Consumer policy

Remarks of Andrew Wyckoff on 'Consumer Policy Toolkit'

 

REMARKS

 

Andrew Wyckoff, Director, OECD's Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry

 

on the occasion of the 'Consumer Policy Toolkit' Roundtable

21 July 2010

 

US Federal Trade Commission


Thank you Ambassador Kornbluh, and my thanks to Chairman Leibowtiz and the Federal Trade Commission for hosting this Roundtable. We welcome the strong support that the US is giving to our work in the consumer policy area.


The Toolkit is an important document for policy makers, regulators, economists and consumer organisations alike. It presents a robust framework for understanding how consumer markets are changing and the implications that these changes have for policy making. It shows, for the first time, how what we have learned through the study of information and behavioural economics can be used to refine our traditional [neoclassical] approaches to policy making. This is an important development that will help boost the effectiveness of policy interventions.


Finally, the toolkit presents and elaborates a six-step process for sound policy making, describing the issues that should be considered prior to implementing policy measures. It describes the twelve basic tools that are available to policy makers and the conditions under which each tool can be effective.
What I would like to do in the next several minutes is to highlight some of the key points in the Toolkit, and then provide an opportunity for us to discuss any comments you may have.


I. How have consumers and markets changed over the past twenty years?


The Toolkit examines how consumers and markets have changed over the past twenty years. The bottom line – there is far more choice and far more complexity in consumer markets. This has generally benefitted consumers, but has raised challenges.

  • Regulatory reform has boosted competition, providing consumers with greater choice in, for example, energy and telecommunication services from a larger number of suppliers. Product offerings, however, are no longer standard and are more complex, making it difficult to make comparisons. Comparing different telecom packages, as you may well know, is a nightmare. Moreover, new entrants may use misleading or deceptive practices to gain market share.
  • Rapid development and diffusion of new technologies have provided consumers with a continuous supply of new products. Whereas it took 71 years for the telephone to be adopted in US households, it took less than 10 years for the Internet to do this. In the case of the Internet, the consumers have a new tool for searching and purchasing goods and services, but at the same time they face increased risks of fraud. 
  • While the education level is rising in most OECD countries, literacy levels are surprisingly relatively low. In many countries many people do not have the skills needed to deal with standard consumer contracts. Such contracts have in fact become more complex over time, further complicating the situation. The debacle in home mortgage markets is a good example.
  • Changing consumer demographics are also a challenge. Youth are becoming more active as consumers at earlier ages, due in part to the Internet and the growth in mobile devices. At the same time, the number of senior citizens is growing. These two groups are often seen as requiring special attention due to their “vulnerability.”


The Toolkit delves into these and a number of other important changes in consumer behaviour and markets. In light of the changes, policy makers are seeing a need to place greater emphasis on policies and programmes that “empower” consumers, by promoting market transparency and by providing information and guidance on ways to make better decisions, avoid problems and obtain redress when disputes arise. At the same time, policy makers need to be prepared to address ongoing and new forms of fraud, in particular in the online environment.


II. How has our thinking about consumer economics evolved?   


One of the most interesting parts of the Toolkit is the chapter on the economics of consumer policy [Chapter II]. As you know, the conventional approach to consumer economics assumes that consumers will act rationally and that they are well informed. In today’s markets, we observe these conditions do not always prevail.

  • Information is asymmetric, with suppliers often knowing much more than consumers about the goods and services being sold. 
  • Consumers operating under time constraints often cut off their searches before they are complete, resulting in decisions that reflect bounded rationality.
  • The quality of information is sometimes poor; claims may be fraudulent, deceptive, confusing or difficult to understand. Also, too much information can be as problematic as too little. 


Behavioural economics is showing us that consumers do not always act rationally and that there appear to be certain behavioural biases that are rather common.

  • Consumers often accept the defaults proposed by sellers even though it may not be in their interest; this has been particularly noticeable in Internet transactions, where it is observed that consumers often carelessly accept pre-selected options that add to costs.
  • The way that information is framed can have a significant impact on consumer decisions. A product advertised as 90% fat-free, for example, is likely to sell better than one that is sold as containing 10% fat.
  • Consumers tend to treat the present in a “special” way that exaggerates its importance, resulting in a phenomenon commonly referred to as hyperbolic discounting. Such discounting has significant implications for consumers as it means they could well make decisions today that they would regret in the future.
  • Faced with too much choice or complexity, consumers may use rules of thumb (heuristics), to make decisions, assuming, for example that a highly priced bottle of wine is higher quality than a cheaper one.

 

The Toolkit examines these areas in detail, providing insights into the implications for policy formulation. This is clearly an area where the Toolkit is having, and will have, a major impact on our thinking.


III. How can the Toolkit be used by policy makers?


The Toolkit does far more than describing how markets and economic thinking have evolved. It provides a practical guide for improving policy making.


