Table of Contents and Policy Brief | How to Obtain this Publication
Most OECD countries have made policies to reduce administrative burdens – cutting red tape – a political priority. Red tape is particularly burdensome to smaller companies and may inhibit entrepreneurship. These effects are more costly in global markets, where competitiveness can be affected by the efficiency of the domestic regulatory and administrative environment. But citizens and large firms also complain about unnecessary reporting requirements. Results are wanted.
What can governments do? Strategies include setting quantitative targets to reduce administrative burdens when new regulations are drafted and by reviewing older regulations; codification; better multi-level co-ordination; and rapid introduction of e-government services. Supported by taskforces and advisory committees, governments increasingly locate responsibility in a central administrative unit. This “whole-of-government” approach represents a major step in recent years, embedding administrative simplification in the overall regulatory quality system at the national level.
Table of Contents and Policy Brief
- Policy Brief: Cutting Red Tape: National Strategies (pdf)
Chapter 1. Simplification Strategies
Chapter 2. Simplification Tools
Chapter 3. Institutional Frameworks
How to Obtain this Publication
Readers can access the full version of Cutting Red Tape: National Strategies for Administrative Simplification choosing from the following options:
This publication is also available in French, Japanese, Portuguese and Spanish.
Administrative Simplification in Viet Nam: Supporting the Competitiveness of the Vietnamese Economy
Administrative Simplification in Poland: Making Policies Perform
Cutting red tape: administrative simplification in the Netherlands
From Red Tape to Smart Tape: Administrative Simplification in OECD Countries