The paper develops the view that the perspective on the HIPC initiative is distorted by the fact that -contrary to the Brady deal itself- it lacks all perspective on the “market value” of the debt which is written down. The appropriate “market value” is one that takes account of the risk of non-payment: arrears, rescheduling and “constrained” refinancing of various sorts. Building upon econometric evidence that relies on middle income debtors in the eighties, the paper argues that the initiative is about ten times less generous than face value accounting would suggest ...
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
Evidence on data availability and quality in 18 countries
28 May 202640 Pages -
13 November 202556 Pages
-
Working paper
Reinforcing global food markets
1 August 202549 Pages -
27 June 202536 Pages
-
Working paper
Methodology and the example of the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake
27 June 202537 Pages -
27 June 202536 Pages
-
24 April 202554 Pages
-
Working paper
Historical perspectives from the 1850s‑1930s
17 April 202550 Pages
Related publications
-
18 June 2026164 Pages -
Policy paper18 June 202647 Pages
-
Policy paper18 June 202655 Pages
-
18 June 202656 Pages
-
Policy paper18 June 202647 Pages
-
Policy paper18 June 202648 Pages