Environment in emerging and transition economies

Local Investment Capacity

 

Strengthening Local Governments’ Capacity to Invest in Environmentally-Related Infrastructure

Most EECCA countries have engaged in a systematic devolution of responsibilities for the construction and maintenance of urban environmental infrastructure to sub-sovereign levels of government. As owners of the communal service infrastructure, municipalities are responsible for its rehabilitation, modernisation, and development. Now, devolution of responsibilities needs to be matched by ensuring access to the financial resources needed to implement the new mandates devolved to local and regional jurisdictions. 

As EECCA municipalities are still largely dependant on fiscal transfers from central or regional budgets, they often have to coordinate their infrastructure development plans and capital expenditure budgets with national/regional plans and budgets. This makes strategic planning and investment at local level dependant on the policies at the national/regional level, and generates a risk that local investment plans will not be implemented due to budgetary constraints at other levels of government. In this context, the EAP Task Force has engaged in two lines of activities:

1. It has reviewed the mechanisms of intergovernmental transfers in selected EECCA countries (Armenia, the Russian federation, Ukraine), and drawn lessons on how to design such transfers to better fit the needs of environmental infrastructures. The recommendations (forthcoming) extensively draw upon the experience of OECD in improving the performance and control of sub national public expenditures, and in creating incentives for better coherence between national and local public policies.

2. It has tried to promote multiyear investment planning in EECCA municipalities. The EAP Task Force projects in Ekaterinburg (Russia) and Lutsk (Ukraine) have demonstrated the value of multi-year investment plans (MYIPs) for municipal infrastructure. Such plans could enhance the effectiveness of expenditures and the creditworthiness of municipalities by rationalising the management of local capital and operational budgets. The lessons learnt from these demonstration projects have led to the development of a toolkit for multi-year investment planning in municipalities, which consists of guidelines, instructions, software applications, templates of documents and administrative procedures.

Although many EECCA have prepared national/regional environmental action plans and some of them even financing strategies, the link between these plans and municipal budget planning, especially with regard to investments, remains weak. Good financial management is key in any municipal investment in EECCA, where financial resources in municipal budgets are very limited, and very small expenditures are allocated to investments. Reforming financial management in EECCA municipalities needs to involve regulatory, institutional and psychological changes on both the revenue and expenditure management side of municipal finance.

The overall objective of the project is to help strengthen the investment and borrowing capacity of local governments in EECCA by introducing more rational long-term programming of capital investments in municipal and environmental infrastructure. In addition, this project will focus on further regional dissemination, training and capacity building in the Western EECCA countries and Central Asia based on tools developed in the previous work programme, such as the toolkit for multi-year investment planning in municipalities.

Environment Ministers at the Fifth “Environment for Europe” Ministerial Conference in Kiev, Ukraine (May 2003) noted that more efforts were particularly needed to strengthen local finance and investment capacity by improving fiscal arrangements with higher levels of government, better budget management and multi-year investment plans in municipalities. In this context, the new 2004-2006 EAP Task Force Work Programme on Environmental Finance envisages several major activities, namely:

Short descriptions of the above activities, including specific tasks, outputs and benefits are attached. For more information on strengthening local governments’ capacity to invest in environmentally-related infrastructure, please contact Xavier LEFLAIVE at xavier.leflaive@oecd.org.

 

Related Documents

 

Multi-Year Investment Plan for Municipal Environmental Infrastructure in Ekaterinburg, Russia

Multi-Year Investment Plan for the City of Lutsk, Ukraine

Toolkit for Multi-Year Investment Planning for Municipal Environmental Infrastructure

 

Countries list

  • Afghanistan
  • Albania
  • Algeria
  • Andorra
  • Angola
  • Anguilla
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Aruba
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Bangladesh
  • Barbados
  • Belarus
  • Belgium
  • Belize
  • Benin
  • Bermuda
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Bulgaria
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burundi
  • Cambodia
  • Cameroon
  • Canada
  • Cape Verde
  • Cayman Islands
  • Central African Republic
  • Chad
  • Chile
  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Chinese Taipei
  • Colombia
  • Comoros
  • Congo
  • Cook Islands
  • Costa Rica
  • Croatia
  • Cuba
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Denmark
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
  • Estonia
  • Ethiopia
  • European Union
  • Faeroe Islands
  • Fiji
  • Finland
  • Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)
  • France
  • French Guiana
  • Gabon
  • Gambia
  • Georgia
  • Germany
  • Ghana
  • Gibraltar
  • Greece
  • Greenland
  • Grenada
  • Guatemala
  • Guernsey
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Guyana
  • Haiti
  • Honduras
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iraq
  • Ireland
  • Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Isle of Man
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Jamaica
  • Japan
  • Jersey
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kiribati
  • Korea
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Latvia
  • Lebanon
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Libya
  • Liechtenstein
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Macao (China)
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Malaysia
  • Maldives
  • Mali
  • Malta
  • Marshall Islands
  • Mauritania
  • Mauritius
  • Mayotte
  • Mexico
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • Moldova
  • Monaco
  • Mongolia
  • Montenegro
  • Montserrat
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
  • Nauru
  • Nepal
  • Netherlands
  • Netherlands Antilles
  • New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Niue
  • Norway
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Palau
  • Palestinian Administered Areas
  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Philippines
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Puerto Rico
  • Qatar
  • Romania
  • Russian Federation
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Helena
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Samoa
  • San Marino
  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Senegal
  • Serbia
  • Serbia and Montenegro (pre-June 2006)
  • Seychelles
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Slovak Republic
  • Slovenia
  • Solomon Islands
  • Somalia
  • South Africa
  • South Sudan
  • Spain
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Swaziland
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • Tajikistan
  • Tanzania
  • Thailand
  • Timor-Leste
  • Togo
  • Tokelau
  • Tonga
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Tuvalu
  • Uganda
  • Ukraine
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • United States Virgin Islands
  • Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vanuatu
  • Venezuela
  • Vietnam
  • Virgin Islands (UK)
  • Wallis and Futuna Islands
  • Western Sahara
  • Yemen
  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe
  • Topics list