Better Regulation in Europe: Luxembourg

 

          Luxembourg                                                                                            

Contents | Executive summary  | How to obtain this publication | More information 

Better Regulation in Europe: Luxembourg

The EU 15 Better Regulation project is a partnership between the OECD and the European Commission. It draws on the initiatives for Better Regulation promoted by both organisations over the last few years.

 

The OECD report, including recommendations on Better Regulation in Luxembourg is available by clicking on each chapter heading below.

 

The Executive summary (pdf format) contains the OECD assessment and recommendations.

Conclusions

Chapter 1: Strategy and policies for Better Regulation
  • Consider ways of giving policy for Better Regulation a permanent status.
  • Ensure a balance between programmes for businesses and citizens in future development of the Better Regulation programme.
  • Take steps to promote ex ante impact assessments, public consultation, and effective transposition of EU directives, as well as a policy for central/municipal regulatory management.
  • Adopt a communication strategy in the full sense of the term, shared between key institutions at the core of government, and designed to explain the strong link between effective regulation, a sound and competitive economy, and a government that can deliver public services more effectively. Identify the opportunities and the vehicles (e.g. annual reports) for doing this. Consider expanding the CSA annual report and give it greater visibility.
  • Adopt a clear policy for evaluating the different aspects of regulation based on clearly defined objectives and a strict timetable, in light of available resources. Give thought to who should conduct these evaluations.
Chapter 2: Institutional capacities for Better Regulation
  • Confirm the CSA’s lead role in regulatory policy, while clarifying the role of its close associates, in particular the Central Legislation Service (SCL). Review the makeup of the plenary to provide for broader representation by civil society stakeholders.
  • Continue with the structures in place for ensuring inter-ministerial co ordination. Ensure that the representatives in those structures are officials with sufficient rank to reinforce messages with their colleagues. Consider appointing a minister and/or a senior official within each ministry to ensure visibility and political support for those messages.
  • Review the arrangements whereby the executive branch and parliament can share the information needed to maintain parliamentary interest in Better Regulation.
  • Prepare a policy that ensures the availability of resources and training needed to support implementation of the various tools for Better Regulation, including legal drafting and impact assessments.
Chapter 3: Transparency through consultation and communication
  • Develop use of the Internet in a (initially) targeted and specific manner for certain consultations so as to take better account of public views, and to gain “in the field” experience, following the examples of other countries such as Portugal and Finland. Establish an electronic portal for these consultations.
  • Establish guidelines for consultation. Share experiences among ministries to identify best practices and the most useful processes.
Chapter 4: The development of new regulations
  • Strengthen upstream co-operation among ministries. Publish the government programme and any changes to it, in particular drafts of laws (and of important regulations) to give them greater visibility and allow stakeholders the chance to make their opinions known. Examine the potential of electronic systems for more effective data sharing between ministries and with parliament.
  • Review the legal control process to have it start as soon as possible in the procedure. Review the structures and capabilities for quality control, by establishing a panel of jurists within government (following the United Kingdom’s example) or a strengthened partnership with CSA or SCL in the early stages of the process of developing regulations, and boost their resources.
  • Establish a timeframe for the Council of State to issue its opinions.
  • Review and strengthen institutional arrangements for producing high quality impact assessments.
  • Review training courses for possible improvements, and ensure that they are part of compulsory training and are taken by the largest possible number of civil servants. Incorporate these into the revision of the general manual.
  • Evaluate the impact assessment mechanism regularly, and publish the evaluations. These could be included in the CSA’s published reports on progress with simplification.
Chapter 5: The management and rationalisation of existing regulations
  • Confirm the importance attached to legislative simplification, as part of the effort to make laws more accessible.
  • Strengthen institutional support for legislative simplification. Establish and publish precise quantified objectives for the ministries concerned in the administrative burden reduction programme.
  • Confirm the intention to move forward with the programme to reduce red tape for citizens as soon as resources are available and the responsible body has been identified.
  • Consider the possibility of a red tape programme for the government itself.

Chapter 6: Compliance, enforcement, appeals
  • Review the regulatory enforcement policy to identify potentially more effective approaches.

Chapter 7: The interface between member countries and the European CommissionBetter Regulation in Europe - France - Chapter 7

  • Evaluate the transposition procedure, for directives generally and for each ministry and/or sector, to identify where the problems lie. Consider whether existing legal provisions are one of the reasons behind transposition difficulties. Discuss the issue with other countries with limited means, such as Ireland and Finland.
Chapter 8: The interface between subnational and national levels of government
  • With the support of SYVICOL (Union of Luxembourg Cities and Communes), consider whether to adopt an action plan and priorities for Better Regulation in areas of municipal responsibility.
  • Build into the central policy for Better Regulation an aspect concerning the central/municipal link.

How to obtain this publication

Download the complete PDF e-book: Better Regulation in Europe: Luxembourg

Go to

 

More information

______________________________________________________________

For further information, please contact Caroline Varley or Shayne MacLachlan

______________________________________________________________ 

www.oecd.org/gov/regref/eu15

 

 

 

Countries list

  • Afghanistan
  • Albania
  • Algeria
  • Andorra
  • Angola
  • Anguilla
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Aruba
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Bangladesh
  • Barbados
  • Belarus
  • Belgium
  • Belize
  • Benin
  • Bermuda
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Bulgaria
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burundi
  • Cambodia
  • Cameroon
  • Canada
  • Cape Verde
  • Cayman Islands
  • Central African Republic
  • Chad
  • Chile
  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Chinese Taipei
  • Colombia
  • Comoros
  • Congo
  • Cook Islands
  • Costa Rica
  • Croatia
  • Cuba
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Denmark
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
  • Estonia
  • Ethiopia
  • European Union
  • Faeroe Islands
  • Fiji
  • Finland
  • Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)
  • France
  • French Guiana
  • Gabon
  • Gambia
  • Georgia
  • Germany
  • Ghana
  • Gibraltar
  • Greece
  • Greenland
  • Grenada
  • Guatemala
  • Guernsey
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Guyana
  • Haiti
  • Honduras
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iraq
  • Ireland
  • Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Isle of Man
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Jamaica
  • Japan
  • Jersey
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kiribati
  • Korea
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Latvia
  • Lebanon
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Libya
  • Liechtenstein
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Macao (China)
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Malaysia
  • Maldives
  • Mali
  • Malta
  • Marshall Islands
  • Mauritania
  • Mauritius
  • Mayotte
  • Mexico
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • Moldova
  • Monaco
  • Mongolia
  • Montenegro
  • Montserrat
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
  • Nauru
  • Nepal
  • Netherlands
  • Netherlands Antilles
  • New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Niue
  • Norway
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Palau
  • Palestinian Administered Areas
  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Philippines
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Puerto Rico
  • Qatar
  • Romania
  • Russian Federation
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Helena
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Samoa
  • San Marino
  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Senegal
  • Serbia
  • Serbia and Montenegro (pre-June 2006)
  • Seychelles
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Slovak Republic
  • Slovenia
  • Solomon Islands
  • Somalia
  • South Africa
  • South Sudan
  • Spain
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Swaziland
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • Tajikistan
  • Tanzania
  • Thailand
  • Timor-Leste
  • Togo
  • Tokelau
  • Tonga
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Tuvalu
  • Uganda
  • Ukraine
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • United States Virgin Islands
  • Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vanuatu
  • Venezuela
  • Vietnam
  • Virgin Islands (UK)
  • Wallis and Futuna Islands
  • Western Sahara
  • Yemen
  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe