OECD Home › Investment › Bribery in international business › Latest Documents
English, , 120kb
This questionnaire is sent to the countries undertaking Phase 3 evaluation under the Procedure of Self- and Mutual Evaluation.
OECD Deputy Secretary-General Richard Boucher and the United Kingdom’s Secretary of Justice the Rt Hon Jack Straw MP and UK Permanent Representative to the OECD Dominic Martin talked about the challenges of tackling bribery at a conference in Chatham House
English, , 433kb
This report outlines Portugal's response to the recommendations and follow-up issues identified by the Working Group at the time of Portugal's Phase 2 examination in March 2007.
The OECD Working Group on Bribery sharply criticised the Slovak Republic’s failure to bring its anti-bribery law on corporate liability into line with its international obligations under the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.
Israel should be more proactive in detecting, investigating and prosecuting foreign bribery cases, notably those involving the defence industry, according to a new report by the OECD Working Group on Bribery.
What past and future steps did/will countries take to ratify and implement the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention?
English, , 733kb
This report outlines Israel's response to the recommendations and follow-up issues identified by the Working Group at the time of Israel's Phase 2 examination in June-July 2009.
On 9 December, International Anti-Corruption Day, the OECD celebrated the 10th anniversary of the entry into force of the Anti-Bribery Convention with a high-level roundtable on 'Foreign Bribery: Who Pays the Price', followed by a two-part discussion on the media in the fight against foreign bribery and major emerging economies in the fight against foreign bribery.
Celebrating International Anti-Corruption Day and the 10th anniversary of the entry into force of the OECD’s Anti-Bribery Convention, Angel Gurría talks about the international fight against foreign bribery and the OECD's efforts to highlight its devastating impact.
English, , 328kb
The Phase 1ter report of Chile was undertaken in response to the fact that the Phase 1bis evaluation did not consider Chile’s implementation of Article 2 of the Convention, and associated matters.