Building a Network of Livestock Organisations

 

Interview with Dr. Ibrahima Aliou, Secretary-General,

Association for the Promotion of the Livestock in the Sahel and the Savanna

Created in 1989, APESS' activities cover today 12 African countries involving about 15000 members. Its mission is to support livestock activities and traditional livestock breeders to encourage a change in mentalities and practices. APESS operates through three Regional Information and Training Centres (CRIFA) based in Dori (Burkina Faso), Thiès (Senegal) and Garoua (Cameroon). > learn more

 

How would you assess your action? What has been achieved within the livestock sector?

APESS contributed to improve the image of the livestock sector and helped livestock breeders to get better organised and recognised. By putting our advice into practice, they were able to increase their profits (> APESS assessment of 2007 activities). Progress can still be made in the area of animal selection. Improving security conditions and the internal organisation of livestock/living areas also remain challenges. However, the APESS assessment illustrates that the behavior and mentalities of APESS members have positively evolved. Three priorities were identified:

  • The livestock sector is evolving. APESS needs to continue to support livestock breeders by providing advice and knowledge in order to avoid that they feel overwhelmed by these changes. They can play an active role and master these changes if they understand their impact, and if they are willing to persevere with the introduction of innovations which will grant them some independence from others. 
  • Livestock breeders need to have a strong, independent and sustainable organisation to support their hopes and make their voices heard. The role and responsibilities within APESS need to be redefined.
  • The future of the livestock sector depends on future generations: the youth, its education and the role  and responsibilities we give them within our families and organisations need to be one of our priorities.

From the producers’ point of view, what threats must the livestock sector face? What are the future and present challenges and opportunities?

The threats perceived by livestock breeders are the following:

  • Insecurity related to land issues: non-respect of legal texts concerning the free movement of animals leading to legal and various illegal taxes; insecurity related to gang-related crime and violence in rural areas, in particular in Chad, Cameroon and the Central African Republic.
  • Reduction and rarefaction of natural resources related to the advancing of agricultural exploitation, the impact of climate change and accelerated demographic growth increasing pressure on natural resources.
  • The lack of organisation among livestock breeders also limits the search for effective solutions to their problems today.

APESS is concerned by the lack of professional conscience of government representations in charge of livestock issues who thus do not always take appropriate measures for coherent and efficient actions.

In the framework of the 2007 assessment, five major challenges were identified:

  • Technical challenge: to master the “livestock for life” approach in order to maximise benefits;
  • Economic challenge: to manage and develop the livestock economy around milk production;
  • Spatial challenge: to secure livestock breeders’ living and working areas;
  • Socio-cultural challenge: to increase the socio-political influence of livestock breeders;
  • Geo-strategic challenge: to raise awareness and building competences to deal with globalisation

Indeed, livestock breeders cannot meet these challenges individually; which is why APESS’ mission is so important. The livestock professionals’ strength will depend on their capacity to become mobilised within one powerful livestock movement.

 

The deep-seated changes of traditional pastoral systems require the ability to significantly adapt: demographic growth contributes to intensifying demand and exerts pressure on production capacities; however, unfair competition from imported meat (dumping) hinders local production’s competitiveness. What is your strategy in order to face this competition? How should livestock sector adapt to this context?

First of all, there cannot be an isolated, individual strategy at the organisational level. Livestock professionals’ organisations must unite in order to pull together their efforts around one common strategy. The building of a network is thus essential. We believe that supporting actions led by ROPPA and ACDID is a good strategy that needs to be further explored. Why not join the ROPPA to support its livestock platform? Instead of building just another network, we could add value and strengthen ROPPA’s and ACDIC’s strategy aiming to defend livestock breeders’ interests. This strategy needs to be supported and linked to development partners in the North by the Media and food security agencies such as SOS-Faim, one of our partners. Its mission is to raise awareness in European decision-making spheres.

The reaction of livestock breeders is mixed. Everybody acknowledges and faces difficulties related to the selling of their products, but at the same time, they do not develop a clear and concise strategy to address these difficulties. It is the livestock professionals organisations’ responsibility to raise awareness and explain the dangers related to this competition as well as to elaborate an appropriate response strategy. One must also acknowledge that regional institutions such as ECOWAS and UEMOA have also raised this issue. In Niger, for instance, the construction of a slaughterhouse is planned in order to add value to the production of goods at the local level.

 

The livestock sector is at the centre of Sahelian economies; its importance is however not reflected in the budgets dedicated to this sector. According to your sources, in Burkina Faso, barely 1% of the budget is allocated to the livestock sector; Senegal allocates more with 10% of its budget. How do you explain this difference? What are you planning to do in order to advocate promoting livestock within the states?


