The DAC Network on Development Evaluation promotes joint and collaborative evaluations (involving multiple development partners) as a tool for mutual accountability and learning. To facilitate collaboration, members of the Network share their evaluation plans. Visualise the inventory of evaluation plans here.
The Network has served as the coordinating hub for major international joint evaluations, such as the multi-partner evaluation of general budget support and the recently completed evaluation of the Paris Declaration. Network meetings provide an opportunity to share ideas and learn from one another's experiences with joint and country-led evaluation.
The Network is currently exploring options for conducting a joint evaluation on COVID-19. Given the urgency of support that will be required within DAC member countries and partner countries and the scale at which it is likely to be deployed, support for effective evaluation is more important than ever.
EvalNet facilitates collaboration as a means of encouraging both better co-ordinated and higher quality evaluation. A wide range of collaborative approaches have been used in the past, and can be useful complements to individual evaluations. Several options are outlined below, arranged roughly in order of increasing intensity.
Managing Joint Evaluations
What is joint evaluation?
And, what are the potential benefits and challenges?
This factsheet answers these questions and more.
Joint evaluations have the potential to bring many benefits to stakeholders
Short history of the Network’s work on joint evaluations:
In 2012, the Network organised a Workshop on Lessons Learned from Joint Evaluations in order to summarise the experiences from primarily the Paris Declaration Evaluation, but also from other large, recently undertaken, joint evaluations. The workshop was co-hosted by the Paris Declaration Evaluation Secretariat and the French Ministry of Finance.
SADEV, on behalf of the Network, undertook a study on the "Challenges, opportunities and approaches for increasing joint donor programming of evaluations in 2008. This study highlights how working together can be beneficial and explores some of the reasons why progress has been difficult. In addition, it provides concrete recommendations to help members move towards a more collaborative approach to evaluation. The Network adopted these recommendations and is now monitoring progress on several indicators. The goal of this monitoring exercise is to support the ongoing efforts of donor agencies to better involve of partner countries in evaluation processes and move towards more harmonised approaches to planning and conducting evaluations.
In 2006, the Network published the DAC Guidance for managing joint evaluations (Orientations relatives à la gestion des évaluations conjointes). This booklet is directed at the wider evaluation community and provides practical advice and tips for those involved in planning and implementing joint evaluations. This guide is based on both the earlier publications mentioned above.
In 2004, the Network commissioned a consultant to undertake a study on joint evaluations. The report, Joint Evaluations: Recent experiences, lessons learned and options for the future (26 July 2005) was presented in June 2005. It focused on recent experiences, new and evolving issues and the partner country perspective. A consultative workshop with developing country partners was also held in Nairobi (Workshop Report - Workshop on Joint Evaluations Challenging the Conventional Wisdom - the View from Developing Country Partners, Nairobi, 20-21 April 2005).
In 2003, the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry, in collaboration with the DAC Evaluation Network, hosted a major workshop on Partners in Development Evaluation - Learning and accountability, which brought together evaluation experts from 43 countries to discuss topics of common concern on evaluating aid activities.
In 2000, experiences and a first set of lessons learned about joint evaluations were synthesised and published in the DAC Evaluation and Aid Effectiveness Series: "Effective Practices in Conducting a Joint Multi-Donor Evaluation".