw from other data sources to fill monitoring gaps |
||
|
EVALUATION |
||
|
1. Establish aims & governance |
Set goals |
Determine aims, scope, frequency, and evaluation criteria (e.g., effectiveness, efficiency, distortions, equity, administrability, policy coherence) |
|
Establish mandate |
Require, by law, regular evaluations |
|
|
Designate agency |
Designate unit or agencies in charge of evaluation and ensure sufficient staff, technical & financial resources |
|
|
Consider partnerships (across government bodies, with international or regional organisations, development agencies, universities, peer countries) |
||
|
2. Determine most appropriate & feasible approach |
Assess & improve capacity |
Assess capacity, data needs & availability for evaluation approach |
|
Set coordination mechanisms with data-collecting agencies |
||
|
Develop plan for improving capacity, data collection, widening evaluation goals |
||
|
Select or sequence approach |
A. Build inventory of tax incentives |
|
|
B. Construct descriptive statistics on tax incentive take-up, firm characteristics, observable outcomes |
||
|
C. Estimate direct costs: revenue foregone, administrative & compliance costs |
||
|
D. Estimate benefits & additional costs: impact, spillovers, distortions |
||
|
E. Conduct cost-benefit analysis |
||
|
3. Report on findings |
Determine audience, format & frequency of reports |
|
|
Ensure findings are clear and accessible for audience |
||
|
Develop recommendations for reform |
||
|
4. Consider and prepare for reform |
Make a policy and political case for reform |
|
|
Consider including in a package of reforms to mitigate costs |
||
|
Consider best timing, potentially phased or sequenced changes |
||
|
Communicate plans to promote transparency and predictability |
||