17-March-2021
English
These ready-made tables and charts provide for snapshot of aid (Official Development Assistance) for all DAC Members as well as recipient countries and territories. Summary reports by regions (Africa, America, Asia, Europe, Oceania) and the world are also available.
22-mai-2017
Français
Ahmedabad, Inde, 22 mai 2017 – Les gouvernements africains doivent s’appuyer davantage sur les entrepreneurs du continent pour industrialiser leurs économies, d’après les Perspectives économiques en Afrique 2017.
26-April-2017
English
30-September-2016
English
A Two-week field mission to Tanzania was held to assess the effectiveness of public works programmes in 10 villages.
23-December-2013
English
This Investment Policy Review examines Tanzania's achievements in developing an open and transparent investment regime and its efforts to reduce restrictions on international investment.
19-March-2013
English
The Tanzanian government, in partnership with the OECD and NEPAD, has undertaken a review of its investment policies to support its national strategy for economic reform and to improve the business climate and attract more investment in key sectors, such as infrastructure and agriculture. This page describes the review process.
17-May-2012
English, , 353kb
The ICAI report says that these countries the UK has succeeded in boosting enrolment substantially but ICAI raises concerns that the quality of education being provided is so low that it detracts from the development impact.
1-May-2012
English, , 4,611kb
The purpose of the evaluation is to make a wider assessment of Finland’s support in local governance and decentralisation in Kenya, Namibia, South Africa and Tanzania.
13-March-2012
English, , 768kb
This evaluation of the Finnish country programmes with Nepal, Nicaragua and Tanzania over the past decade and focused on how anti-poverty development policies and the agents of policy implementation interacted, and influenced each country programme.
21-February-2012
English, , 3,748kb
National capacity constraints and weakening dialogue with government encouraged donors, including Finland, to revert to the increased use of projects after 2007. Some of these lacked grounding in policy, were not plausibly linked to poverty, and were founded on inadequate dialogue and analysis.