preferential tax regimes
The assessments of preferential tax regimes are conducted by the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices (FHTP), comprising over 140 member jurisdictions of the Inclusive Framework. Since the start of the BEPS Project, the FHTP has reviewed a total of 319 preferential tax regimes. The latest assessment by the FHTP (during its November 2022 meeting) has yielded new conclusions on 13 regimes.
SUBSTANTIAL ACTIVITIES IN NO OR ONLY NOMINAL TAX JURISDICTIONS
The FHTP standard on substantial activities in no or only nominal tax jurisdictions, published in November 2018, seeks to ensure that mobile business income cannot be parked in a no or only nominal tax jurisdiction without the core business functions having been undertaken by the same business entity, or in the same location.
In doing so, the Inclusive Framework will ensure that substantial activities must be performed in respect of the same types of mobile business activities, regardless of whether they take place in a preferential regime or in a no or only nominal tax jurisdiction.
News
FURTHER INFORMATION
The Action 5 minimum standard consists of two parts. One part relates to preferential tax regimes, where a peer review is undertaken to identify features of such regimes that can facilitate base erosion and profit shifting, and therefore have the potential to unfairly impact the tax base of other jurisdictions. The second part includes a commitment to transparency through the compulsory spontaneous exchange of relevant information on taxpayer-specific rulings which, in the absence of such information exchange, could give rise to BEPS concerns.