The 1% figure in Burkina Faso is an average of the past 20 years. Today, the percentage is higher, though it remains relatively weak. The situation is quite paradox: while the livestock sector contributes significantly to the national economy, its GDP, and employs a large number of citizens, public investment in this sector is very weak. From our point of view, the following factors explain this situation:

  • Those who are in charge of livestock issues do not necessarily have the livestock professionals’ “conscience”; they wrongly consider that livestock breeders only have to organise themselves in order to tackle their problems on their own.
  • Livestock breeders are indeed not sufficiently organised to express their demands; in countries which have a tradition of labour unions, such as Senegal, livestock concerns are taken into account much better than in those where this organisational culture is quite new (Burkina Faso); moreover, the lack of school enrolment which is particularly strong within the livestock community, does not always allow them to become represented in programming and decision-making institutions.
  • Livestock breeders seldom vote and are mostly absent in local electoral lists. Consequently, they have very few representatives who could help them make their voice heard by decision-makers.

We have regular contact with state representatives, in particular with the Ministries in charge of animal resources of Burkina Faso and Niger. In the framework of preparatory work for the Regional Livestock Forum, we have been received by the two Ministers. They strongly supported our position and the whole group of organisations which were involved in this process (APESS, Bilital Maroobé, Association pour la Redynamisation de l’Élevage au Niger (AREN), Pastoral Resolve (PARE Nigeria), National Commission for Nomadic Education (Nigeria - NCNE), Maison des éleveurs, Fédération des éleveurs de l’Adamaoua (Cameroun –FEPELAD),  etc.)

Lobbying towards states must focus on raising awareness. Our organisations which are in direct contact with local actors have good knowledge of their problems and can thus become their voice. However, beyond this, governments need to have clear and well-developed proposals which they can give leverage to and defend. These proposals are often missing. To ensure that their concerns, needs and ambitions are taken into account, livestock professionals and their organisations need to build a strong group in order to directly lobby decision-makers.

 

The last APESS General Assembly in 2008 focused on the role of women. Why did you choose this topic?

Women are responsible for all activities related to the milk production cycle, from milking to selling. More than 50% of the livestock economy is managed by women. Women are also increasingly involved in the rearing of animals for selling purposes. Both activities are becoming popular in families where hay stocking is used to improve performance during the dry season. To simplify: men guard the herds - women maintain and raise them for market.

APESS focuses its work on women because a trained/educated woman becomes a driving force for the whole family. This is why APESS designed specific training for women, focusing on the change of mentalities and improved management. APESS also works in partnership with other programmes and organisations such as the Garoua Centre, to initiative women into revenue generating activities.

The topic of our last General Assembly (“Women, Culture and Knowledge”) was selected to raise our collective awareness (men and women) on the fundamental role that is played by women in our society, in particular within the traditional livestock culture; it underlines the importance of women and encourages them to play their role entirely, which is beneficial for the family and the whole community. This choice was a success. Many prejudices were addressed and modified.

You have also highlighted the complicity/relationship between livestock breeders and their animals by describing their relationship in terms of a contract: “Livestock breeding is a changing and evolving process by which both the livestock breeder and the animal benefit through their exchanges of courtesies and products. While we raise them in every way, in turn they raise us in every way. Livestock breeding is thus an exchange contract between animal and livestock breeder and each must respect their terms of the contract.” Is this rationale compatible with maximising profits? Does spirituality play an important role in this profession?


Obviously this concept is not compatible with an approach aimed at maximizing profit only. Besides, we should maybe question this capitalist concept since it has repeatedly led to crises such as the mad cow disease, bird flu and the current global economic crisis. One can also observe a trend reversal to “all-bio” in Europe. This means recognizing that the animal is not just a “production machine”. The animal has a life that it shares with the one who keeps and raises it. If both agree, they will raise themselves mutually. This logic does not exclude that the livestock breeder will optimize profit; though the profit is not the main objective but the natural result of his/her efforts. This is very important and here is where spirituality comes in. Spirituality plays an important role as it puts the profit into perspective and transcends it for the benefit of the animal that, in the case of production, needs to give its consent.

 

Nigeria is by far the largest producer of animals and their by-products. In the Sahel, Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger and Senegal are the main producer countries. Do you regularly have an exchange with and share your experiences with producer associations in neighbouring countries? Is a network of these associations being set up? Is there competition between you?


We need to recognize that the exchange of experiences with neighbouring organisations has up until now not been very present within APESS. Apart of inviting a few external associations to our annual General Assembly, APESS has not done much to reach out to other livestock organisations. However, we plan to improve this as no organisation or association, however powerful it may be, can be self-sufficient or pretend to know all the solutions. Exchanging experiences and pulling together a large diversity of competences will allow us to better address the problems that the livestock sector is facing. The intense preparatory work in which we participated within the framework of the Regional Livestock Forum proves the effectiveness of this approach. These consultations maximised the impact of our participation in this Forum where the concerns of our members, and APESS in general, were taken into consideration. Building an information-sharing network is an idea that is shared by all organisations. We have not yet started discussions but this initiative needs to be taken by one or several institutions. We will soon start working on this. Competition between “serious” organisations cannot reasonably exist as we share the same objective: giving livestock breeders and the livestock sector the leverage, resources and recognition they merit. There is no competition, only complementarity.

