By Date


  • 16-octobre-2017

    Français

    Pratiques fiscales dommageables - Rapport d'étape de 2017 sur les régimes préférentiels - Cadre inclusif sur le BEPS : Action 5

    Le Rapport sur l’Action 5 établit l’un des quatre standards minimums prévus par le projet BEPS que tous les membres du Cadre inclusif se sont engagés à mettre en œuvre. Un aspect du standard minimum défini par  l’Action 5 se rapporte au processus d’examen par les pairs des régimes fiscaux préférentiels afin d’identifier les caractéristiques de ces régimes qui peuvent faciliter l'érosion de la base et le transfert de bénéfices et peuvent donc avoir une incidence défavorable sur l'assiette fiscale d'autres juridictions.
    Ce rapport d'étape constitue une mise à jour du rapport de BEPS sur l’Action 5 de 2015 et contient les résultats de l'examen de tous les régimes fiscaux préférentiels des membres du cadre inclusif  de BEPS qui ont été identifiés. Les résultats présentés sont ceux en date du mois d'octobre 2017.
    Le rapport contient également des directives relatives aux régimes fiscaux préférentiels, y compris les délais pour les régimes en cours de modification, le mode de suivi de certaines caractéristiques des régimes préférentiels et des conseils pratiques sur l’exigence selon laquelle les juridictions offrant des régimes préférentiels sont tenues d’établir des critères d’activités substantielles dans les régimes préférentiels.

  • 13-October-2017

    English

    G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting: International Taxation

    Digitalisation is having a profound impact on our societies. It offers many opportunities as a driver of innovation in the private and public sectors. We are already seeing, for example, how our tax administrations are benefiting from these new technologies to enhance services to taxpayers, improve tax compliance and tackle tax evasion and avoidance.

    Related Documents
  • 12-October-2017

    English

    Revenue Statistics in Africa 2017

    The publication Revenue Statistics in Africa is jointly undertaken by the OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration and the OECD Development Centre, the African Union Commission (AUC) and the African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF) with funding by the European Union. It compiles comparable tax revenue and non-tax revenue statistics for 16 countries in Africa: Cabo Verde, Cameroon,  the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Morocco, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, Swaziland, Togo, Tunisia and Uganda. The model is the OECD Revenue Statistics database which is a fundamental reference, backed by a well-established methodology, for OECD member countries. Extending the OECD methodology to African countries enables comparisons of tax-to-GDP ratios and tax structures on a consistent basis, both among African economies and with OECD, Latin American, Caribbean and Asian economies.

  • 12-octobre-2017

    Français

    La mobilisation des recettes continue de s’améliorer en Afrique, d’après un nouveau rapport

    La mobilisation des ressources domestiques progresse de façon constante dans les pays africains, selon l’édition 2017 des Statistiques des recettes publiques en Afrique, diffusée ce jour à Addis-Abeba dans le cadre d’une réunion des responsables de la fiscalité et de la finance de 21 pays africains accueillie par le Département des Affaires Économiques de la Commission de l’Union africaine.

    Documents connexes
  • 12-octobre-2017

    Français, PDF, 1,359kb

    statistiques-recettes-publiques-afrique-brochure

    Brochure pour l’édition 2017 des Statistiques des recettes publiques en Afrique 2017

    Documents connexes
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 12-October-2017

    English

    Planned stakeholder input in OECD tax matters

    The OECD's Committee on Fiscal Affairs consults with business and other interested parties through a variety of means to inform its work in the tax area. One important way of obtaining such input is through the release of papers or discussion drafts for public comment.

    Related Documents
  • 11-October-2017

    English

    BEPS Action 13: OECD releases CbC reporting implementation status and exchange relationships between tax administrations

    Today, a further step was taken to implement Country-by-Country Reporting in accordance with the BEPS Action 13 minimum standard, through activations of automatic exchange relationships under the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of CbC Reports ("the CbC MCAA").

    Related Documents
  • 6-October-2017

    English

    Public comments received on BEPS discussion drafts on attribution of profits to permanent establishments and transactional profit splits

    The OECD is publishing the comments received on a discussion draft on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments (BEPS Action 7) and on a second discussion draft on the Revised Guidance on Profit Splits (BEPS Actions 8-10).

  • 29-September-2017

    English

    Leading tax administrations focused on effective delivery of the OECD/G20 BEPS outcomes, automatic exchange of information and tax certainty and collaborate on taxing users of the sharing economy

    The Forum on Tax Administration (FTA) is the leading international body concerned with tax administration. The FTA, which brings together Tax Commissioners from 50 advanced and emerging tax administrations (including OECD and G20 countries), held its Plenary meeting in Oslo on 27-29 September.

    Related Documents
  • 29-September-2017

    English

    The Changing Tax Compliance Environment and the Role of Audit

    The report sets out how tax compliance strategies are evolving in light of new technologies, data sources and tools, including the increasing use of advanced analytics. It also looks at how these changes might affect the role of audit and auditors in the future. Finally it suggests a number of areas where further work by the Forum on Tax Administration might assist tax administrations in their consideration and implementation of administrative reforms as a result of the changing compliance environment.

  • << < 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 > >>