Partager

Publications & Documents


  • 24-October-2018

    English

    Review of International Regulatory Co-operation of Mexico

    International regulatory co-operation (IRC) represents an important opportunity for countries, and in particular domestic regulators, to consider the impacts of their regulations beyond their borders, expand the evidence for decision-making, learn from the experience of their peers, and develop concerted approaches to challenges that transcend borders. This report provides the first OECD assessment of a country’s IRC framework and practices. Mexico’s active efforts to embrace globalisation are reflected in many aspects of its domestic policies, practices and institutions. On one hand, it has undertaken unilateral efforts to embed international considerations in its domestic rule-making through regulatory improvement disciplines and with the consideration of international standards in the drafting of technical regulations. On the other hand, the Mexican government and individual regulators also engage extensively in co-operative efforts on regulatory matters, at the bilateral, regional and multilateral level. Based on the overview of Mexico’s practices and comparison with other OECD countries, the review recommends three areas for improvement: designing a horizontal government-wide strategy for IRC, enhancing information about the tools and benefits of IRC, and offering the necessary tools to support systematic implementation of IRC.
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 23-October-2018

    English

    Fighting bid rigging in government contracts: Mexico-OECD partnership

    Mexico has partnered with the OECD to improve its procurement practices and step up its fight against bid rigging. In January 2011, Mexico's Social Security Department became the first public agency in Mexico (and in the world) to formally commit to adopt and implement the OECD Competition Committee’s Guidelines for Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement.

    Related Documents
  • 19-octobre-2018

    Français

    Mexique - Convention de l'OCDE sur la lutte contre la corruption

    Cette page contient toutes les informations se rapportant à la mise en oeuvre de la Convention de l’OCDE sur la lutte contre la corruption au Mexique.

    Documents connexes
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 19-October-2018

    English

    Mr. Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, in Mexico City, 22-26 October 2018

    Mr. Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD, will be in Mexico city, from 22 to 26 October 2018 on an official visit, to meet with high level authorities from the current and the incoming governments.

    Related Documents
  • 19-octobre-2018

    Français

    Le Mexique doit renforcer l’application de sa législation contre la corruption transnationale : la pleine mise en œuvre des réformes anticorruption pourrait y contribuer

    Le Mexique doit mettre davantage l’accent sur l’application de sa législation contre la corruption transnationale, n'ayant pas encore engagé de poursuites pour la corruption d’agents publics étrangers 19 ans après avoir ratifié la Convention anticorruption de l’OCDE.

    Documents connexes
  • 1-October-2018

    English

    OECD welcomes announcement of new trade agreement between US, Mexico and Canada

    OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría has welcomed the announcement of a new, modernised United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

    Related Documents
  • 30-August-2018

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Mexico (Stage 1) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The minimum standard is complemented by a set of best practices. The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Mexico.
  • 28-August-2018

    English

    OECD Territorial Reviews: Morelos, Mexico - Monitoring Progress and Special Focus on Accessibility

    This report assesses the extent to which the state of Morelos, Mexico has implemented the OECD recommendations set in the Territorial Review of Morelos, published in 2017. The recommendations addressed matters of human capital, education, skills, innovation, territorial development, sustainable development, governance and public finances. For each of them, the monitoring toolkit indicates areas of change, identifies bottlenecks and proposes ways forward. The timeframe of implementation is also considered. The report further analyses the impacts of the earthquake of 19 September 2017 and the policy responses adopted in its aftermath. It offers advice on how to lead a reconstruction process that delivers a better state of affairs than the previous one, especially concerning territorial development and infrastructure investments. It advances a new topic, on connectivity and accessibility, in view of recent investments in rail and road infrastructure.
  • 27-August-2018

    English

    OECD's Gurría welcomes positive outcome of US - Mexico trade talks

    Angel Gurría, OECD Secretary-General, welcomes the positive outcome of the trade negotiations, carried out by the representatives of Mexico and the United States, which will be joined by Canada shortly.

    Related Documents
  • 16-August-2018

    English

    Savings in administrative burdens in Colima and Jalisco

    This report measures the administrative costs generated by formalities in the municipalities of Colima and Jalisco.

    Related Documents
  • << < 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 > >>