By Date


  • 1-January-2008

    English, , 658kb

    Recognising non-formal and informal learning: Country Background Report - Belgium (Flanders)

    The purpose of this activity is to provide policymakers with options for developing systems to recognise non-formal and informal learning; to effectively implement the agenda; and determine under what conditions recognition of non-formal and informal learning can be beneficial for all.

    Related Documents
  • 1-January-2008

    English, , 1,770kb

    Recognising non-formal and informal learning: Country Background Report - Germany

    The purpose of this activity is to provide policymakers with options for developing systems to recognise non-formal and informal learning; to effectively implement the agenda; and determine under what conditions recognition of non-formal and informal learning can be beneficial for all. &

    Related Documents
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 1-January-2008

    German, , 2,320kb

    Stand der Anerkennung non-formalenund informellen Lernens in Deutschland

    Related Documents
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 21-December-2007

    English, , 500kb

    School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice, and the Equity of Student Achievement: International Evidence from PISA 2003 (EDU Working Paper No. 14)

    School systems aspire to provide equal opportunity for all, irrespective of socio-economic status (SES). Much of the criticism of recent school reforms that introduce accountability, autonomy, and choice emphasizes their potentially negative consequences for equity. This report provides new evidence on how national features of accountability, autonomy, and choice are related to the equality of opportunity across countries. We estimate

    Related Documents
  • 21-December-2007

    English, , 1,441kb

    School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice, and the Level of Student Achievement: International Evidence from PISA 2003 (EDU Working Paper No. 13)

    Accountability, autonomy, and choice play a leading role in recent school reforms in many countries. This report provides new evidence on whether students perform better in school systems that have such institutional measures in place. We implement an internationally comparative approach within a rigorous micro-econometric framework that accounts for the influences of a large set of student, family, school, and country

    Related Documents
  • 11-December-2007

    English

    Reviews of National Policies for Education - Quality and Equity of Schooling in Scotland

    The review assesses the performance of Scottish schools, using PISA findings and national test and examination results. It also examines educational reforms in Scotland in the light of reforms in countries facing similar challenges.

    Related Documents
  • 6-December-2007

    English, , 1,125kb

    OECD Review of the Quality and Equity of Education Outcomes in Scotland - Diagnostic Report

    In 2006, Scotland asked the OECD to examine the performance of its school system within the framework of the OECD’s reviews of national policies for education.

  • 4-December-2007

    English

    PISA 2006 results

    PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World assesses the performance of 15-year-olds in science, reading and mathematics. It also explores their attitudes towards science, their socio-economic background and their school environment.

  • 3-December-2007

    English, , 255kb

    OECD Activity on Recognition of Non-formal and Informal Learning: Propositions for a Typology of Recognition Systems

    Due to the striking absence of concrete quantitative data on recognition of non-formal and informal learning systems, this paper aims at proposing different possibilities for presenting the existing recognition systems.

    Related Documents
  • 3-December-2007

    English, , 420kb

    OECD Activity on Recognition of Non-formal and Informal Learning: Terms, Concepts and Models for Analysing the Value of Recognition Programmes

    This paper aims at providing ways of analysing whether it is appropriate for a country or any other entity (region, enterprise) to set recognition programmes in motion.

    Related Documents
  • << < 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 > >>