Comparing Nuclear Accident Risks with Those from Other Energy Sources
Nuclear accident risks are raised frequently in discussions of the acceptability of
nuclear power generation, often framed in the context of the Three Mile Island and
Chernobyl accidents. In reality, the safety record of nuclear power plants, by comparison
with other electricity generation sources, is very good. This report describes how
safety has been enhanced in nuclear power plants over the years, as the designs have
progressed from Generation I to Generation III, and why it is important that safety
remain the highest priority. This is illustrated by considering core damage frequencies
and large radioactive release frequencies for each generation of nuclear power plants.
It also compares severe accident data (those resulting in five or more fatalities)
between different energy sources, both for immediate fatalities and for delayed (latent)
fatalities, recognising that the latter data are often more difficult to estimate.
Finally, it uses results of opinion surveys to analyse public confidence in nuclear
operations and how this is correlated with trust in legislation and regulatory systems.
It has been written for a general audience.
Published on August 31, 2010Also available in: French
In series:Nuclear Developmentview more titles