Regulatory oversight is a crucial ingredient of effective regulatory frameworks. Institutional setups and governance arrangements for regulatory oversight differ substantially across OECD countries. Beyond actors traditionally charged with oversight functions at the centre of government, the past 20 years have seen a surge in bodies located at arm’s length from the executive. This publication documents this trend by presenting case studies of the seven members of RegWatchEurope from the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, as well as of the European Union Regulatory Scrutiny Board. It aims to describe and compare their common features and differences, as well as draw some lessons from their establishment and their experience. This report feeds into work of the OECD Regulatory Policy Committee on regulatory oversight, including a dedicated chapter of the OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2018 on the institutional setup for regulatory policy as well as ongoing discussions on the mechanics and critical conditions for effective regulatory oversight.
Case Studies of RegWatchEurope regulatory oversight bodies and of the European Union Regulatory Scrutiny Board
Report
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
Related publications
-
Working paper
Lessons from the financial services sector
29 June 202663 Pages -
30 January 202672 Pages
-
Policy brief
How to manage risks while supporting growth
17 November 20258 Pages -
Report
A methodology for assessing the economic, social and environmental impacts of regulation
15 October 202563 Pages