Encouraging the efficient and sustainable use of natural resources: policy instruments and social acceptability
Background materials l Presentations and statements
The 1st Green Growth and Sustainable Development Forum (GG-SD Forum) took place on 23 November 2012 and was attended by approximately 250 participants, including representatives from ministries of finance, economics, environment, development cooperation, sciences, industry and technology, and foreign affairs, as well as from international organisations, the private sector and civil society. The Forum welcomed representatives from Cambodia, China, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Philippines, Russia, Sierra Leone and South Africa. A full day discussion on how to encourage a more efficient and sustainable use of natural resources, looking at the implications for advanced, emerging and developing countries. Stakeholders took this opportunity to exchange experiences and best practices with the management of natural resources.
The OECD is at the forefront of global work on green growth and plays a key role in post-crisis recovery plans in many countries in order to foster growth and achieve sustainable development.
In his introduction, Rintaro Tamaki (OECD Deputy Secretary-General) highlighted the Forum’s goal to provide a dedicated space for multidisciplinary discussions on green growth and sustainable-development issues as well as for the identification of key knowledge gaps that could usefully be addressed by future work of OECD Committees.
|Session 1: The state of natural resources: What is the case for green growth?
This session sets the scene on the state of natural resources and discussed the importance of their efficient use and management for green growth and more sustainable patterns of development. Simon Upton (Director, OECD Environment Directorate) reported on relevant findings from two recent OECD studies on material resource productivity and sustainable materials management as well as on progress with natural resource accounting at the national level. Frank Sperling (African Development Bank) concentrated on the example of Africa, noting that while the continent's ecological footprint remains comparatively small its vulnerability to climate change is compounding local environmental challenges (e.g. land degradation) and an increasing population that is expected to further increase pressures on natural resources. Resource stability, minimizing waste and pollution and building resilience should be some of the core objectives of green-growth policies in developing economies. The discussion following this session stressed the need for further efforts to implement the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) and ensure data consistency and comparability.
|Session 2: Natural resources and risks to growth
The purpose of this session was to consider some of the risks to growth from the mis-management of natural resources and to discuss ongoing work by the OECD that can contribute to a better understanding of how to assess and take into account such risks in decision-making. Sierra Leone's presentation provided an example of a fragile state, which due to its rich endowment of natural resources is taking concrete green growth action as a means to achieve poverty-reduction goals and environmentally and socially sustainable growth over the longer term. Nicola Brandt (OECD Economics Department) presented recent OECD work on adjusting traditional productivity growth measures to include natural capital, CO2 emissions and pollution and their implication for assessing economic performance. Laura Cozzi (International Energy Agency) presented the key messages from the latest World Energy Outlook 2012. According to the report, greater efforts on enhancing energy efficiency could cut the projected growth in global energy demand in the period to 2035 by half. The session revealed that the lack of reliable data remains a major challenge for both analytical work and policy making.
|Session 3: Measuring and valuing natural resources
This session focused on progress of key OECD and other international initiatives on the valuation of natural assets and ecosystem services as well as country experience in implementing natural capital accounts. Peter van de Ven (OECD Statistics Directorate) presented recent OECD work on the Natural Resource Index, including first results from its application. As to now, environmental assets used in this index are limited to natural resources, but ongoing work aims to incorporate water resources. Nicole Wyrsch (World Bank) presented the World Bank’s Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) initiative that aims to assist countries in the implementation of environmental accounting and to develop standard approaches for ecosystem service accounts. The initiative focuses on scaling up natural capital accounting on the basis of the SEEA, providing technical support, further developing the methodology for ecosystem accounting, and extending partnerships with the private sector.
The session was followed by a special lecture on ‘The Planet’s Resources and Human Demand For Them' held by Vaclav Smil (Distinguished Professor of the University of Manitoba, Canada). Professor Smil argued for a stronger focus on soil, including nitrogen flows and genetic diversity, when analyzing and understanding natural resource developments. Improvements in energy and material efficiency are critical for better management of natural resources, but will need to be a accompanied by changes in current consumption patterns.
|Session 4: Tools for the efficient and sustainable Management of natural resources
The purpose of this session was to discuss the characteristics and design of various market instruments for natural resource management, including implementation and distributional issues and the importance of additional instruments to strengthen the governance for natural resource management. Norway presented principles and key common considerations of natural resource taxation and showcased its use of resource taxation. Indonesia’s presentation described how fiscal incentives could help to achieve a sustainable management of natural resources, which focuses on carbon-free energy generation and sustainable forest management. Denmark presented preliminary statistics on its green industry sector and its contribution to the Danish economy. A final presentation by Manfred Rosenstock (DG Environment, European Commission) provided principles to consider in the design of future natural resource taxes, which have seen a relative decline in Europe in recent years. He stressed the need to consider social acceptability issues in the design of policy tools. Some of the key messages of this session pointed to the need to design country-specific policy instruments, considering e.g. administrative capacity and informality. As regards environmental taxes, participants noted that they often tend to focus on energy and greenhouse gas emissions, and application to other resources and pollutants could be considered.
|Session 5: Panel discussion - Biotrade: Stepping or stumbling stone in the way towards greener growth?
The last session discussed the potential of bio trade for sustainable resource use and green growth. Johanna Speer (German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) opened the panel, highlighting the opportunities that bio trade (e.g. natural cosmetics, medical plants, functional food, etc.) provides for the private sector to bring expertise, creativity and the necessary capital in green growth activities. In this session constraints to the expansion of bio trade were identified on both the national and international level. On the national level, these included high administrative burdens, the lack of access to finance, and the development of trust between the local communities and foreign investors. The green investment policy framework currently developed within the OECD was seen as a useful framework to encapsulate the issues in this regard. On the international level, this comprises access to regional or international supply chains (notably for small enterprises) and the design of quality and labelling standards, which are generally hard to meet for small-scale farmers as opposed to commercial medium- and large-scale producers.
|How Session 6: Conclusions
The last session was devoted to recapitulating the main issues raised during the Forum, to gather suggestions for improvement of future Forum events and to explore future work streams. Simon Upton (Director of the Environment Directorate, OECD) welcomed the Forum as a useful opportunity to link the macro and micro dimension of the topic. A representative of ten CSOs expressed interest in taking on a more active role in the preparation of and the discussions in future events. One of its main conclusions was that knowledge gaps both in terms of data or methodology should not be taken as a justification for the delay of policy action. Policy makers should also not lose sight of environmental limits, meaning that resource efficiency measures need to go hand in hand with changes in consumption patterns. It was also stressed that green growth policies should never stand isolated from the sustainable development framework. The Netherlands emphasised the importance of the practical implications of such meetings and proposed using the Forum as a public-private dialogue platform. Participants expressed support for designing future GG-SD Forums as two-day events.
Presentations and statements
Green Growth and Sustainable Development Forum
Green Growth and Sustainable Development Forum 2013: How to unlock investment in support of green growth?