This paper provides empirical analysis that measures the cyclical properties of intergovernmental transfers (or grants). Modelling a fiscal policy reaction function this paper tests whether the transfers systems in OECD countries are pro- or counter-cyclical, i.e. whether they offset cyclical fluctuations of sub-central economies or, on the contrary, exacerbate them. Regression results suggest that transfer systems tend to be pro-cyclical in general and in more than half of OECD countries they tend to destabilise sub-central budgets. Transfer pro-cyclicality may be the result of several factors: Transfer spending is often determined as a share of central government tax revenue, which itself tends to fluctuate with the cycle. Moreover, many grants are matching sub-central spending and hence tend to exacerbate fluctuations of that sub-central spending. Pro-cyclical grants could partly explain the often observed pro-cyclicality of subcentral government fiscal policy.
Fiscal Consolidation Across Government Levels ‑ Part 3. Intergovernmental Grants, Pro‑ or Counter‑cyclical?
Working paper
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper
The macroeconomic cost of climate change
4 September 202689 Pages -
17 July 202645 Pages
-
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
Working paper
Calibrating stochastic debt sustainability analysis models
15 July 202640 Pages -
30 June 202667 Pages
-
Working paper19 June 202652 Pages
Related publications
-
17 July 202645 Pages
-
Working paper
Evidence from Costa Rica’s electronics sector
17 July 202635 Pages -
Working paper
Calibrating stochastic debt sustainability analysis models
15 July 202640 Pages