One chapter [Chapter III] delves into the techniques that can be used to detect markets where consumers are experiencing what we refer to as consumer detriment, or harm. It describes the different forms that detriment can take, the signs of such detriment, and the variable affects it can have on vulnerable and disadvantages consumers. Numerous examples are provided on how information on consumer complaints can be used to identify problem markets, and how different types of surveys and fieldwork (mystery shopping and focus groups) can be used for this as well. Examples of what some countries (such as the UK, Norway and Denmark) have done to develop composite indicators that can be used to assess markets are also explored.


Another chapter [Chapter IV] presents the 12 key policy tools that are available to consumer authorities. The chapter outlines how these tools can be used effectively and identifies their potential impacts. Numerous examples of how the tools were actually used, and their effects, are provided. 

 

For information, here are the tools:

  • Consumer education and awareness -- healthy eating campaign; product advisories; formal education programmes. 
  • Information provision and other disclosure measures -- price comparison tools for energy, telecom packages, etc.; mandatory disclosures for unit prices, etc.
  • Contract terms regulation – regulations on consumer protection that must be included in contracts; phone number portability; opt-in, opt-out for contract renewals.
  • Cooling-off periods – common for home mortgages (one can cancel contract within a period at no or low cost)
  • Moral suasion – “naming and shaming” of poor corporate behaviour; awards/recognition for positive accomplishments
  • Codes of conduct and trustmarks – codes on advertising; Better Business Bureau
  • Standards – can be voluntary of mandatory; ISO
  • Licensing and accreditation of firms or providers – for the trades, for example.
  • Financial instruments – monetary fines.
  • Prohibitions – certain types of conduct (predatory pricing); on the use of certain materials (fluorocarbons)
  • Dispute resolution and redress mechanisms – government sponsored dispute bodies; firm or industry mechanisms. 
  • Enforcement strategies – ranging from persuasion to criminal sanctions

The final chapter [Chapter V] draws all the elements together, providing a detailed, six-step process that policy makers can use to i) determine whether or not they should intervene in a market to address a problem and, if a policy intervention is warranted, ii) the steps that they should take what policy instrument, or instruments, should be used. The steps provide guidance on:

  • How to properly define the problem and its source
  • How to identify the magnitude and scope of consumer detriment
  • How to determine whether a policy intervention is warranted
  • How to set policy objectives and identify the range of policy options that could address the problem
  • How to evaluate and select the most appropriate option, and
  • How to develop a review process to evaluate the effectiveness of a policy

Conclusion


In conclusion, I would note that the Toolkit is actually already being used by the Committee in work that is being carried out on e-commerce and green claims. Next year, we will be organising workshops in which it will be used to tackle some of the most difficult problems facing consumers and consumer agencies.
Thank you for your attention and interest.

 

 

 

Countries list

  • Afghanistan
  • Albania
  • Algeria
  • Andorra
  • Angola
  • Anguilla
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Aruba
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Bangladesh
  • Barbados
  • Belarus
  • Belgium
  • Belize
  • Benin
  • Bermuda
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Bulgaria
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burundi
  • Cambodia
  • Cameroon
  • Canada
  • Cape Verde
  • Cayman Islands
  • Central African Republic
  • Chad
  • Chile
  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Chinese Taipei
  • Colombia
  • Comoros
  • Congo
  • Cook Islands
  • Costa Rica
  • Croatia
  • Cuba
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Denmark
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
  • Estonia
  • Ethiopia
  • European Union
  • Faeroe Islands
  • Fiji
  • Finland
  • Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)
  • France
  • French Guiana
  • Gabon
  • Gambia
  • Georgia
  • Germany
  • Ghana
  • Gibraltar
  • Greece
  • Greenland
  • Grenada
  • Guatemala
  • Guernsey
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Guyana
  • Haiti
  • Honduras
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iraq
  • Ireland
  • Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Isle of Man
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Jamaica
  • Japan
  • Jersey
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kiribati
  • Korea
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Latvia
  • Lebanon
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Libya
  • Liechtenstein
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Macao (China)
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Malaysia
  • Maldives
  • Mali
  • Malta
  • Marshall Islands
  • Mauritania
  • Mauritius
  • Mayotte
  • Mexico
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • Moldova
  • Monaco
  • Mongolia
  • Montenegro
  • Montserrat
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
  • Nauru
  • Nepal
  • Netherlands
  • Netherlands Antilles
  • New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Niue
  • Norway
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Palau
  • Palestinian Administered Areas
  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Philippines
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Puerto Rico
  • Qatar
  • Romania
  • Russian Federation
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Helena
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Samoa
  • San Marino
  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Senegal
  • Serbia
  • Serbia and Montenegro (pre-June 2006)
  • Seychelles
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Slovak Republic
  • Slovenia
  • Solomon Islands
  • Somalia
  • South Africa
  • South Sudan
  • Spain
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Swaziland
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • Tajikistan
  • Tanzania
  • Thailand
  • Timor-Leste
  • Togo
  • Tokelau
  • Tonga
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Tuvalu
  • Uganda
  • Ukraine
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • United States Virgin Islands
  • Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vanuatu
  • Venezuela
  • Vietnam
  • Virgin Islands (UK)
  • Wallis and Futuna Islands
  • Western Sahara
  • Yemen
  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe