Training programmes

 

Rationale | next

 

8.4  To what extent does the government promote training programmes and has it adopted practices that evaluate their effectiveness and their impact on the investment environment? What mechanisms are used to encourage businesses to offer training to employees and to play a larger role in co-financing training?


Rationale for the question


While formal education equips individuals with the skills needed to learn, new recruits tend to lack the firm-specific knowledge that businesses require to unlock an employee’s full productive potential. Transmitting these firm-specific skills is the domain of on-the-job training and specialized off-site training. As with basic education, market failures lead to too little training by businesses and the limited training that is undertaken is often concentrated within a narrow group of individuals. The shortage of trained workers is thus an obstacle to expanding investment and makes it particularly hard to attract high-skill-intensive industries. The macroeconomic costs in terms of lost potential output can also be sizeable, given the productivity gains linked to training and because of the positive spillovers that multinational enterprises transmit to local firms. Policy instruments to support training are many and include co-financing arrangements, tax incentive schemes and subsidies. Evaluations of these instruments are likely to be country specific. What is important from the investment environment perspective is to ensure stable training programmes that are in line with business requirements and coupled with evaluations to favour those schemes with a proven track record of high rates of return.

 

previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | next

 

Human resource development home page