This paper addresses the often neglected question of how macroeconomic risk is shared across and
within economies, and identifies reforms that could contribute towards achieving more desirable risksharing
outcomes. For risk-sharing across countries, the paper discusses possibilities for international
insurance as well as shock-spreading and risk-mitigating policies. Within countries, it assesses the
possibilities for individuals to protect their wealth, labour and capital income against various forms of
macroeconomic risk and discusses the desirable boundaries between private and government-sponsored
risk-sharing institutions. The paper then presents new empirical and model-based evidence about how the
short-term impact of selected macroeconomic shocks (including financial crises) is shared across different
groups of agents, and analyses how such distributional effects are shaped by differences in institutions. For
example, individuals on low incomes, and especially young people, seem in general to lose most from
adverse macroeconomic shocks. Also, it appears that across countries two broad types of institutions can
be identified that facilitate risk sharing between high and low income earners, namely “social protection”
and “reallocation-facilitating” institutions. Based on countries’ reliance on these types of institutions, four
broad “models” of risk sharing are identified across the OECD and the BRIICS.
The Sharing of Macroeconomic Risk
Who Loses (and Gains) from Macroeconomic Shocks
Working paper
OECD Economics Department Working Papers

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
Working paper18 December 2024
-
Working paper12 December 2024
-
3 December 2024
Related publications
-
Working paper18 December 2024
-
Working paper12 December 2024