Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Kenya 2016

Phase 2: Implementation of the Standard in Practice

In series:Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes: Peer Reviewsview more titles

Published on March 14, 2016

This report contains the 2014 “Phase 2: Implementation of the Standards in Practice” Global Forum review of Kenya.The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of information is carried out by over 130 jurisdictions which participate in the work of the Global Forum on an equal footing.The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation of the standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. These standards are primarily reflected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commentary as updated in 2004, which has been incorporated in the UN Model Tax Convention.The standards provide for international exchange on request of foreseeably relevant information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting party. “Fishing expeditions” are not authorised, but all foreseeably relevant information must be provided, including bank information and information held by fiduciaries, regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard.All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identified by the Global Forum as relevant to its work, are being reviewed. This process is undertaken in two phases. Phase 1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction’s legal and regulatory framework for the exchange of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of that framework. Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase 1 plus Phase 2 – reviews. The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes.

Key findings

Kenya’s Phase 2 review demonstrates their continued commitment to the international standard for transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes with an overall rating of “Largely Compliant”. Generally, Kenya’s legal and regulatory framework ensures that ownership, accounting and banking information is available. However Kenya should ensure that full ownerships information is also available in the cases of trusts and nominees. These obligations are monitored by the KRA and the regulators who have a comprehensive system of oversight in place. However, due to a lack of oversight by the Registrars over the review period this may not cover the monitoring of the legal requirements by all entities. Kenya has sufficient access powers under the Income Tax Act and the right balance has been struck between rights and safeguards and accessing information. Having recently joined the Multilateral Convention, Kenya’s network of information exchange mechanisms covers 90 jurisdictions including all relevant partners. Due to issues with its postal service and organisational issues in the handling of the EOI process, out of six requests, Kenya only successfully received one EOI request over the review period. Although Kenya provided the requested information, there were long delays in its provision and status updates were not provided. Therefore, Kenya is recommended to monitor the implementation of its organisational process for EOI and to provide status updates where required. For further information on Kenya’s exchange of information practices and to read the full report click here.