Fiscalité


  • 30-August-2018

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Australia (Stage 1) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The minimum standard is complemented by a set of best practices.The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Australia, which is accompanied by a document addressing the implementation of best practices which can be accessed on the OECD website: http://oe.cd/bepsaction14.
  • 26-April-2018

    English, PDF, 505kb

    Taxing Wages: Key findings for Australia

    Australia had the 28th lowest tax wedge among the 35 OECD member countries in 2017. The country occupied the same position in 2015. The average single worker in Australia faced a tax wedge of 28.6% in 2017 compared with the OECD average of 35.9%.

  • 23-November-2017

    English, PDF, 335kb

    Revenue Statistics: Key findings for Australia

    The tax-to-GDP ratio in Australia increased by 0.6 percentage points from 27.6% in 2014 to 28.2% in 2015.* The corresponding figures for the OECD average were an increase of 0.1 percentage points from 33.9% to 34.0% over the same period. In 2016 the OECD average was 34.3%.

    Related Documents
  • 21-août-2017

    Français

    Le Forum mondial publie, pour 10 juridictions, les résultats de son second cycle de notation de la conformité à la norme de transparence fiscale

    Le Forum mondial sur la transparence et l’échange de renseignements à des fins fiscales (« le Forum mondial ») a publié ce jour les 10 premières notations attribuées dans le cadre de sa nouvelle procédure étendue d’examen par les pairs visant à évaluer la conformité des juridictions à la norme internationale d’échange de renseignements sur demande (norme EOIR) par les administrations fiscales.

    Documents connexes
  • 21-August-2017

    English

  • 28-March-2017

    English

    Tax and Skills: Key findings for all countries

    These country specific notes provide figures and commentary from the Taxation and Skills publication that examines how tax policy can encourage skills development in OECD countries.

    Related Documents
  • 26-September-2016

    English, PDF, 512kb

    Environmental taxes: Key findings for Australia

    This country note provides an environmental tax and carbon pricing profile for Australia. It shows environmentally related tax revenues, taxes on energy use and effective carbon rates.

    Related Documents
  • 8-July-2016

    English

    Database on instruments used for environmental policy

    This database provides information on environmentally related taxes, fees and charges, tradable permit systems, deposit refund systems, environmentally motivated subsidies and voluntary approaches used in environmental policy in OECD member countries and a number of other countries. Developed in co-operation between the OECD and the European Environment Agency.

    Related Documents
  • 4-juin-2015

    Français

  • 13-November-2014

    English

    Strengthening Global Growth: The G20 Brisbane Summit’s Challenges and Contributions

    The G20 needs to go structural, social, and green! With fiscal and monetary policy room nearly exhausted, structural reforms are the best choices, sometimes the only choice. The OECD battle cry in this regard has been unchanged since 2008: “go structural!”.