Since the period of the latest peer review:
tax treaties with Colombia, Spain and Uzbekistan entered into force; and
tax treaties with Algeria, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Jamaica, Morocco, Peru, Serbia and Uruguay were signed (treaty with Algeria is not in force).
Making Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective – Consolidated Information on Mutual Agreement Procedures 2023
Japan
Copy link to JapanRecent developments relating to MAP in Japan prior to 15 August 2023
Developments relating to MAP in the tax treaty network
Other developments relating to MAP
No developments were reported
Latest Action 14 Peer Review report
15 April 2021 - https://doi.org/10.1787/e3d454fd-en
Tax treaty network of Japan
79 treaties, applicable to 86 jurisdictions (77 treaties of which are in force)
status of MLI: in force.
Table 1. State of play of Japan's tax treaty network
Copy link to Table 1. State of play of Japan's tax treaty network|
Treaties in line with the Action 14 Minimum Standard following MLI impact |
Treaties where actions are ongoing to make them in line with the Action 14 Minimum Standard |
Following impact/actions, remaining treaties that are not in line with Action 14 Minimum Standard |
|---|---|---|
|
69 |
0 |
10 |
Source: OECD
Japan's MAP programme
Organisation of competent authority function
46 persons:
four heads of unit
46 persons working on MAP cases (among which three persons work on other tasks as well):
all 46 persons can work on any types of MAP cases including attribution/allocation cases and other cases.
contact persons for MAP requests:
Office of Mutual Agreement Procedures (“MAP Office”), National Tax Agency (“NTA”)
Office Address: 3-1-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8978 JAPAN
Tel: +81-3-3581-5451.
Figure 1. Competent Authority Organisational Structure
Copy link to Figure 1. Competent Authority Organisational Structure
Source: OECD
Table 2. Guidance on the MAP process
Copy link to Table 2. Guidance on the MAP process|
MAP guidance |
Commissioner’s Directive on the Mutual Agreement Procedure, 14 February 2022 |
https://www.nta.go.jp/english/00.pdf (Section 6 to be referred to for form and content of a MAP request, including information requirements) |
|
Ministerial Ordinance of ATT |
https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=344AC0000000046#345 |
|
|
MAP profile |
1 August 2019 |
https://www.oecd.org/tax/dispute/japan-dispute-resolution-profile.pdf |
Overview of Japan's MAP Statistics for 2022
Please refer to https://www.oecd.org/tax/dispute/map-statistics-japan.pdf for details with respect to Japan's MAP Statistics.
Figure 2. Cases closed in 2022
Copy link to Figure 2. Cases closed in 2022
Source: OECD
Figure 3. Evolution of Japan's MAP caseload (2016-22)
Copy link to Figure 3. Evolution of Japan's MAP caseload (2016-22)
Source: OECD
Table 3. Overview of Japan’s MAP caseload for 2022
Copy link to Table 3. Overview of Japan’s MAP caseload for 2022|
Inventory for year 2022 |
Opening Inventory 1/1/2022 |
Cases started |
Cases Closed |
End Inventory 31/12/2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Attribution/allocation cases |
88 |
36 |
39 |
85 |
|
Other cases |
16 |
5 |
8 |
13 |
|
Total |
104 |
41 |
47 |
98 |
Source: OECD
Table 4. Japan’s average time to resolve MAP cases in 2022
Copy link to Table 4. Japan’s average time to resolve MAP cases in 2022|
Cases resolved in year 2022 |
Pre-2016 cases |
Post-2015 cases |
All |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
Average time |
Number of cases |
Average time |
Number of cases |
Average time |
|
|
Start to End |
||||||
|
Attribution / Allocation cases |
2 |
88.60 |
37 |
27.50 |
39 |
30.63 |
|
Other cases |
0 |
N/A |
8 |
18.44 |
8 |
18.44 |
|
All cases |
2 |
88.60 |
45 |
25.89 |
47 |
28.56 |
Source: OECD