OECD Home › Trade and Agriculture Directorate › Benefits of trade liberalisation › Regional Trade Agreements
|
|
Regional trade agreements (RTAs) cover more than half of international trade and operate alongside global multilateral agreements under the World Trade Organization (WTO). The first eleven years (1995-2005) of the WTO were paralleled by a tripling of RTAs officially notified to the WTO and in force, from 58 to 188*. |
They can be attractive, for example, because it may be easier for a small group of neighbouring countries with similar concerns and cultures to agree on market opening in a particular area than to reach agreement in a wider forum such as the WTO. They can also offer new approaches to rule-making and so act as stepping stones on the way to a multilateral agreement.
But regional agreements also risk making it harder for countries outside the region to trade with those inside and may discourage further opening up of markets, ultimately limiting growth prospects for all. Moreover, broad-based multilateral negotiations, with more players and more sectors, will offer greater potential for mutual gain than limited bilateral or regional deals.
|
Focus on:
|
Two broad policy lessons can be drawn from OECD work on regional trade agreements.
The first lesson is that many consequences of regional trade agreements activity bolster the case for a strengthened multilateral framework. This applies particularly to the contribution of regionalism to divergence from the rules of the multilateral system, to the effects which the patchwork of regionalism can have on non-members of those agreements and to the role of regionalism in raising transaction costs for business.
These elements are compounded by the fact that regionalism has often failed to crack the hardest nuts. In some particularly sensitive areas, regional initiatives have been no more successful – and in some cases less successful – than activity at the multilateral level. It needs to be acknowledged, however, that even were multilateral disciplines to be strengthened, RTAs, and the provisions embodied in them, would not disappear. The question then arising is how regional arrangements might impinge upon, or co-exist with, any multilateral disciplines.
The second lesson we can draw from experience with regionalism is that while some consequences of RTA activity contribute to the case of strengthening the multilateral framework, there are features of regional approaches that may nevertheless complement such strengthening or even be drawn upon in designing strengthened multilateral rules.
The scope for complementarity arises from the contribution which regional initiatives can make towards harmonisation of rule making; the scope for drawing upon arises from the extent to which RTAs go beyond the WTO. Together, these two elements have yielded highly effective synergies between approaches at the regional and the multilateral levels.
* These figures include RTAs notified under the Article XXIV of the GATT 1994 covering goods (including agriculture), the Enabling Clause covering RTAs between developing and least developed economies, but not those notified under GATS Article V regarding services.
Latest OECD papers on regional trade agreements
Multilateralising Regionalism on Government Procurement
The potential multilateralisation of government procurement commitments in regional trade agreements (RTAs) presents many issues and challenges. To what extent do RTAs go beyond the 2012 revised Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), and how do they differ among trading partners? This report surveys 47 RTAs in force with government procurement provisions where an OECD member is a party. (OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 151)
Further reading
Bookmark this page: www.oecd.org/trade/rta
Follow us
E-mail Alerts Blogs