Latest Documents


  • 4-décembre-2015

    Français

    Concevoir des règles efficaces concernant les sociétés étrangères contrôlées, Action 3 - Rapport final 2015

    Ce rapport formule des recommandations sous la forme de composantes permettant d’élaborer des règles efficaces applicables aux sociétés étrangères contrôlées (SEC). Ces recommandations visent à garantir que les pays qui choisissent de les mettre en œuvre sont dotés de règles qui empêchent les contribuables de transférer des revenus vers des filiales étrangères. Le rapport recense les six composantes suivantes pour la conception de règles efficaces sur les SEC : (1) définition d’une SEC, (2) exemptions aux règles sur les SEC et obligations de seuil, (3) définition du revenu, (4) calcul du revenu, (5) attribution du revenu, et (6) règles tendant à prévenir et supprimer la double imposition. Étant donné que chaque pays a des priorités différentes, les recommandations offrent une certaine souplesse pour appliquer les règles sur les SEC visant les pratiques de BEPS en conformité avec les objectifs stratégiques d’ensemble de son système fiscal et avec les obligations juridiques internationales qui lui incombent.

  • 3-December-2015

    English, PDF, 106kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for Czech Republic

    The tax burden in the Czech Republic declined by 0.8 percentage points from 34.3% to 33.5% in 2014. The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.2 percentage points from 34.2% to 34.4%.

    Related Documents
  • 3-December-2015

    English, PDF, 106kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for Slovenia

    The tax burden in Slovenia declined by 0.2 percentage points from 36.8% to 36.6% in 2014. The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.2 percentage points from 34.2% to 34.4%.

    Related Documents
  • 3-December-2015

    English, PDF, 106kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for Sweden

    The tax burden in Sweden declined by 0.1 percentage points from 42.8% to 42.7% in 2014. The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.2 percentage points from 34.2% to 34.4%.

    Related Documents
  • 3-December-2015

    English, PDF, 120kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for Poland

    The tax burden in Poland declined by 0.4 percentage points from 32.3% to 31.9% in 2013¹. The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.4 percentage points from 33.8% to 34.2%.

    Related Documents
  • 3-December-2015

    English, PDF, 106kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for New Zealand

    The tax burden in New Zealand increased by 1.0 percentage points from 31.4% to 32.4% in 2014. The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.2 percentage points from 34.2% to 34.4%.

    Related Documents
  • 3-December-2015

    English, PDF, 106kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for Chile

    The tax burden in Chile declined by 0.2 percentage points from 20.0% to 19.8% in 2014. The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.2 percentage points from 34.2% to 34.4%.

    Related Documents
  • 3-December-2015

    English, PDF, 106kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for Luxembourg

    The tax burden in Luxembourg declined by 0.6 percentage points from 38.4% to 37.8% in 2014. The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.2 percentage points from 34.2% to 34.4%.

    Related Documents
  • 3-December-2015

    English, PDF, 120kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for Australia

    The tax burden in Australia increased by 0.2 percentage points from 27.3% to 27.5% in 2013¹. The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.4 percentage points from 33.8% to 34.2%

    Related Documents
  • 3-December-2015

    English, PDF, 106kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for Switzerland

    The tax burden in Switzerland declined by 0.3 percentage points from 26.9% to 26.6% in 2014. The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.2 percentage points from 34.2% to 34.4%.

    Related Documents
  • << < 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 > >>