 

In the guidelines from the Regional Livestock Forum, ECOWAS Ministers recommended “building capacities of national and regional professional organisations through the setting up of a network”. What concrete actions could be carried out to facilitate this work? What do you plan to do? What do you expect from national policies and ECOWAS?

First of all, livestock professionals’ organisations, in particular those which participated in the Niamey Forum, will need to work on a shared proposal on how to put these different recommendations into practice. On this basis, it will be necessary to take stock of existing initiatives: what are the actions already undertaken by States and their sub-regional/intercontinental organisations? We also need to establish a dialogue with public authorities and regional institutions (ECOWAS, UEMOA, CILSS) to explore possibilities for the implementation of these recommendations. In any case, we will remain vigilant. We will make sure that these recommendations will be translated into measures in the framework of the action plan that ECOWAS is in charge to develop.

 

>> About APESS

Creation:    

1989 

Members:

about 15000 

Countries covered:

Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Central African Republic, Gambia (the), Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mali,  Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria and Senegal

Structures:

 

A General-Secretariat provisionally located in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso); three Regional Information and Training Centres (CRIFA) in Dori (Burkina Faso), Thiès (Senegal) and Garoua (Cameroon).

Mission:

 

 “support livestock activities and traditional livestock breeders to encourage a change in mentalities and practices

Activities:

 

  • Training involving all dimensions of human development : spiritual, intellectual, emotional and technical;
  • Organisational support, basic education for adults and school enrolment of children;
  • Support to improve animal feeding during the dry season (fodder and foreaging troughs, capacity to stock hay, improvement of fodder management, grants for fodder grains, etc.)
  • Raising awareness on new challenges; increasing their political involvement in order to become stakeholders in the decision-making process.

Benificiaries:

 

Traditional livestock breeders for which livestock activities is above all a life style and not just an economic activity;

Budget:

 

940 000 € (annual), shared between the three regional Centres; sources:

  • ~ 85 % by development partners : 60% by the Swiss Development Co-operation (SDC); 20% by SOS-Faim
  • ~ 10 % contributions by members
  • ~ 5 % services to third-parties.

 


 

 

Related Documents

 

SWAC News- February 2009

 

Countries list

  • Afghanistan
  • Albania
  • Algeria
  • Andorra
  • Angola
  • Anguilla
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Aruba
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Bangladesh
  • Barbados
  • Belarus
  • Belgium
  • Belize
  • Benin
  • Bermuda
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Bulgaria
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burundi
  • Cambodia
  • Cameroon
  • Canada
  • Cape Verde
  • Cayman Islands
  • Central African Republic
  • Chad
  • Chile
  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Chinese Taipei
  • Colombia
  • Comoros
  • Congo
  • Cook Islands
  • Costa Rica
  • Croatia
  • Cuba
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Denmark
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
  • Estonia
  • Ethiopia
  • European Union
  • Faeroe Islands
  • Fiji
  • Finland
  • Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)
  • France
  • French Guiana
  • Gabon
  • Gambia
  • Georgia
  • Germany
  • Ghana
  • Gibraltar
  • Greece
  • Greenland
  • Grenada
  • Guatemala
  • Guernsey
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Guyana
  • Haiti
  • Honduras
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iraq
  • Ireland
  • Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Isle of Man
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Jamaica
  • Japan
  • Jersey
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kiribati
  • Korea
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Latvia
  • Lebanon
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Libya
  • Liechtenstein
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Macao (China)
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Malaysia
  • Maldives
  • Mali
  • Malta
  • Marshall Islands
  • Mauritania
  • Mauritius
  • Mayotte
  • Mexico
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • Moldova
  • Monaco
  • Mongolia
  • Montenegro
  • Montserrat
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
  • Nauru
  • Nepal
  • Netherlands
  • Netherlands Antilles
  • New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Niue
  • Norway
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Palau
  • Palestinian Administered Areas
  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Philippines
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Puerto Rico
  • Qatar
  • Romania
  • Russian Federation
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Helena
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Samoa
  • San Marino
  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Senegal
  • Serbia
  • Serbia and Montenegro (pre-June 2006)
  • Seychelles
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Slovak Republic
  • Slovenia
  • Solomon Islands
  • Somalia
  • South Africa
  • South Sudan
  • Spain
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Swaziland
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • Tajikistan
  • Tanzania
  • Thailand
  • Timor-Leste
  • Togo
  • Tokelau
  • Tonga
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Tuvalu
  • Uganda
  • Ukraine
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • United States Virgin Islands
  • Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vanuatu
  • Venezuela
  • Vietnam
  • Virgin Islands (UK)
  • Wallis and Futuna Islands
  • Western Sahara
  • Yemen
  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe
  • Topics list