This book presents a comprehensive review of health care quality in Norway. It finds that Norway has an impressive and comprehensive health system, which is the result of sustained commitment to providing health care for the whole Norwegian population, investment in the health system, and readiness to make changes to drive improvements. On most indicators Norway’s health system appears to be performing well, although there is some room for improvement. There have been a number of significant health care reforms in Norway over the last decade, most recently the Coordination Reform, which took effect in January 2012.
Broadly this is a positive story, but challenges do lie ahead for Norway. Norway is putting in place measures to respond to these challenges, notably with the 2012 Coordination Reform, but still has some way to go before the fruits of such labour are truly felt across the health system. Norway’s ambitious reform agenda must now be balanced by structured efforts ‘on the ground’. Attention should now turn to putting in place appropriate data infrastructures, promoting meaningful engagement between key stakeholders, and by balancing a generous health budget that allows for important investments in developing new structures and services with attention to getting the most out of existing services.
L’amélioration du dispositif de soins primaires et de la coordination des services de santé aiderait la Norvège à répondre à l’évolution des besoins de son système de santé, compte tenu du vieillissement de la population et du raccourcissement des séjours à l’hôpital, selon un nouveau rapport de l’OCDE.
La Suisse devrait renforcer son action pour favoriser l’accès ou le maintien à l’emploi des personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux.
This report reviews the quality of health care in Sweden. It begins by providing an overview of the range of policies and practices aimed at supporting quality of care in Sweden (Chapter 1). It then focuses on three key areas particularly relevant to elderly populations: strengthening primary care in Sweden (Chapter 2), better assurance for quality in long-term care (Chapter 3), and improving care after hip fracture and stroke (Chapter 4). In examining these areas, this report highlights best practices and provides recommendations to improve the quality of care in Sweden.
Français, PDF, 240kb
La France a un système de santé qui se compare toujours avantageusement, à bien des égards, à la plupart des autres pays de l’OCDE. Mais il est important de poursuivre les efforts visant la prévention des maladies et l’amélioration de l’efficience du système de santé pour maintenir la qualité et l’accès aux soins dans un contexte budgétaire serré, selon un nouveau rapport de l’OCDE.
This seventh edition of Health at a Glance provides the latest comparable data on different aspects of the performance of health systems in OECD countries. It provides striking evidence of large variations across countries in the costs, activities and results of health systems. Key indicators provide information on health status including suicide and life expectancy, the determinants of health, health care activities and
English, PDF, 2,124kb
Access key charts in this Health at a Glance 2013 Chart set presentation
Français, PDF, 2,168kb
Accéder à des graphiques clés grâce à cette présentation Chart set sur le Panorama de la santé 2013
Cette nouvelle édition du Panorama de la santé présente les données comparables les plus récentes sur la performance des systèmes de santé dans les pays de l’OCDE.
More than five million new cases of cancer are diagnosed every year in OECD countries. Mortality rates are declining, but not as fast as for other big killers such as heart disease, and cancer survival rates show almost a four-fold difference across countries. In short, many countries are not doing as well as they could in the fight against cancer.
Cancer Care: Assuring Quality to Improve Survival surveys the policy trends in cancer care over recent years and looks at survival rates to identify the why some countries are doing better than others. It sets out what governments should do to reduce the burden of cancer in their countries. As well as an adequate level of resourcing, a comprehensive national cancer control plan appears critical, emphasising initiatives such as early detection and fast-track treatment pathways. Countries also need better data, particularly for patients’ experiences of care, in order to provide high quality, continuously improving cancer care.