OECD Home › Employment › By Date
English, PDF, 1,756kb
A Skills beyond School Review of the United States, OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training
The OECD unemployment rate was stable at 8.0% in April 2013, unchanged from the previous month.
English, PDF, 1,838kb
OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training. A Skills beyond School Review of Germany.
English, PDF, 3,129kb
A Skills beyond School Review of Austria
Labour market reform to improve growth prospects and reduce inequality is a top priority in the face of rapid population ageing and a dualistic labour market. Sustaining output growth requires policies to mitigate the impact of rapid population ageing by increasing labour inputs from under-employed segments of the population.
Joint Seminar on "Reforming European Labour Markets: Stimulating Job Creation and Better Outcomes for Youth"
This working paper reports on the work undertaken as part of the Tackling Long-term Unemployment Amongst Vulnerable Groups project. It includes the findings of a survey undertaken jointly by the OECD LEED Programme and the World Association of Public Employment Services in 2012, and also case studies and learning models from around the world on innovative practices to support the long-term unemployed into work.
Norway is better placed to cope with population ageing than most other countries. But it could still do more to improve incentives and opportunities for people to stay working longer which would help ensure the country’s long-term future, according to a new OECD report.
Norwegian, PDF, 46kb
Norway should improve incentives to encourage people to work longer, says OECD in its latest report Ageing and Employment Policies: Norway 2013
Unit labour costs (ULCs) in OECD countries decreased by 0.1% in the first quarter of 2013, compared with a rise of 1.1% in the fourth quarter of 2012. This was driven by lower growth of labour compensation per unit of labour input (0.3% compared with 0.9% in the previous quarter), and increased labour productivity growth (0.4% compared with minus 0.2%).