Share

United Republic of Tanzania


  • 17-March-2021

    English

    Aid at a glance charts

    These ready-made tables and charts provide for snapshot of aid (Official Development Assistance) for all DAC Members as well as recipient countries and territories. Summary reports by regions (Africa, America, Asia, Europe, Oceania) and the world are also available.

    Related Documents
  • 26-April-2017

    English

    Social Protection in East Africa - Harnessing the Future

    This strategic foresight report assesses the interaction between demographics, economic development, climate change and social protection in six countries in East Africa between now and 2065: Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia. The report combines population projections with trends in health, urbanisation, migration and climate change and identifies the implications for economic development and poverty. It concludes by identifying policies to address seven grand challenges for social protection planners in national governments and donor agencies which emerge from the projections. These include: eliminating extreme poverty; extending social insurance in a context of high informality; the rapid growth of the working-age population, in particular the youth; adapting social protection to urban settings; protecting the poor from the effects of climate change; harnessing a demographic dividend; and substantially increasing funding for social protection.
  • 30-September-2016

    English

    Tanzania - Public Works Assessment

    A Two-week field mission to Tanzania was held to assess the effectiveness of public works programmes in 10 villages.

    Related Documents
  • 19-May-2014

    English

    African countries need to tap global markets more effectively to strengthen their economies, says new African Economic Outlook

    By participating more effectively in the global production of goods and services, Africa can transform its economy and achieve a development breakthrough, according to the latest African Economic Outlook, released at the African Development Bank Group’s Annual Meetings.

    Related Documents
  • 23-December-2013

    English

    Tanzania - OECD Investment Policy Review

    This Investment Policy Review examines Tanzania's achievements in developing an open and transparent investment regime and its efforts to reduce restrictions on international investment.

    Related Documents
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 19-March-2013

    English

    Investment policy reform in Tanzania

    The Tanzanian government, in partnership with the OECD and NEPAD, has undertaken a review of its investment policies to support its national strategy for economic reform and to improve the business climate and attract more investment in key sectors, such as infrastructure and agriculture. This page describes the review process.

    Related Documents
  • 17-May-2012

    English, , 353kb

    DFID'S Education Programme in Three East African Countries: Ethiopia, Rwanda and Tanzania

    The ICAI report says that these countries the UK has succeeded in boosting enrolment substantially but ICAI raises concerns that the quality of education being provided is so low that it detracts from the development impact.

  • 1-May-2012

    English, , 4,611kb

    Finnish support to development of local governance

    The purpose of the evaluation is to make a wider assessment of Finland’s support in local governance and decentralisation in Kenya, Namibia, South Africa and Tanzania.

  • 13-March-2012

    English, , 768kb

    Country Programmes between Finland and Nepal, Nicaragua and Tanzania

    This evaluation of the Finnish country programmes with Nepal, Nicaragua and Tanzania over the past decade and focused on how anti-poverty development policies and the agents of policy implementation interacted, and influenced each country programme.

  • 21-February-2012

    English, , 3,748kb

    Country Programme between Finland and Tanzania

    National capacity constraints and weakening dialogue with government encouraged donors, including Finland, to revert to the increased use of projects after 2007. Some of these lacked grounding in policy, were not plausibly linked to poverty, and were founded on inadequate dialogue and analysis.

  • 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 > >>